Show source-provided references
3. Yang, J., Yu, M., Qin, H., Lu, M., and Yang, C. (2019). A Twitter Data Credibility Framework—Hurricane Harvey as a Use Case. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.
10.3390/ijgi8030111 ↗4. Cooper, G.P., Yeager, V., Burkle, F.M., and Subbarao, I. (2022). Twitter as a Potential Disaster Risk Reduction Tool. Part III: Evaluating Variables that Promoted Regional Twitter Use for At-risk Populations During the 2013 Hattiesburg F4 Tornado. PLoS Curr., 7.
6. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. (2007, January 12–15). Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities. Proceedings of the WebKDD/SNA-KDD ’07: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, WebKDD/SNA-KDD ’07, San Jose, CA, USA.
10.1145/1348549.1348556 ↗8. Samuel, J., Garvey, M., and Kashyap, R. (2020). That Message Went Viral?! Exploratory Analytics and Sentiment Analysis into the Propagation of Tweets. arXiv.
9. Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age
10. Dongo, I., Cadinale, Y., Aguilera, A., Martínez, F., Quintero, Y., and Barrios, S. (December, January 30). Web Scraping versus Twitter API: A Comparison for a Credibility Analysis. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services, iiWAS ’20, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
11. A qualitative and quantitative comparison between Web scraping and API methods for Twitter credibility analysis
10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0037 ↗12. Hashemi, M. (2022, July 15). The Infrastructure Behind Twitter: Scale. Available online: https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/.
13. Markatos, E., Balzarotti, D., Almgren, M., Athanasopoulos, E., Bos, H., Cavallaro, L., Ioannidis, S., Lindorfer, M., Maggi, F., and Minchev, Z. (2013). The Red Book, Chalmers Research.
14. Mahir, E.M., Akhter, S., and Huq, M.R. (2019, January 28–30). Detecting Fake News using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms. Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Smart Computing & Communications (ICSCC), Sarawak, Malaysia.
15. Hassan, E.A., and Meziane, F. (2019, January 21–23). A Survey on Automatic Fake News Identification Techniques for Online and Socially Produced Data. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), Khartoum, Sudan.
10.1109/ICCCEEE46830.2019.9070857 ↗17. Ma, J., Gao, W., and Wong, K.F. (2019, January 13–17). Detect Rumors on Twitter by Promoting Information Campaigns with Generative Adversarial Learning. Proceedings of the WWW ’19: The World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/3308558.3313741 ↗18. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Flammini, A., and Menczer, F. (2016, January 11–15). Hoaxy: A Platform for Tracking Online Misinformation. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web; International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee: Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, WWW ’16 Companion, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10.1145/2872518.2890098 ↗19. Read All About It: The Politicization of “Fake News” on Twitter
20. Murayama, T., Wakamiya, S., Aramaki, E., and Kobayashi, R. (2021). Modeling the spread of fake news on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 16.
10.1371/journal.pone.0250419 ↗21. Mehrotra, R., Sanner, S., Buntine, W., and Xie, L. (August, January 28). Improving LDA Topic Models for Microblogs via Tweet Pooling and Automatic Labeling. Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland.
22. Dongo, I., Cardinale, Y., and Aguilera, A. (2019, January 20–22). Credibility Analysis for Available Information Sources on the Web: A Review and a Contribution. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), Rome, Italy.
10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987623 ↗24. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P., Castillo, C., and Meier, P. (2014, January 11–13). Tweetcred: Real-time credibility assessment of content on twitter. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics, Barcelona, Spain.
10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_16 ↗25. Liu, X., Nourbakhsh, A., Li, Q., Fang, R., and Shah, S. (2015, January 18–23). Real-time rumor debunking on twitter. Proceedings of the International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Melbourne, Australia.
10.1145/2806416.2806651 ↗26. AlRubaian, M., Al-Qurishi, M., Al-Rakhami, M., Hassan, M.M., and Alamri, A. (2016, January 18–21). CredFinder: A real-time tweets credibility assessing system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752431 ↗27. Namihira, Y., Segawa, N., Ikegami, Y., Kawai, K., Kawabe, T., and Tsuruta, S. (2013, January 2–5). High Precision Credibility Analysis of Information on Twitter. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems, Kyoto, Japan.
10.1109/SITIS.2013.148 ↗28. Hamdi, T., Slimi, H., Bounhas, I., and Slimani, Y. (2020, January 9–12). A Hybrid Approach for Fake News Detection in Twitter Based on User Features and Graph Embedding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing and Internet Technology, Bhubaneswar, India.
