Applications of FFTA–HFACS for Analyzing Human and Organization Factors in Electric Misoperation Accidents
Source abstract
Abstract
Human and organizational factors (HOFs) play an important role in electric misoperation accidents (EMAs), but research into the reliability of human factors is still in its infancy in the field of EMAs, and further investment in research is urgently required. To analyze the HOFs in EMAs, a hybrid method including the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) was applied to EMAs for the first time in the paper. HFACS is used to identify and classify the HOFs with 135 accidents, reorganized as basic events (BEs), intermediate events (IEs), and top event (TE), and develop the architecture of fault tree (FT). Fuzzy aggregation is employed to address experts’ expressions and obtain the failure probabilities of the BEs and the minimal cut sets (MCSs) of the FT. The approach generates BEs failure probabilities without reliance on quantitative historical failure statistics of EMAs via qualitative records processing. The FFTA–HFACS model is applied for quantitative analysis of the probability of failure of electrical mishaps and the interaction between accident risk factors. It can assist professionals in deciding whether and where to take preventive or corrective actions and assist in knowledgeable decision-making around the electric operation and maintenance process. Finally, applying this hybrid method to EMAs, the results show that the probability of an EMAs is 1.0410 × 10−2, which is a risk level that is likely to occur and must be controlled. Two of the most important risk factors are habitual violations and supervisory violation; a combination of risk factors of inadequate work preparation and paralysis, and irresponsibility on the part of employees are also frequent errors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis · Quality and Safety in Healthcare
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, March 25). National Energy Administration, Available online: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2021-03/25/c_139834495.htm.
2. Avella, P.C., Cabra, Á.M., Montoya, N.D., Barreto, A.B., Botero, L.S., and Vargas, J. (2007). Evento del 26 de Abril de 2007 en el sistEMAs Interconectado Nacional sin Colombiano, XM Companıa de Expertos en Mercados.
3. Analysis of major blackouts from 2003 to 2015: Classification of incidents and review of main causes10.1016/j.tej.2016.08.006 ↗
4. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate Pub Ltd.
5. Wiegmann, D.A., and Shappell, S.A. (2017). A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, Routledge.10.4324/9781315263878 ↗
6. Survey on quantification of human factor risk in electric misoperation
7. An extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System for use in open systems10.1080/14639220903536559 ↗
8. Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.028 ↗
9. Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.022 ↗
10. Hollaway, D.M.A., and Johnson, J.D. (2014, January 5–8). Human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS): Investigatory tool for human factors in offshore operational safety. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/25130-MS ↗
11. A hybrid model for human factor analysis in process accidents: FBN-HFACS10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.015 ↗
12. Investigations of Human and Organizational Factors in hazardous vapor accidents10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.040 ↗
13. Wang, Y.F., Roohi, S.F., Hu, X.M., and Xie, M. (2010, January 7–10). A new methodology to integrate human factors analysis and classification system with Bayesian Network. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Macao, China.10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674564 ↗
14. Power system: A reliability assessment using FTA10.1007/s13198-012-0100-2 ↗
15. Use of fuzzy set theory for level-I studies in probabilistic risk assessment10.1016/0165-0114(90)90038-8 ↗
16. A fuzzy set approach to fault tree and reliability analysis10.1016/0165-0114(90)90154-X ↗
17. Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly10.1016/j.microrel.2006.01.007 ↗
18. Safety assessment of natural gas storage tank using similarity aggregation method based fuzzy fault tree analysis (SAM-FFTA) approach10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104159 ↗
19. Applications of fuzzy faulty tree analysis and expert elicitation for evaluation of risks in LPG refuelling station10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.016 ↗
20. A methodology to evaluate human factors contributed to maritime accident by mapping fuzzy FT into ANN based on HFACS10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106892 ↗
21. A hybrid model for human-factor analysis of engine-room fires on ships: HFACS-PV&FFTA10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107992 ↗
22. Human accident hidden hazard identification and evaluation of power grid enterprise based on HFACS and grey correlation analysis method
23. Identification of correlation among performance shaping factors of SPAR-H method
24. Analysis of human factors in electric power production accidents based on improved HFACS
25. Fuzzy weighted method of human reliability assessment in substation operation
26. A quantitative method for human reliability in power system based on CREAM
27. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems10.1098/rstb.1990.0090 ↗
28. Shappell, S.A., and Wiegmann, D.A. (2000). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System—HFACS, EMBRY-RIDDLE Aeronautical University Press.
