journal article·2021-12-08Open access

Evaluation of Autonomous Mowers Weed Control Effect in Globe Artichoke Field

Lorenzo Gagliardi, Mino Sportelli, Christian Frasconi, Michel Pirchio, Andrea Peruzzi, Michele Raffaelli, Marco Fontanelli

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

The development of a fully automated robotic weeder is currently hindered by the lack of a reliable technique for weed-crop detection. Autonomous mowers moving with random trajectories rely on simplified computational resources and have shown potential when applied for agricultural purposes. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of these autonomous mowers for weed control in globe artichoke. A first trial consisting of the comparison of the performances of three different autonomous mowers (AM1, AM2 and AM3) was carried out evaluating percentage of area mowed and primary energy consumption. The most suitable autonomous mower was tested for its weed control effect and compared with a conventional weed management system. Average weeds height, weed cover percentage, above-ground weed biomass, artichoke yield, primary energy consumption and cost were assessed. All the autonomous mowers achieved a percentage of area mowed around the 80% after 180 min. AM2 was chosen as the best compromise for weed control in the artichoke field (83.83% of area mowed after 180 min of mowing, and a consumption of 430.50 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1). The autonomous mower weed management achieved a higher weed control effect (weed biomass of 71.76 vs. 143.67 g d.m.⋅m−2), a lower energy consumption (430.5 vs. 1135.13 kWh⋅ha−1⋅year−1), and a lower cost (EUR 2601.84 vs. EUR 3661.80 ha−1·year−1) compared to the conventional system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cynara cardunculus studies · Weed Control and Herbicide Applications · Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Robotics and Labour in Agriculture. A Context Consideration10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.013 ↗
2. Agricultural Robotics: Unmanned Robotic Service Units in Agricultural Tasks10.1109/MIE.2013.2252957 ↗
3. The Effect of Agricultural Technology on the Speed of Development10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.017 ↗
4. Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Survey and Current Challenges10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.12.005 ↗
5. Lessons from the Front Lines of the Agtech Revolution
6. Advances in Robotic Agriculture for Crops10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.05.010 ↗
7. Farmers’ Perspectives on Field Crop Robots—Evidence from Bavaria, Germany10.1016/j.compag.2021.106176 ↗
8. Real-Time Weed-Crop Classification and Localisation Technique for Robotic Weed Control in Lettuce10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.02.002 ↗
9. Smith, R., Klonsky, K., and De Moura, R. (2007). Sample Costs to Produce Iceberg Lettuce, University of California Cooperative Extension Publication.
10. Dusky, J.A., and Stall, W.M. (1995, January 22). Weed Management Practices for Lettuce Production Using Imazethapyr. Proceedings of the the 108th Florida State Horticultural Society, Lake Alfred, FL, USA.
11. Broccoli (Brassica Oleracea Var. Botrytis) Yield Loss from Italian Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne) Interference10.1017/S0043174500080917 ↗
12. Mennan, H., Jabran, K., Zandstra, B.H., and Pala, F. (2020). Non-Chemical Weed Management in Vegetables by Using Cover Crops: A Review. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10020257 ↗
13. Robotic Weeders Can Improve Weed Control Options for Specialty Crops10.1002/ps.5337 ↗
14. Turini, T., Stewart, D., and Murdock, J. (2018). Sample Costs to Produce Processing Tomatoes, Sub-Surface, Drip Irrigated (SDI), San Joaquin Valley South, Fresno County, UC Cooperative Extension-Agricultural Issues Center.
15. Technology for Automation of Weed Control in Specialty Crops10.1614/WT-D-16-00070.1 ↗
16. (2021, June 21). ROBOVATOR. Available online: Https://Www.Robovator.Com/.
