Show source-provided references
1. Shepherd, M.K., and Rouse, E.J. (June, January 29). Design of a quasi-passive ankle-foot prosthesis with biomimetic, variable stiffness. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Singapore.
10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989788 ↗4. Tryggvason, H., Starker, F., Lecomte, C., and Jonsdottir, F. (2020). Use of dynamic FEA for design modification and energy analysis of a variable stiffness prosthetic foot. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10020650 ↗8. Au, S.K., Weber, J., and Herr, H. (2007, January 13–15). Biomechanical design of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428441 ↗9. Au, S.K., Herr, H., Weber, J., and Martinez-Villalpando, E.C. (2007, January 23–26). Powered ankle-foot prosthesis for the improvement of amputee ambulation. Proceedings of the 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France.
10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352965 ↗15. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking
10.1186/1743-0003-10-49 ↗19. Bellman, R.D., Holgate, M.A., and Sugar, T.G. (2008, January 19–22). SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics. Proceedings of the 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762887 ↗21. Sup, F., Varol, H.A., Mitchell, J., Withrow, T., and Goldfarb, M. (2008, January 19–22). Design and control of an active electrical knee and ankle prosthesis. Proceedings of the 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762811 ↗23. Zhu, J., Wang, Q., and Wang, L. (2010, January 6–9). PANTOE 1: Biomechanical design of powered ankle-foot prosthesis with compliant joints and segmented foot. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10.1109/AIM.2010.5695879 ↗25. Zhu, J., Wang, Q., Li, X., Sun, W., She, H., and Huang, Q. (2015, January 6–9). Importance of series elasticity in a powered transtibial prosthesis with ankle and toe joints. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Zhuhai, China.
10.1109/ROBIO.2015.7418824 ↗26. PANTOE II: Improved Version of a Powered Transtibial Prosthesis with Ankle and Toe Joints
28. Cherelle, P., Matthys, A., Grosu, V., Vanderborght, B., and Lefeber, D. (2012, January 24–27). The amp-foot 2.0: Mimicking intact ankle behavior with a powered transtibial prosthesis. Proceedings of the 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy,.
10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290783 ↗29. Grosu, S., Cherelle, P., Verheul, C., Vanderborght, B., and Lefeber, D. (2013, January 1–4). AMP-Foot 2.0 prosthesis dynamic behavior, preliminary computational multibody dynamics simulation results. Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multi-Body Dynamics, Zagreb, Croatia.
30. Madusanka, D., Wijayasingha, L., Sanjeevan, K., Ahamed, M., Edirisooriya, J., and Gopura, R. (2014, January 22–24). A 3DOF transtibial robotic prosthetic limb. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
10.1109/ICIAFS.2014.7069617 ↗34. Combining push-off power and nonlinear damping behaviors for a lightweight motor-driven transtibial prosthesis
10.1109/TMECH.2017.2766205 ↗35. Gao, F., Liu, Y., and Liao, W.H. (201, January 3–7). A new powered ankle-foot prosthesis with compact parallel spring mechanism. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Qingdao, China.
10.1109/ROBIO.2016.7866367 ↗36. Design of powered ankle-foot prosthesis with nonlinear parallel spring mechanism
10.1115/1.4039385 ↗37. Rad, N.F., Yousefi-Koma, A., Tajdari, F., and Ayati, M. (2016, January 26–28). Design of a novel three degrees of freedom ankle prosthesis inspired by human anatomy. Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICROM), Tehran, Iran.
10.1109/ICRoM.2016.7886776 ↗38. Biologically inspired design and development of a variable stiffness powered ankle-foot prosthesis
10.1115/1.4043603 ↗39. Design and Control of a Compliant Electro-Hydrostatic-Powered Ankle Prosthesis
41. Gabert, L., Tran, M., and Lenzi, T. (2021, January 1–5). Design of an underactuated powered ankle and toe prosthesis. Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Virtual, Mexico.
10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629842 ↗42. Design and preliminary results of a reaction force series elastic actuator for bionic knee and ankle prostheses
10.1109/TMRB.2021.3098921 ↗43. Self-Contained 2-DOF Ankle-Foot Prosthesis With Low-Inertia Extremity for Agile Walking on Uneven Terrain
10.1109/LRA.2021.3098931 ↗45. Hansen, A., and Starker, F. (2017). Prosthetic foot principles and their influence on gait. Handbook of Human Motion, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_74 ↗46. Grimmer, M. (2015). Powered Lower Limb Prostheses. [Ph.D. Thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz].
