Show source-provided references
1. Lutenegger, A. (2011, January 1–10). Behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in sand. Proceedings of the 2011 Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada.
3. Investigation of pullout load capacity for helical anchors subjected to inclined loading conditions using coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian analyses
10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.03.007 ↗4. Tucker, K. (1987). Uplift capacity of drilled shafts and driven piles in granular materials. Foundations for Transmission Line Towers, ASCE. Geotechnical Special Publication 8.
6. Pullout Load Capacity of a Circular Earth Anchor Buried in Sand
11. Experimental investigation of the uplift behaviour of circular plate anchors embedded in sand
10.1139/t02-005 ↗14. Ovesen, N.K. (1981, January 15–19). Centrifuge tests of the uplift capacity of anchors. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Levesque, C.L. (2002). Centrifuge Modelling of Helical Anchors in Sand. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of New Brunswick].
17. Evaluation of the efficiencies of helical anchor plates in sand by centrifuge model tests
10.1139/t2012-064 ↗23. Evolutionary computing to determine the skin friction capacity of piles embedded in clay and evaluation of the available analytical methods
10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100372 ↗24. Development of an optimized model to compute the undrained shaft friction adhesion factor of bored piles
29. Modelling stress–strain and volume change behaviour of unsaturated soils using an evolutionary based data mining technique, an incremental approach
10.1016/j.engappai.2012.03.006 ↗30. Scale effect in centrifuge tests of helical anchors in sand
32. Olson, R.S., Cava, W.L., Mustahsan, Z., Varik, A., and Moore, J.H. (2018). Data-driven advice for applying machine learning to bioinformatics problems. Biocomputing 2018, World Scientific.
10.1142/9789813235533_0018 ↗33. Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of hard rock pillar stability prediction
10.1007/s11069-015-1842-3 ↗34. Helical piles: An innovative foundation design option for offshore wind turbines
37. Gradient Boosting Decision Tree for Lithology Identification with Well Logs: A Case Study of Zhaoxian Gold Deposit, Shandong Peninsula, China
44. Yan, J., Gao, Y., Yu, Y., Xu, H., and Xu, Z. (2020). A Prediction Model Based on Deep Belief Network and Least Squares SVR Applied to Cross-Section Water Quality. Water, 12.
10.3390/w12071929 ↗47. Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy: Cyclic response in sand and sand over clay
10.1680/jgeot.17.P.273 ↗49. Geopolymer Concrete Compressive Strength via Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Interface System, and Gene Expression Programming With K-Fold Cross Validation
10.3389/fmats.2021.621163 ↗52. Experimental Study and Soft Computing Modeling of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Limestone Rocks Considering Dry and Saturation Conditions
10.1007/s00603-022-02948-y ↗53. Explicit soft computing model to predict the undrained bearing capacity of footing resting on aggregate pier reinforced cohesive ground
10.1007/s41062-021-00706-7 ↗55. Predicting soil available phosphorus by hyperspectral regression method based on gradient boosting decision tree
10.3788/LOP56.131102 ↗56. Comparison of machine learning methods and conventional logistic regressions for predicting gestational diabetes using routine clinical data: A retrospective cohort study
10.1155/2020/4168340 ↗57. A comparison of a gradient boosting decision tree, random forests, and artificial neural networks to model urban land use changes: The case of the Seoul metropolitan area
10.1080/13658816.2021.1887490 ↗58. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth Statistics, Wadsworth.
60. Influence of Dilation Angle on Drained Shallow Circular Anchor Uplift Capacity