17. Intrarow Weed Removal in Broccoli and Transplanted Lettuce with an Intelligent Cultivator10.1614/WT-D-15-00179.1 ↗
18. Development of a Systemic Crop Signalling System for Automated Real-Time Plant Care in Vegetable Crops10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.02.011 ↗
19. Crop Signalling: A Novel Crop Recognition Technique for Robotic Weed Control10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.09.011 ↗
20. Billingsley, J. (2019). The Use of Agricultural Robots in Weed Management and Control. Robotics and Automation for Improving Agriculture, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited.10.19103/AS.2019.0056 ↗
21. Vision Guided Precision Cultivation10.1023/A:1009963924920 ↗
22. Milioto, A., Lottes, P., and Stachniss, C. (2018, January 21). Real-Time Semantic Segmentation of Crop and Weed for Precision Agriculture Robots Leveraging Background Knowledge in CNNs. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460962 ↗
23. Slaughter, D.C., Giles, D.K., Fennimore, S.A., Nguyen, T.T., Vuong, V., Neilson, L., and Vannucci, B. (2021, June 22). Robotic Plant Care Systems and Methods: Google Patents. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2017181127A1/en.
24. Magni, S., Sportelli, M., Grossi, N., Volterrani, M., Minelli, A., Pirchio, M., Fontanelli, M., Frasconi, C., Gaetani, M., and Martelloni, L. (2020). Autonomous Mowing and Turf-Type Bermudagrass as Innovations for An Environment-Friendly Floor Management of a Vineyard in Coastal Tuscany. Agriculture, 10.10.3390/agriculture10050189 ↗
25. Sportelli, M., Frasconi, C., Fontanelli, M., Pirchio, M., Raffaelli, M., Magni, S., Caturegli, L., Volterrani, M., Mainardi, M., and Peruzzi, A. (2021). Autonomous Mowing and Complete Floor Cover for Weed Control in Vineyards. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11030538 ↗
26. Sportelli, M., Pirchio, M., Fontanelli, M., Volterrani, M., Frasconi, C., Martelloni, L., Caturegli, L., Gaetani, M., Grossi, N., and Magni, S. (2020). Autonomous Mowers Working in Narrow Spaces: A Possible Future Application in Agriculture?. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10040553 ↗
27. Functionality and Efficacy of Franklin Robotics’ TertillTM Robotic Weeder10.1017/wet.2020.94 ↗
28. Agricultural Robots for Field Operations. Part 2: Operations and Systems10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.11.004 ↗
29. A Survey on Coverage Path Planning for Robotics10.1016/j.robot.2013.09.004 ↗
30. (2019). Pergher; Gubiani; Mainardis Field Testing of a Biomass-Fueled Flamer for In-Row Weed Control in the Vineyard. Agriculture, 9.10.3390/agriculture9100210 ↗
31. Raffaelli, M., Filippi, F., Peruzzi, A., and Graifenberg, A. (2004, January 8). Flaming for Intra-Row Weed Control in Globe Artichoke. Proceedings of the 6th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, Lillehammer, Norway.
32. Artichoke (Cynara Scolymus L.) as Cash-Cover Crop in an Organic Vegetable System10.14720/aas.2015.105.1.06 ↗
33. FAO FAOSTAT (2021, September 15). Statistical Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
34. Calabrese, N. (2009). Impianto. Il Carciofo e il Cardo, Bayer Crop Science Inc., Script.
35. Husqvarna (2016). Husqvarna Automower 310/315 Operator’s Manual, Husqvarna AB.
36. Husqvarna (2018). Husqvarna Automower 520/550 Operator’s Manual, Husqvarna AB.
37. Husqvarna (2019). Husqvarna Automower 535 AWD Operator’s Manual, Husqvarna AB.
38. Orec (2008). Orec HR531 Operator’s Manual, Orec CO., LTD.
39. Martelloni, L., Fontanelli, M., Pieri, S., Frasconi, C., Caturegli, L., Gaetani, M., Grossi, N., Magni, S., Pirchio, M., and Raffaelli, M. (2019). Assessment of the Cutting Performance of a Robot Mower Using Custom Built Software. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9050230 ↗
40. Emlid (2021, August 31). A Reach RTK Docs. Available online: https://docs.emlid.com/reach/specs/.
41. Takasu, T. (2021, August 31). RTKLIB Ver. 2.4.2 Manual. Available online: http://www.rtklib.com/prog/manual_2.4.2.pdf.