10.1007/978-3-030-36987-3_17 ↗29. Tan, S. (2017). Spot the Lie: Detecting Untruthful Online Opinion on Twitter. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College London].
31. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., and Poblete, B. (April, January 28). Information credibility on twitter. Proceedings of the International Conference on WWW, Hyderabad, India.
36. Huang, J., Thornton, K., and Efthimiadis, E. (2020, January 13–16). Conversational Tagging in Twitter. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT), Toronto, ON, Canada.
37. Godin, F., Slavkovikj, V., De Neve, W., Schrauwen, B., and Van de Walle, R. (2013, January 13–17). Using topic models for Twitter hashtag recommendation. Proceedings of the WWW ’13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
10.1145/2487788.2488002 ↗40. Ma, Z., Dou, W., Wang, X., and Akella, S. (2020, January 14–17). Tag-Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Understanding Hashtags and Their Relationships. Proceedings of the WI-IAT ’13: 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT)—Volume 01, Melbourne, Australia.
10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.38 ↗42. Verasakulvong, E., Vateekul, P., Piyatumrong, A., and Sangkeettrakarn, C. (2018, January 11–13). Online Emerging Topic Detection on Twitter Using Random Forest with Stock Indicator Features. Proceedings of the 2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Nakhonpathom, Thailand.
10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457349 ↗43. Lee, K., Palsetia, D., Narayanan, R., Patwary, M.d.M.A., Agrawal, A., and Choudhary, A. (2011, January 11). Twitter Trending Topic Classification. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
10.1109/ICDMW.2011.171 ↗46. A Credibility Analysis System for Assessing Information on Twitter
47. Jain, A.K., and Dubes, R.C. (1988). Algorithms for Clustering Data, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
48. Modified sequential k-means clustering by utilizing response: A case study for fashion products
10.1111/exsy.12226 ↗51. Hofmann, T. (1999, January 15–19). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Proceedings of the SIGIR ’99: 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, USA.
10.1145/312624.312649 ↗54. Intelligent Intrusion Detection in Computer Networks using Swarm Intelligence
55. Latent dirichlet allocation
56. Gimpel, K. (2006). Modeling Topics, Technical Report; Carnegie Melon University.
57. Kalyanam, J., Quezada, M., Poblete, B., and Lanckriet, G. (2016). Prediction and Characterization of High-Activity Events in Social Media Triggered by Real-World News. PLoS ONE, 11.
10.1371/journal.pone.0166694 ↗58. Godbole, S., and Sarawagi, S. (2004). Discriminative Methods for Multi-labeled Classification. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_5 ↗59. Xin, E.Z., Murthy, D., Lakuduva, N.S., and Stephens, K.K. (2019, January 19–21). Assessing the Stability of Tweet Corpora for Hurricane Events Over Time: A Mixed Methods Approach. Proceedings of the SMSociety ’19: 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
10.1145/3328529.3328545 ↗62. Dingemans, S. (2020). Application of Short Text Topic Modelling Techniques to Greta Thunberg Discussion on Twitter. [Master’s Thesis, National College of Ireland].
63. Hawking, S. (1988). Hellinger Distance—Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS.
64. Brandmaier, A. (2011). Permutation Distribution Clustering and Structural Equation Model Trees, University of Saarland. Technical Report, Science and TechnologyFaculties.
65. Lupa, J.C. (2021). Análisis de Credibilidad en la Red Social Twitter a través de su Actividad Social. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Católica San Pablo].
66. Mandical, R.R., Mamatha, N., Shivakumar, N., Monica, R., and Krishna, A.N. (2020, January 2–4). Identification of Fake News Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), Bangalore, India.
10.1109/CONECCT50063.2020.9198610 ↗67. Aphiwongsophon, S., and Chongstitvatana, P. (2018, January 18–21). Detecting Fake News with Machine Learning Method. Proceedings of the 2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Chiang Rai, Thailand.
10.1109/ECTICon.2018.8620051 ↗68. Ahmed, A.A.A., Aljabouh, A., Donepudi, P.K., and Choi, M.S. (2021). Detecting Fake News Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. arXiv.
69. Zubiaga, A., Zubiaga, A., Hoi, G.W.S., Liakata, M., and Procter, R. (2016). PHEME dataset of rumours and non-rumours. Figshare.