Failure Pressure Prediction of Medium to High Toughness Pipe with Circumferential Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loadings Using Artificial Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
Assessment of a corroded pipe is crucial to determine when it must be repaired or replaced. However, the conventional corrosion assessment codes for the failure pressure predictions of corroded pipes with circumferentially aligned interacting defects are conservative (underestimations of more than 40%), resulting in premature repair or replacements of pipelines. Alternatively, numerical approaches may be used, but they are time consuming and computationally expensive. In this study, an analytical equation based on finite element analysis for the failure pressure prediction of API 5L X52, X65, and X80 corroded pipes with circumferentially aligned interacting corrosion defects subjected to combined loadings is proposed. An artificial neural network trained with failure pressure obtained from the finite element analysis of the three pipe grades for varied defect spacings, depths and lengths, and axial compressive stress were used to develop the equation. Subsequently, a parametric study on the effects of these parameters on the failure pressure of a corroded pipe with circumferential-interacting defects was conducted using the equation to determine the correlation between the defect geometries and failure pressure of the pipe. The new equations predicted failure pressures for these pipe grades with an R2 value of 0.99 and an error range of −9.92% to 0.98% for normalised defect spacings of 0.00 to 3.00, normalised effective defect lengths of 0.00 to 2.95, normalised effective defect depths of 0.00 to 0.80, and normalised axial compressive stress of 0.00 to 0.60.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
Funding
Yayasan Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS · Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Application of Markov modelling and Monte Carlo simulation technique in failure probability estimation—A consideration of corrosion defects of internally corroded pipelines10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.004 ↗
2. Finite element analyses of corroded pipeline with single defect subjected to internal pressure and axial compressive stress10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102746 ↗
3. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X ↗
4. Lo, M., Karuppanan, S., and Ovinis, M. (2021). Failure Pressure Prediction of a Corroded Pipeline with Longitudinally Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loadings Using FEM and ANN. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9030281 ↗
5. The Prediction of Failure Pressure of Gas Pipeline with Multi Corroded Region10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.3323 ↗
6. Kumar, S.V., Karuppanan, S., and Ovinis, M. (2021). Failure Pressure Prediction of High Toughness Pipeline with a Single Corrosion Defect Subjected to Combined Loadings Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Metals, 11.10.3390/met11020373 ↗
7. Kumar, S.D.V., Karuppanan, S., and Ovinis, M. (2021). An Empirical Equation for Failure Pressure Prediction of High Toughness Pipeline with Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loadings Based on Artificial Neural Network. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9202582 ↗
8. Burst Strength Analysis of Corroded Pipelines by Finite Element Method10.3923/jas.2011.1845.1850 ↗
9. Failure assessment of X80 pipeline with interacting corrosion defects10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.013 ↗
10. De Andrade, E.Q., Benjamin, A.C., Machado, P.R.S., Pereira, L.C., Jacob, B., Carneiro, E.G., Guerreiro, J.N.C., Silva, R.C.C., and Noronha, D.B. (2006, January 4–9). Finite Element Modeling of the Failure Behavior of Pipelines Containing Interacting Corrosion Defects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-OMAE, Hamburg, Germany.10.1115/OMAE2006-92600 ↗
11. Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviour of API 5L X65 Pipeline Steel at Room Temperature10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.263 ↗
12. DNV (2017). Recommended Practice DNV-RP-F101, DNV. no. May.
13. Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: Numerical studies and verification analyses10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.011 ↗
14. Cosham, A., and Hopkins, P. (2004, January 17–18). The Assessment of Corrosion in Pipeline-Guidance in the Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual (PDAM). Proceedings of the Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15. Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines—Corrosion10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.035 ↗
16. The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.02.010 ↗
17. Chauhan, V., Swankie, T.D., Espiner, R., and Wood, I. (2009, January 4–7). Developments in Methods for Assessing the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines. Proceedings of the NACE Corrosion 2009 Conference Expo, Houston, TX, USA. No. 09115.
18. Effect of interaction between corrosion defects on failure pressure of thin wall steel pipeline10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.01.002 ↗
19. Assessment of Remaining Useful Life of Pipelines Using Different Artificial Neural Networks Models10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000886 ↗
20. An ANN-based failure pressure prediction method for buried high-strength pipes with stray current corrosion defect10.1002/ese3.522 ↗
21. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm10.1109/72.329697 ↗
22. A comparison between performance of support vector regression and artificial neural network in prediction of pipe burst rate in water distribution networks10.1007/s12205-014-0537-8 ↗
23. Artificial neural network models for predicting condition of offshore oil and gas pipelines10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.003 ↗
24. Probabilistic analysis of corroded pipelines based on a new failure pressure model10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.050 ↗
25. Load-carrying capacity of locally corroded steel plate girder ends using artificial neural network10.1016/j.tws.2015.12.007 ↗
26. Assessment by finite element modeling of the interaction of multiple corrosion defects and the effect on failure pressure of corroded pipelines10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.040 ↗
27. Residual Strength Calculation & Residual Life Prediction of General Corrosion Pipeline10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.045 ↗
28. Structural integrity analysis of pipelines with interacting corrosion defects by multiphysics modeling10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.009 ↗
29. Kumar, S.D.V., Karuppanan, S., and Ovinis, M. (2022). Artificial Neural Network-Based Failure Pressure Prediction of API 5L X80 Pipeline with Circumferentially Aligned Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loadings. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15062259 ↗
30. Burst capacity analysis of pipeline with multiple longitudinally aligned interacting corrosion defects subjected to internal pressure and axial compressive stress10.1007/s42452-020-2994-7 ↗
31. ANSYS (2019). ANSYS Theory Reference, ANSYS Inc.
32. State evaluation of a corroded pipeline10.1080/20464177.2016.1224615 ↗
33. Engineering critical analyses to BS 7910—The UK guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00011-4 ↗
34. Prediction of the failure pressure for complex corrosion defects10.1016/S0308-0161(02)00020-0 ↗
35. Failure Pressure Estimations for Pipes with Combined Corrosion Defects on the External Surface: A Comparative Study10.20964/2017.11.86 ↗
36. Bjørnøy, O.H., Sigurdsson, G., and Cramer, E. (June, January 28). Residual Strength of Corroded Pipelines, DNV Test Results. Proceedings of the Tenth (2000) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.
37. Benjamin, A.C., Freire, J.L.F., Vieira, R.D., Diniz, J.L.C., and de Andrade, E.Q. (2005, January 12–17). Burst Tests on Pipeline Containing Interacting Corrosion Defects. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2005), Halkidiki, Greece.10.1115/OMAE2005-67059 ↗
38. Failure pressure prediction of pipeline with single corrosion defect using artificial neural network
39. Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.006 ↗
40. Gurney, K. (1997). An Introduction to Neural Networks, UCL Press.10.4324/9780203451519 ↗
41. Prediction of failure stages for double lap joints using finite element analysis and artificial neural networks10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.042 ↗
42. Kumar, S.D.V., Kai, M.L.Y., Arumugam, T., and Karuppanan, S. (2021). A Review of Finite Element Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks as Failure Pressure Prediction Tools for Corroded Pipelines. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14206135 ↗
43. Alang, N.A., Razak, N.A., Shafie, K.A., and Sulaiman, A. (2013, January 16–21). Finite Element Analysis on Burst Pressure of Steel Pipes with Corrosion Defects. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Fracture, Beijing, China. no. 1.