Development of a Commercial Screed Mortar with Low OPC Content by Incorporation of Biomass Fly Ash
Source abstract
Abstract
Substitute Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) by biomass fly ash (BFA) reduce the environmental impact produced by cement-based materials, and at the same time, decreased the economic and environmental burden associated with the landfilling of this waste. This study aims to evaluate the recycling of BFA as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in a commercial screed mortar formulation. Two BFA varieties, both resulting from fluidized bed combustion of forest residues, were used to replace 17, 50, and 67 wt.% of OPC. The influence of simple pre-treatment processes of the BFA, such as sieving and grinding, in the fresh and hardened state properties of the mortars, was evaluated. The BFAs were characterized in terms of chemical (XRF) and mineralogical (XRD) composition, particle size distribution (laser diffraction-COULTER) and morphology (SEM). The prepared formulations were characterized in terms of workability, mass loss upon curing, bulk density, sorptivity (by immersion and capillary), flexural and compressive strength and durability to 25 freeze–thaw cycles. Both of the BFAs are potential SCMs. Substitution of 17 wt.% OPC with BFA complied with the product technical requirements for compressive and flexural strength (10 and 3 MPa, respectively), with the ground and sieved and just sieved BFAs perform slightly better than the as-received BFA.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, CICECO—Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Department of Environment and Planning, CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Funding
Portugal 2020 · FCT/MCTES
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Cement industry: Sustainability, challenges and perspectives10.1007/s10311-010-0302-2 ↗
2. Challenges against CO2 abatement strategies in cement industry: A review10.1016/j.jes.2020.11.020 ↗
3. Valorization of wood chips ash as an eco-friendly mineral admixture in mortar mix design10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.004 ↗
4. Characterisation and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.109 ↗
5. Environmental sustainability in cement industry: An integrated approach for green and economical cement production
6. Technical and environmental performance of lower carbon footprint cement mortars containing biomass fly ash as a secondary cementitious material10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.004 ↗
7. International Energy Agency (2021, October 04). Technology Roadmap—Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry.
8. The fracture toughness the K IIIc of concretes with F fly ash (FA) additive10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.137 ↗
9. Plant biomass ashes in cement-based building materials. Feasibility as eco-efficient structural mortars and grouts10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.001 ↗
10. The relevance of ultrafine fly ash properties and mechanical properties in its fly ash-cement gelation blocks via static pressure forming10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.035 ↗
11. Reaction mechanisms of wood ash for use as a partial cement replacement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122889 ↗
12. Alkali-activated grouts based on slag-fly ash mixtures: From early-age characterization to long-term phase composition10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120510 ↗
13. Sustainable criterion selection framework for green building materials—An optimisation based study of fly-ash Geopolymer concrete
14. Sambucci, M., Sibai, A., and Valente, M. (2021). Recent Advances in Geopolymer Technology. A Potential Eco-Friendly Solution in the Construction Materials Industry: A Review. J. Compos. Sci., 5.10.3390/jcs5040109 ↗
15. Valente, M., Sambucci, M., and Sibai, A. (2021). Geopolymers vs. Cement Matrix Materials: How Nanofiller Can Help a Sustainability Approach for Smart Construction Applications—A Review. Nanomaterials, 11.10.3390/nano11082007 ↗
16. European Commission (2021, September 17). The Roadmap for Transforming the EU into a Competitive, Low-Carbon Economy by 2050. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2011-112-a-roadmap.
17. Field trials with concrete incorporating biomass-fly ash10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.084 ↗
18. Biomass fly ash as an alternative to coal fly ash in blended cements: Functional aspects10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121544 ↗
19. Ohenoja, K., Pesonen, J., Yliniemi, J., and Illikainen, M. (2020). Utilization of Fly Ashes from Fluidized Bed Combustion: A Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072988 ↗
20. Bottom ash from biomass combustion in BFB and its use in adhesive-mortars10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.015 ↗
21. Teixeira, E., Camões, A., Branco, F., and Matos, J. (2021). Effect of Biomass Fly Ash on Fresh and Hardened Properties of High Volume Fly Ash Mortars. Crystals, 11.10.3390/cryst11030233 ↗
22. Characteristics of distinct ash flows in a biomass thermal power plant with bubbling fluidised bed combustor10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.036 ↗
23. Biomass fly ash effect on fresh and hardened state properties of cement based materials10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.019 ↗
24. Mechanically Treated Fly Ash from Fluidized Bed Combustion of Peat, Wood, and Wastes in Concrete10.1007/s12649-019-00615-y ↗
25. ISO 1762:2019 (2019). Paper, Board, Pulps and Cellulose Nanomaterials—Determination of Residue (Ash Content) on Ignition at 525 °C, ISO.
26. EN 196-1:2005 (2005). Methods of Testing Cement—Part 1: Determination of Strength, CEN.
27. BS 8204-1:2003 (2003). Screeds, Bases and In Situ Floorings—Part 1: Concrete Bases and Cement Sand Levellings Screeds to Receive Floorings—Code of Practice, BSI.
28. EN 1015-3:1998 (1998). Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table), CEN.
29. EN 1015-18:2002 (2002). Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 18: Determination of Water Absorption Coefficient Due to Capillary Action of Hardened Mortar, CEN.
30. EN 998-2:2016 (2016). Specification for Mortar for Masonary—Part 2: Masonry Mortar, CEN.
31. Durability of mortars modified with the addition of amorphous aluminum silicate and silica fume10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102526 ↗
32. EN 450-1:2012 (2012). Fly Ash for Concrete—Part 1: Definition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria, CEN.
33. Mortar formulations with bottom ash from biomass combustion10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.093 ↗
34. Fly and bottom ashes from biomass combustion as cement replacing components in mortars production: Rheological behaviour of the pastes and materials compression strength10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.070 ↗
35. EN 197-1:2011 (2011). Cement Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements, CEN.
36. Fly ash from biomass combustion as replacement raw material and its influence on the mortars durability10.1007/s10163-017-0662-9 ↗
37. Milling of peat-wood fly ash: Effect on water demand of mortar and rheology of cement paste10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.014 ↗
38. Reuse of woody biomass fly ash in cement-based materials10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.052 ↗
39. Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Cement Screed with Various Supplementary Cementitious Materials10.1515/rams-2019-0006 ↗