29. An impacting factors analysis of miners’ unsafe acts based on HFACS-CM and SEM10.1016/j.psep.2018.12.007 ↗
30. A systems approach to extraordinarily major coal mine accidents in China from 1997 to 2011: An application of the HFACS approach10.1080/10803548.2017.1415404 ↗
31. A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs)10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.017 ↗
32. Revising HFACS for SMEs in the chemical industry: HFACS-CSMEs10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104138 ↗
33. A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA)10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.009 ↗
34. Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.033 ↗
35. Maritime safety and the ISM code: A study of investigated casualties and incidents10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8 ↗
36. An investigation on unintended reactor trip events in terms of human error hazards of Korean nuclear power plants10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.009 ↗
37. Reliability analysis using fault tree analysis: A review
38. Risk analysis using fault-tree analysis (FTA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applicable to shield TBM tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.007 ↗
39. Marine accident analysis for collision and grounding in oil tanker using FTA method10.1080/03088839.2013.856524 ↗
40. Cost-based fire risk assessment in natural gas industry by means of fuzzy FTA and ETA10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104025 ↗
41. Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels10.1007/s11633-006-0107-8 ↗
42. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines
43. Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.024 ↗
44. Fuzzy fault-tree analysis using failure possibility10.1016/0026-2714(93)90326-T ↗
45. Zadeh, L.A. (1996). Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh, World Scientific.10.1142/9789814261302_0001 ↗
46. Fuzzy set theory10.1002/wics.82 ↗
47. Fault-tree analysis by fuzzy probability10.1109/TR.1983.5221727 ↗
48. A new method for fuzzy fault tree analysis10.1016/0026-2714(89)90568-4 ↗
49. An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry10.1016/j.psep.2014.05.001 ↗
50. Tavakoli, M., and Nafar, M. (2021). Modification of the FFTA method for calculating and analyzing the human reliability of maintenance groups in power transmission grids. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., 1–14.10.1007/s13198-021-01141-8 ↗
51. A novel weakest t-norm based fuzzy importance measure for fuzzy fault tree analysis of combustion engineering reactor protection system10.1142/S0218488519500429 ↗
52. Fuzzy fault tree analysis of oil and gas leakage in subsea production systems10.1016/j.joes.2017.11.005 ↗
53. Two-dimensional fuzzy fault tree analysis for chlorine release from a chlor-alkali industry using expert elicitation10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.116 ↗
54. Dynamic study of critical factors of explosion accident in laboratory based on FTA10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104877 ↗
55. Chen, Y. (2020). The development and validation of a human factors analysis and classification system for the construction industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 1–15.10.1080/10803548.2020.1787623 ↗
56. Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis10.1016/j.jlp.2004.12.003 ↗
57. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., and Haasl, D.F. (1981). Fault Tree Handbook.
58. Shafiee, M., Enjema, E., and Kolios, A. (2019). An integrated FTA-FMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems: A case study of subsea blowout preventers. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061192 ↗
59. Rausand, M., and Hoyland, A. (2003). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons.
60. An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009 ↗
61. A novel fuzzy bayesian network-HFACS (FBN-HFACS) model for analyzing human and organization factors (HOFs) in process accidents10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.012 ↗
62. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information10.1037/h0043158 ↗
63. Fuzzy hierarchical weight analysis model for multicriteria decision problem
64. Utilisation of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008 ↗
65. New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements10.1016/0165-0114(95)00365-7 ↗
66. An application of fuzzy concepts to modelling of reliability analysis10.1016/0165-0114(90)90026-3 ↗
67. Foshan People’s Government (2019, February 10). Available online: http://www.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfgb/rmzfbgswj/content/post_1743618.html.
68. Luo, Z. (2013). A brief discussion on the problems of “two tickets” in the use of electric power production safety work. Chin. Foreign Entrep., 163–164.
69. Trial description of habitual violation and preventive measures
70. Investigations on container ship berthing from the pilot’s perspective: Accident analysis, ethnographic study, and online survey
71. Incorporation of human factors into maritime accident analysis using a data-driven Bayesian network10.1016/j.ress.2020.107070 ↗
72. Fuzzy fault tree analysis: A review of concept and application10.1007/s13198-013-0145-x ↗