47. Ficanha, E.M., and Rastgaar, M. (August, January 12). Preliminary design and evaluation of a multi-axis ankle-foot prosthesis. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Sao Paolo, Brazil.
48. Evaluation of the subtalar joint during gait using 3-D motion analysis: Does the STJ achieve neutral position?
49. A public dataset of overground and treadmill walking kinematics and kinetics in healthy individuals
10.7717/peerj.4640 ↗52. Gray, H. (2015). Gray’s Anatomy: With Original Illustrations by Henry Carter, Arcturus Publishing Ltd.
54. The mechanics of the foot: I. The joints
57. Merlette, J.B. (2001). Foot Prosthesis. (6,261,324), U.S. Patent.
58. Smith, N., Rush, D., and Williams, N. (2005). Multi-Axial Prosthetic Foot. (10/663,514), U.S. Patent.
59. Clausen, A.V., Ragnarsdottir, H.G., Lecomte, C., and Thorhallsdottir, H. (2008). Foot Prosthesis with Resilient Multi-Axial Ankle. (7,347,877), U.S. Patent.
60. Lecomte, C.G., Thorhallsdottir, H., Ragnarsdottir, H.G., and Clausen, A.V. (2010). Foot Prosthesis with Resilient Multi-Axial Ankle. (7,846,213), U.S. Patent.
61. Lecomte, C.G., Thorhallsdottir, H., Ragnarsdottir, H.G., and Clausen, A.V. (2011). Foot Prosthesis with Resilient Multi-Axial Ankle. (8,025,699), U.S. Patent.
62. Harrison, N.F. (1911). Ankle-Joint. (1,001,641), U.S. Patent.
63. Kaiser, W.F. (1939). Artificial Ankle Joint. (2,183,076), U.S. Patent.
64. Georg, G. (1952). Artificial Foot with Ankle-joint. (2,620,485), U.S. Patent.
65. Carl, W. (1956). Ankle Joint for Artificial Limbs. (2,731,645), U.S. Patent.
66. Cornelius, C.J. (1996). Prosthetic Ankle Joint for Pivotally Connecting a Residual Limb to a Prosthetic Foot. (5,571,212), U.S. Patent.
67. Farneth, C.S. (1965). Ankle Joint for Artificial Limb. (3,196,463), U.S. Patent.
68. Mccoy, A.J. (1995). Articulated Ankle Joint with Inner and Outer Races for Universal Movement. (5,405,411), U.S. Patent.
69. Christensen, R.J. (2010). Multi-Axial Prosthetic Ankle. (7,794,506), U.S. Patent.
73. Knox, E.H. (1996). The Role of Prosthetic Feet in Walking, Northwestern University.
74. Tabucol, J., Brugo, T.M., Povolo, M., Leopaldi, M., Oddsson, M., Carloni, R., and Zucchelli, A. (2022). Structural FEA-Based Design and Functionality Verification Methodology of Energy-Storing-and-Releasing Prosthetic Feet. Appl. Sci., 12.
10.3390/app12010097 ↗75. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor
10.3109/03093649709164527 ↗76. Erratum: Gait analysis and energy consumption of below-knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet (Gait and Posture (2000) 12 (162–168))
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.08.007 ↗77. Perception of walking difficulty by below-knee amputees using a conventional foot versus the flex-foot
80. With a Spring in one’s step
83. The amputee mobility predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate
10.1053/apmr.2002.32309 ↗87. Analysis of gait following below-knee amputation: A comparison of the SACH and single-axis foot
88. Below-knee amputation: A comparison of the effect of the SACH foot and single axis foot on electromyographic patterns during locomotion
10.3109/03093648609103074 ↗92. Physiological measurements of walking and running in people with transtibial amputations with 3 different prostheses
10.2519/jospt.1999.29.9.526 ↗95. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet
96. Comparison of energy cost and gait efficiency during ambulation in below-knee amputees using different prosthetic feet
97. Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot
10.1109/86.650279 ↗98. Efficiency of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet