journal article·2021-11-08Open access

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Lumbar Spine by Using a New Interspinous Process Device: A Finite Element Analysis

Hung-Wen Wei, Shao-Ming Chuang, Chen-Sheng Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 21

Abstract

Minimally invasive decompression is generally employed for treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it results in weakened spinal stability. To augment spinal stability, a new interspinous process device (NIPD) was developed in this study. The biomechanical features of the NIPD were evaluated in this study. Three finite-element (FE) models of the entire lumbar spine were implemented to perform biomechanical analysis: the intact, defect (DEF), and NIPD models. The DEF model was considered for lumbar spines with bilateral laminotomies and partial discectomy at L3–L4. Range of motion (ROM), disc stress, and facet joint contact force were evaluated in flexion, extension, torsion, and lateral bending in the three FE models. The results indicated that ROM in the extension increased by 23% in the DEF model but decreased by 23% in the NIPD model. In the NIPD model, the cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension was within 5%, and negligible changes were noted in the facet joint contact force for torsion and lateral bending. Thus, the NIPD offers superior spinal stability and causes only a minor change in cephalic adjacent disc stress in flexion and extension during the bilateral laminotomy and partial discectomy of the lumbar spine. However, the NIPD has a minor influence on the ROM and facet joint force for lateral bending and torsion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: Comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191438b ↗
2. Spinal stenosis, a cause of cauda equina compression10.1302/0301-620X.50B3.606 ↗
3. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Radiographic changes and clinical correlations10.3171/jns.1994.81.5.0707 ↗
4. Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical correlations10.3171/jns.1994.81.5.0699 ↗
5. Biomechanical analysis of the disc adjacent to posterolateral fusion with laminectomy in lumbar spine10.1097/01.bsd.0000123426.12852.e7 ↗
6. Lo, H.J., Chen, H.M., Kuo, Y.J., and Yang, S.W. (2020). Effect of different designs of interspinous process devices on the instrumented and adjacent levels after double-level lumbar decompression surgery: A finite element analysis. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0244571 ↗
7. Biomechanical analysis of different lumbar interspinous process devices: A finite element study10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.051 ↗
8. Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex)10.1007/s00264-013-2006-2 ↗
9. An evaluation of the host response to an interspinous process device based on a series of spine explants: Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM)10.21037/jss.2019.10.13 ↗
10. Three-dimensional volumetric changes and clinical outcomes after decompression with DIAM implantation in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases
11. Lo, H.J., Chen, C.S., Chen, H.M., and Yang, S.W. (2019). Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: A finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 20.10.1186/s12891-019-2565-5 ↗
12. Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology10.1007/s11517-017-1767-y ↗
13. Finite element analysis and design of an interspinous device using topology optimization10.1007/s11517-018-1838-8 ↗
14. Bae, I.S., Bak, K.H., Chun, H.J., Ryu, J.I., Park, S.J., and Lee, S.J. (2020). Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0243771 ↗
15. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar fusion with proximal interspinous process device implantation10.1002/cnm.3498 ↗
16. The influence of different magnitudes and methods of applying preload on fusion and disc replacement constructs in the lumbar spine: A finite element analysis10.1080/10255842.2011.645226 ↗
17. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine10.1097/00007632-200112150-00014 ↗
18. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.08.006 ↗
19. Tai, C.L., Hsieh, P.H., Chen, W.P., Chen, L.H., Chen, W.J., and Lai, P.L. (2008). Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome—An experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 9.10.1186/1471-2474-9-84 ↗
20. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics10.1007/s00586-003-0540-0 ↗
21. Mechanical properties of lumbar spinal motion segments as affected by partial disc removal10.1097/00007632-198612000-00007 ↗
22. Shih, S.L., Liu, C.L., Huang, L.Y., Huang, C.H., and Chen, C.S. (2013). Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 14.10.1186/1471-2474-14-191 ↗
23. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures10.1097/00007632-200301010-00008 ↗
24. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine10.1097/00007632-199708150-00004 ↗