journal article·2021-11-19Open access

Interdisciplinary Urban Tunnel Control within Smart Cities

Ondřej Přibyl, Pavel Přibyl, Miroslav Svítek

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 22

Abstract

Nowadays, urban road tunnels are considered to be independent entities within a city. Their interactions with the rest of the city and vice versa are usually not considered and, if they are, are only considered in a limited way (for example, through the nearest traffic controller). Typically, only the traffic parameters and not the environmental impacts are considered. This paper has two major objectives. First, we provide a systemic view on a road urban tunnel. The major focus is on the interfaces between the tunnel and the rest of the city and the way they will be managed. We are providing a tool to take into consideration a sustainable development of a tunnel (i.e., not only traffic flow parameters such as average speed, but also environmental and societal characteristics). This model expresses the actual traffic situation in a monetary form (i.e., cost of congestions). The second objective is to provide a new road urban tunnel control approach that follows the original methodology and systemic view described in the paper. If the tunnel is controlled autonomously, which corresponds to the current state-of-the-art in many cities, the algorithm decides to close it based on only local parameters. However, the proposed new algorithm takes into consideration not only the traffic situation in the tunnel (expressed by the parameter traffic density), but also the actual traffic situation within the city (expressed by its level of service (LOS)). This allows more environmentally, socially and economically sustainable oriented road urban tunnel management. The described algorithm is demonstrated on a specific example of the tunnel complex Blanka in Prague.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Traffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University in Prague, Konviktská 20, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic

Funding

European regional development fund

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014 ↗
2. Schmitz, P. (2021, November 01). PIARC Road Tunnels Manual. PIARC. Available online: https://tunnelsmanual.piarc.org/en.
3. Rzevski, G., and Skobelev, P. (2014). Managing Complexity, WIT Press.10.4271/1845649362 ↗
4. Grösser, S.N. (2017). Complexity management and system dynamics thinking. Dynamics of Long-Life Assets, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45438-2 ↗
5. PIARC (2013, January 23–25). Technical committee 3.3 road tunnel operation. Proceedings of the Road Tunnels: Complex Underground Road Networks (2016R19EN), Da Nang, Vietnam.
6. Flint, R.W. (2012). Basics of Sustainable Development. Practice of Sustainable Community Development, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5100-6 ↗
7. Dong, Y., Xu, J., Liu, X., Gao, C., Ru, H., and Duan, Z. (2019). Carbon emissions and expressway traffic flow patterns in China. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11102824 ↗
8. Computer networking layers based on the OSI model
9. Towards information circuits
10. Smart city design based on an ontological knowledge system10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_12 ↗
11. Coupling models of road tunnel traffic, ventilation and evacuation10.3846/transport.2020.12079 ↗
12. Svítek, M. (2021). Information Physics-Physics-Information Analogies for Complex Systems Modelling, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-91011-8.00007-X ↗
13. A traffic congestion assessment method for urban road networks based on speed performance index10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.277 ↗
14. Přibyl, P., Přibyl, O., Faltus, V., Hrdina, L., and Matowicki, M. (2019). Methodology for determining price of congestions in Prague (in Czech-Metodika Kvantitativního hodnocení kongescii V HL. M. PRAZE). Res. Rep., 51.
15. Computational intelligence in highway management: A review10.7307/ptt.v27i5.1667 ↗
16. Anatomy of tunnel congestion: Causes and implications for tunnel traffic management10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.015 ↗
17. Effects of highway management on traffic flow characteristics
18. Systémové modelování přínosů tunelu Blanka
19. Critical discussion of synchronized flow
20. Kühne, R. (2008). Foundation of traffic flow theory I: Greenshields legacy highway traffic. Symposium on the Fundamental Diagram: 75 Years (Greenshields 75 Symposium) Transportation Research Board, Woods Hole.
21. A study of highway capacity
22. Yperman, I., Logghe, S., and Immers, B. (2005, January 13–16). The link transmission model: An efficient implementation of the kinematic wave theory in traffic networks. Proceedings of the 10th EWGT Meeting and 16th Mini-Euro Conference, Poznan, Poland.
23. Three-phase traffic theory and highway capacity10.1016/j.physa.2003.10.017 ↗
24. A new approach for modeling of Fundamental Diagrams10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00043-X ↗
25. Gaffney, J., and Zurlinden, H. (2021). City Wide Coordinated Ramp Meters - Keeping Urban Motorways Safe and Efficient With City Wide Coordinated Ramp Meters. Int. Encycl. Transp., 10–20.10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10290-8 ↗
26. Overview of road traffic control strategies
27. Gartner, N., Messer, C.J., and Rathi, A.K. (2002). Traffic Flow Theory-A State-of-the-Art Report: Revised Monograph, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
28. A hybrid prediction approach for road tunnel traffic based on spatial-temporary data fusion10.1007/s10489-018-1339-3 ↗
29. Lana, I., Olabarrieta, I.I., Del Ser, J., and Rodriguez, L. (2020, January 20–23). Data-driven predictive modeling of traffic and air flow for the improved efficiency of tunnel ventilation systems. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294565 ↗
30. Traffic flow prediction with big data: A deep learning approach
31. Traffic flow forecasting for road tunnel using PSO-GPR algorithm with combined kernel function10.1155/2017/2090783 ↗
32. Comparative evaluation of fuzzy inference system, support vector machine and multilayer feed-forward neural network in making discretionary lane changing decisions10.14311/NNW.2018.28.021 ↗
33. Koukol, M., and Přibyl, O. (2013). Fuzzy algorithm for highway speed Harmonisation in VISSIM. Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41647-7_56 ↗
34. (2021, August 15). Fed4sae (Federated Cps Digital Innovation Hubs for the Smart Anything Everywhere Initiative) Website. Available online: https://fed4sae.eu/innovative-projects/smart-tunnel/.
35. (2021, August 15). Smartcitystreets Website. Available online: https://smartcitystreets.com/tunnels/.
36. (2021, August 15). Schreder Website. Available online: https://www.schreder.com/en/projects/smart-tunnel-lighting-solution-ensures-safety-comfort-velser-tunnel.
37. (2021, August 15). Smart Tunnel Project Website. Available online: https://wtc2023.gr/smart-tunnel-project/.
38. Deep Shanghai project–A strategy of infrastructure integration for megacities10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.008 ↗
39. From urban underground space (UUS) to sustainable underground urbanism (SUU): Shifting the focus in urban underground scholarship10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105650 ↗
40. Socio-environmental costs of underground space use for urban sustainability10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757 ↗
41. Shahrour, I., Bian, H., Xie, X., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Use of smart technology to improve management of utility tunnels. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020711 ↗
42. Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway10.1016/j.trb.2013.03.007 ↗
43. Diakaki, P., and Kotsialos, D.W. (2003). Review of Road Traffic Control Strategies, IEEE.10.1109/JPROC.2003.819606 ↗
44. Mobile highway telematics system on D1 highway in the Czech Republic
45. Lom, M., Přibyl, O., and Svítek, M. (2016). Industry 4.0 as a Part of Smart Cities. 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), IEEE.10.1109/SCSP.2016.7501015 ↗
46. Mustapha, K., Mcheick, H., and Mellouli, S. (2016). Smart cities and resilience plans: A multi-agent based simulation for extreme event rescuing. Public Administration and Information Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_8 ↗
47. Knowledge-Based Approach to Selection of Weight-in-Motion Equipment
48. Hara, M., Nagao, T., Hannoe, S., and Nakamura, J. (2016). New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8030206 ↗