42. (2021, September 01). Honda GX200, Horizontal Shaft Gasoline (Petrol) Engine Manual. Available online: https://www.honda-engines-eu.com›TS_GX200.
43. (2021, September 01). Hoepli, Manuali Hoepli.It. Available online: https://www.manualihoepli.it/media/doc/pr243.pdf.
44. Pirchio, M., Fontanelli, M., Labanca, F., Sportelli, M., Frasconi, C., Martelloni, L., Raffaelli, M., Peruzzi, A., Gaetani, M., and Magni, S. (2019). Energetic Aspects of Turfgrass Mowing: Comparison of Different Rotary Mowing Systems. Agriculture, 9.10.3390/agriculture9080178 ↗
45. ISPRA—Istituto Superiore per La Protezione e La Ricerca Ambientale (2021, September 01). Rapporti 343/2021, Available online: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2021/pubblicazioni/rapporti/r343-2021.pdf.
46. Valøen, L.O., and Shoesmith, M.I. (2007, January 1–2). The Effect of PHEV and HEV Duty Cycles on Battery and Battery Pack Performance. Proceedings of the The PHEV 2007 Conference: Where the Grid Meets the Road, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
47. R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
48. Ritz, C., Baty, F., Streibig, J.C., and Gerhard, D. (2015). Dose-Response Analysis Using R. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0146021 ↗
49. Ritz, C., Strebig, J.C., and The Comprehensive R Archive Network (2016). Asymptotic Regression Model. Analysis of Dose-Response Curves.
50. Sheley, R. (2017). Mowing to Manage Noxious Weeds. Ext. Serv. MontGuide, MT200104AG.
51. Mitigating Crop Yield Losses through Weed Diversity10.1038/s41893-019-0415-y ↗
52. Pirchio, M., Fontanelli, M., Frasconi, C., Martelloni, L., Raffaelli, M., Peruzzi, A., Gaetani, M., Magni, S., Caturegli, L., and Volterrani, M. (2018). Autonomous Mower vs. Rotary Mower: Effects on Turf Quality and Weed Control in Tall Fescue Lawn. Agronomy, 8.10.3390/agronomy8020015 ↗
53. Autonomous Mower Saves Energy and Improves Quality of Tall Fescue Lawn10.21273/HORTTECH03483-16 ↗
54. Antichi, D., Sbrana, M., Martelloni, L., Abou Chehade, L., Fontanelli, M., Raffaelli, M., Mazzoncini, M., Peruzzi, A., and Frasconi, C. (2019). Agronomic Performances of Organic Field Vegetables Managed with Conservation Agriculture Techniques: A Study from Central Italy. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9120810 ↗
55. Effect of Cover Crops and Mulches on Weed Control and Nitrogen Fertilization in Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.)10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.001 ↗
56. Chand, A.A., Prasad, K.A., Mar, E., Dakai, S., Mamun, K.A., Islam, F.R., Mehta, U., and Kumar, N.M. (2021). Design and Analysis of Photovoltaic Powered Battery-Operated Computer Vision-Based Multi-Purpose Smart Farming Robot. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11030530 ↗
57. Smart Farming: Agriculture’s Shift from a Labor Intensive to Technology Native Industry10.1016/j.iot.2019.100142 ↗
58. Saiz-Rubio, V., and Rovira-Más, F. (2020). From Smart Farming towards Agriculture 5.0: A Review on Crop Data Management. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10020207 ↗
59. Home Gardening Practice in Pune (India), the Role of Communities, Urban Environment and the Contribution to Urban Sustainability10.1007/s11252-019-00921-2 ↗
60. Energy-Environmental Assessment of the UIA-OpenAgri Case Study as Urban Regeneration Project through Agriculture10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138819 ↗
61. Features and Functions of Multifunctional Urban Agriculture in the Global North: A Review10.3389/fsufs.2020.562513 ↗
62. FAO (1999). Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture. FAO.
63. Urban Agriculture—A Necessary Pathway towards Urban Resilience and Global Sustainability?10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055 ↗
64. Monitoring the Contribution of Urban Agriculture to Urban Sustainability: An Indicator-Based Framework10.1016/j.scs.2021.103130 ↗