journal article·2022-06-27Open access

Comparisons of Tidal Currents in the Pearl River Estuary between High-Frequency Radar Data and Model Simulations

Langfeng Zhu, Tianyi Lu, Fan Yang, Bin Liu, Lunyu Wu, Jun Wei

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 13

Abstract

High-frequency (HF) radar data, derived from a pair of newly developed radar stations in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) of China, were validated through comparison with in situ surface buoys, ADCP measurements, and model simulations in this study. Since no in situ observations are available in the radar observing domain, a regional high-resolution ocean model covering the entire PRE and its adjacent seas was first established and validated with in situ measurements, and then the HF radar data quality was examined against the model simulations. The results show that mean flows and tidal ellipses derived from the in situ buoys and ADCP were in very good agreement with the model. The model–radar data comparison indicated that the radar obtained the best data quality within the central overlapping area between the two radar stations, with the errors increasing toward the coast and the open ocean. Near the coast, the radar data quality was affected by coastlines and islands that prevent HF radar from delivering high-quality information for determining surface currents. This is one of the major drawbacks of the HF radar technique. Toward the open ocean, where the wind is the only dominant forcing on the tidal currents, we found that the poor data quality was most likely contaminated by data inversion algorithms from the Shangchuan radar station. A hybrid machine-learning-based inversion algorithm including traditional electromagnetic analysis and physical oceanography factors is needed to develop and improve radar data quality. A new radar observing network with about 10 radar stations is developing in the PRE and its adjacent shelf, this work assesses the data quality of the existing radars and identifies the error sources, serving as the first step toward the full deployment of the entire radar network.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes · Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing · Underwater Acoustics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 519082, China

Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China

Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean System, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 519082, China

Zhuhai Marine Environmental Monitoring Central Station of the State Oceanic Administration, Zhuhai 519000, China

Bureau of Hydrology and Water Resources, Pearl River Water Resources Commission of Ministry of Water Resources, Guangzhou 510520, China

National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Beijing 100081, China

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai)

