Potential of Computer-Aided Engineering in the Design of Ground-Improvement Technologies
Source abstract
Abstract
The progress status of jet-grouting construction during the construction phase is difficult to verify and even after the completion of construction, it can be verified only by empirical methods. This study attempted to recreate a realistic simulation result of the middle-pressure jet-grouting method by establishing a computer-aided engineering (CAE) system from the planning/design stage of the ground model and verifying the validity of the construction process after the model was analyzed by the moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method. The governing parameters for the ground were determined by the MPS simulation of the unconfined compression test. The construction simulation was analyzed and the results were validated by visual confirmation of the related phenomena, such as the soil-improved body formation and mud discharge. To verify the accuracy of the mud discharge phenomenon, three different probe regions were set above the model ground and the amount of mud discharge generated in each region was computed before drawing an overall conclusion of the study. A soil-improvement body of approximately 0.38 m3 was observed to have formed at the end of the study and the highest mud discharge particle number measured, for instance, was 896. This study is expected to serve as a guideline for further studies on simulation-based research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
College of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
Department of Civil Engineering, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngamwongwan Rd., Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Burke, G.K. (2003, January 29–31). Jet grouting systems: Advantages and disadvantages. Proceedings of the GeoSupport 2004: Innovation and Cooperation in the Geo-Industry, Orlando, FL, USA.
2. Harada, K., Ohbayashi, J., Matsumoto, J., Kubo, Y., and Akima, T. (2015, January 9–13). New ground improvement technologies under restricted conditions in Japan. Proceedings of the 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Kyushu, Japan.
3. Ground improvement with jet grouting solutions at the new cruise terminal in Lisbon, Portugal10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.176 ↗
4. Jet-grouting in ground improvement and rotary grouting pile installation: Theoretical analysis
5. Numerical approach to predict ground displacement caused by installing a horizontal jet grout column10.1080/1064119X.2016.1273288 ↗
6. Impacts of free-floating bikesharing system on public transit ridership10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.014 ↗
7. Sensing data supported traffic flow prediction via denoising schemes and ANN: A comparison10.1109/JSEN.2020.3007809 ↗
8. Theoretical modelling of jet grouting10.1680/geot.2006.56.5.335 ↗
9. Numerical analysis of submerged flows for jet grouting10.1680/grim.14.00012 ↗
10. The process of development on jet grouting methods and their future
11. Recent advances in horizontal jet grouting (HJG): An overview10.1007/s13369-017-2752-3 ↗
12. A review of jet grouting practice and development10.1007/s12517-018-3809-7 ↗
13. Pinto, A., Falcão, J., Pinto, F., and Ribeiro, J. (2005, January 12–16). Ground improvement solutions using jet grouting columns. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan.
14. Dynamic prediction of jet grouted column diameter in soft soil using Bi-LSTM deep learning10.1007/s11440-020-01005-8 ↗
15. Generalized approach for prediction of jet grout column diameter10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000932 ↗
16. Effects of jet grouting slabs on responses for deep braced excavations10.1016/j.undsp.2020.02.002 ↗
17. Numerical study of the performance of jet grout piles for braced excavations in soft clay10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103631 ↗
18. Komaki, T., Fukada, S., Shimano, A., and Nakanishi, Y. (2018, January 24–26). Efficient of mechanical mixing method with middle pressure injection by high performance fluidizing agent. Proceedings of the 13th National Symposium on Ground Improvement, Kyoto, Japan.
19. Komaki, T., Fukada, S., Sumi, K., Nakanishi, Y., and Tanaka, N. (2018, January 24–26). Demonstration experiment of evolution technology by combination mixing slurry of middle pressure injection total system. Proceedings of the 53th Japan National Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, Takamatsu, Japan.
20. Inazumi, S., Shakya, S., Komaki, T., and Nakanishi, Y. (2021). Numerical analysis on performance of middle-pressure jet grouting method for ground improvement. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11080313 ↗
21. An attempt to apply mathematical foundation of Moving Particle Simulation to the MPS software “Particleworks”
22. MPS mesh-free particle method for multiphase flows10.1016/j.cma.2012.03.013 ↗
23. Multi-resolution MPS method10.1016/j.jcp.2017.12.042 ↗
24. Chang, K.H. (2014). Product Design Modeling using CAD/CAE: The Computer Aided Engineering Design Series, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-398513-2.00003-8 ↗
25. Software environment for CAD/CAE integration10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.07.003 ↗
26. MPS-CAE simulation on dynamic interaction between steel casing and existing pile when pulling out existing piles, International Journal of GEOMATE: Geotechnique
27. Computer-aided design-while-engineering technology in topdown modeling of mechanical product10.1016/j.compind.2015.05.004 ↗
28. DEM-FEM simulation of tire-sand interaction based on improved contact model10.1007/s40571-019-00293-6 ↗
29. Inazumi, S., Komaki, T., Nakanishi, Y., Hashida, H., and Suzuki, M. (2018, January 24–26). Qualities evaluation on high pressure Jet mixing ground improvement methods by distinct element method (DEM). Proceedings of the 13th National Symposium on Ground Improvement, Kyoto, Japan.
30. Shimano, A., Yamazaki, J., and Shinsaka, T. (2016). The study about work progress control of jet grouting method. Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Ground Improvement, JSMS.
31. Shinsaka, T., Yamazaki, J., Nakanishi, Y., and Komiya, K. (2018, January 5–10). Quality control and shape control techniques in jet grouting. Proceedings of the IFCEE 2018: Innovations in Ground Improvement for Soils, Pavements, and Subgrades, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1061/9780784481592.030 ↗
32. A new prediction method to rheological behavior of grout with bottom ash for jet grouting columns10.1016/j.sandf.2017.05.006 ↗
33. On the rheology of using geopolymer for grouting: A comparative study with cement-based grout included fly ash and cold bonded fly ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.140 ↗
34. Moving particle simulation for a simplified permeability model of pervious concrete