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Seasonal Variation and Dynamics of the Pearl River Plume10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.006 ↗
2. Pan, J., Lai, W., and Thomas Devlin, A. (2020). Circulations in the Pearl river estuary: Observation and modeling. Estuaries and Coastal Zones—Dynamics and Response to Environmental Changes, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.91058 ↗
3. Numerical Model of Tides in Pearl River Estuary with Moving Boundary10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:1(21) ↗
4. Numerical Simulation of the Residual Current during the Dry Season in the Lingdingyang Bay, China
5. Tides and Tidal Currents in the Pearl River Estuary10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.008 ↗
6. A Model Study of the Circulation in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and Its Adjacent Coastal Waters: 1. Simulations and Comparison with Observations
7. A Model Study of the Circulation in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and Its Adjacent Coastal Waters: 2. Sensitivity Experiments
8. Numerical Study of the Tide and Tidal Dynamics in the South China Sea10.1016/j.dsr.2007.10.007 ↗
9. Tidally Averaged Water and Salt Transport Velocities and Their Distributions in the Pearl River Estuary10.1007/s10236-016-0975-6 ↗
10. Process-Oriented Study of the River Plume and Circulation in the Pearl River Estuary: Response to the Wind and Tidal Forcing
11. On the Role of Wind and Tide in Generating Variability of Pearl River Plume during Summer in a Coupled Wide Estuary and Shelf System10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.005 ↗
12. HF Radar Instruments, Past to Present10.5670/oceanog.1997.19 ↗
13. High-Frequency Radar Observations of Ocean Surface Currents10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172315 ↗
14. Doppler Spectrum of Sea Echo at 13.56 Mc./s10.1038/175681a0 ↗
15. Least-Squares Methods for the Extraction of Surface Currents from CODAR Crossed-Loop Data: Application at ARSLOE10.1109/JOE.1983.1145578 ↗
16. Extraction of Sea State from HF Radar Sea Echo: Mathematical Theory and Modeling10.1029/RS021i001p00081 ↗
17. Introduction to High-Frequency Radar: Reality and Myth10.5670/oceanog.1997.18 ↗
18. SeaSonde Radial Velocities: Derivation and Internal Consistency10.1109/JOE.2006.886104 ↗
19. HF Radar Performance in a Low-Energy Environment: CODAR Seasonde Experience on the West Florida Shelf10.1175/2010JTECHO720.1 ↗
20. Assessment of CODAR SeaSonde and WERA HF Radars in Mapping Surface Currents on the West Florida Shelf10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00107.1 ↗
21. Venkatesan, R., Tandon, A., D’Asaro, E., and Atmanand, M. (2018). Data return aspects of CODAR and WERA high-frequency radars in mapping currents. Observing the Oceans in Real Time. Springer Oceanography, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-66493-4 ↗
22. Surface Circulation in Block Island Sound and Adjacent Coastal and Shelf Regions: A FVCOM-CODAR Comparison10.1016/j.pocean.2016.02.005 ↗
23. Comparison of Observed (HF Radar, ADCP) and Model Barotropic Tidal Currents in the New York Bight and Block Island Sound10.1016/j.ecss.2006.10.011 ↗
24. Blending HF Radar and Model Velocities in Monterey Bay through Normal Mode Analysis10.1029/1999JC900295 ↗
25. Super-Resolution Ocean Surface Current Algorithm Based on MUSIC for OSMAR2000
26. Postprocessing of Ocean Surface Radial Current Mapping of OSMAR2000
27. A New High-Resolution Unstructured Grid Finite Volume Arctic Ocean Model (AO-FVCOM): An Application for Tidal Studies10.1029/2008JC004941 ↗
28. A Finite Volume Numerical Approach for Coastal Ocean Circulation Studies: Comparisons with Finite Difference Models10.1029/2006JC003485 ↗
29. An Unstructured Grid, Finite-Volume, Three-Dimensional, Primitive Equations Ocean Model: Application to Coastal Ocean and Estuaries10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0159:AUGFVT>2.0.CO;2 ↗
30. General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2 ↗
31. Impact of Multichannel River Network on the Plume Dynamics in the Pearl River Estuary10.1002/2014JC010490 ↗
32. Downwelling Wind, Tides, and Estuarine Plume Dynamics10.1002/2015JC011475 ↗
33. Efficient Inverse Modeling of Barotropic Ocean Tides10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2 ↗
34. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 210.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1 ↗
35. Performance Assessment for an Operational Ocean Model of the Taiwan Strait10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.04.006 ↗
36. On the Validation of Models10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 ↗
37. Evaluation of a Coastal Ocean Circulation Model for the Columbia River Plume in Summer 2004
38. HF Radar Comparisons with Moored Estimates of Current Speed and Direction: Expected Differences and Implications10.1029/97JC01190 ↗
39. A Neural Network Method for Retrieving Sea Surface Wind Speed for C-Band SAR10.3390/rs14092269 ↗
40. A Convolutional Neural Network Using Surface Data to Predict Subsurface Temperatures in the Pacific Ocean10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2955957 ↗
41. Thongniran, N., Vateekul, P., Jitkajornwanich, K., Lawawirojwong, S., and Srestasathiern, P. (2019, January 10–12). Spatio-temporal deep learning for ocean current prediction based on HF radar data. Proceedings of the JCSSE 2019—16th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering: Knowledge Evolution towards Singularity of Man-Machine Intelligence, Amari Pattaya, Thailand.10.1109/JCSSE.2019.8864215 ↗
42. Thongniran, N., Jitkajornwanich, K., Lawawirojwong, S., Srestasathiern, P., and Vateekul, P. (2019, January 23–25). Combining attentional CNN and GRU networks for ocean current prediction based on HF radar observations. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition, Beijing, China.10.1145/3373509.3373549 ↗
43. Wind-Speed Inversion from HF Radar First-Order Backscatter Signal10.1007/s10236-011-0465-9 ↗