Privacy Preservation and Analytical Utility of E-Learning Data Mashups in the Web of Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Virtual learning environments contain valuable data about students that can be correlated and analyzed to optimize learning. Modern learning environments based on data mashups that collect and integrate data from multiple sources are relevant for learning analytics systems because they provide insights into students’ learning. However, data sets involved in mashups may contain personal information of sensitive nature that raises legitimate privacy concerns. Average privacy preservation methods are based on preemptive approaches that limit the published data in a mashup based on access control and authentication schemes. Such limitations may reduce the analytical utility of the data exposed to gain students’ learning insights. In order to reconcile utility and privacy preservation of published data, this research proposes a new data mashup protocol capable of merging and k-anonymizing data sets in cloud-based learning environments without jeopardizing the analytical utility of the information. The implementation of the protocol is based on linked data so that data sets involved in the mashups are semantically described, thereby enabling their combination with relevant educational data sources. The k-anonymized data sets returned by the protocol still retain essential information for supporting general data exploration and statistical analysis tasks. The analytical and empirical evaluation shows that the proposed protocol prevents individuals’ sensitive information from re-identifying.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Cloud Data Security Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ingeniería en Automática, Electrónica, Arquitectura y Redes de Computadores, Universidad de Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
Departamento de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
Funding
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship10.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
2. IEEE Big Data Governance and Metadata Management, Industry Connections Activity (2021, September 09). Big Data Governance and Metadata Management: Standards Roadmap. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/governance/iccom/bdgmm-standards-roadmap-2020.pdf.
3. Chang, W., Mishra, S., and NIST, N.P. (2015). NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 5, Architectures White Paper Survey.
4. Chang, W., Boyd, D., and Levin, O. (2019). NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 6, Reference Architecture.
5. Chang, W., Reinsch, R., Boyd, D., and Buffington, C. (2019). NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 7, Standards Roadmap.
6. Open Data Center Alliance (2021, September 09). Big Data Consumer Guide, Available online: https://bigdatawg.nist.gov/_uploadfiles/M0069_v1_7760548891.pdf.
7. Explore the Next Generation of Cloud-Based E-Learning Environment
8. Magoulas, G. (2011). Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. E-Infrastructures and Technologies for Lifelong Learning: Next Generation Environments, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61520-983-5 ↗
9. Magoulas, G. (2011). Diplek: An Open LMS that Supports Fast Composition of Educational Services. E-Infrastructures and Technologies for Lifelong Learning: Next Generation Environments, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-61520-983-5 ↗
10. Wurzinger, G., Chang, V., and Guetl, C. (2009, January 1–3). Towards greater flexibility in the learning ecosystem—Promises and obstacles of service composition for learning environments. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/DEST.2009.5276765 ↗
11. Conde, M.A., and Hernández-García, A. (2019). Data Driven Education in Personal Learning Environments—What about Learning beyond the Institution?. Int. J. Learn. Anal. Artif. Intell. Educ., 1.10.3991/ijai.v1i1.11041 ↗
12. Architecting Analytics Across Multiple E-Learning Systems to Enhance Learning Design10.1109/TLT.2021.3072159 ↗
13. Is Privacy a Show-stopper for Learning Analytics? A Review of Current Issues and their Solutions
14. U.S. Department of Education (2021, September 09). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 34 CFR §99 (FERPA), Available online: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html.
15. Hundepool, A., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Franconi, L., Giessing, S., Nordholt, E.S., Spicer, K., and de Wolf, P.P. (2012). Statistical Disclosure Control, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118348239 ↗
16. Chang, W., Roy, A., and Underwood, M. (2019). NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 4, Security and Privacy.
17. Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing: A Survey of Recent Developments10.1145/1749603.1749605 ↗
18. Privacy-Preserving Learning Analytics: Challenges and Techniques10.1109/TLT.2016.2607747 ↗
19. Ordinal, Continuous and Heterogeneous k-Anonymity Through Microaggregation10.1007/s10618-005-0007-5 ↗
20. Protecting Respondents’ Identities in Microdata Release10.1109/69.971193 ↗
21. De-Identification in Learning Analytics
22. U.S. Office for Civil Rights (2021, September 09). Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, Available online: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html.
23. van Tilborg, H.C.A., and Jajodia, S. (2011). Unlinkability. Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5 ↗
24. Khosrow-Pour, M. (2009). Managing IS Security and Privacy. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, IGI Global. [2nd ed.].10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4 ↗
25. Cavoukian, A. (2021, September 09). Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles. Available online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/pbd_implement_7found_principles.pdf.
26. Wilkinson, M.D., Verborgh, R., da Silva Santos, L.O.B., Clark, T., Swertz, M.A., Kelpin, F.D., Gray, A.J., Schultes, E.A., van Mulligen, E.M., and Ciccarese, P. (2017). Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of Web technologies. Peerj Comput. Sci., 3.10.7717/peerj-cs.110 ↗
27. Singhal, A. (2021, September 09). Introducing the Knowledge Graph: Things, Not Strings. Official Blog of Google, Available online: http://goo.gl/zivFV.
28. The biggest lie on the Internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486870 ↗
29. Cesconetto, J., Augusto Silva, L., Bortoluzzi, F., Navarro-Cáceres, M., Zeferino, C.A., and Leithardt, V.R.Q. (2020). PRIPRO-Privacy Profiles: User Profiling Management for Smart Environments. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9091519 ↗
30. FogAuthChain: A secure location-based authentication scheme in fog computing environments using Blockchain10.1016/j.comcom.2020.08.021 ↗
31. Patwary, A.A.N., Naha, R.K., Garg, S., Battula, S.K., Patwary, M.A.K., Aghasian, E., Amin, M.B., Mahanti, A., and Gong, M. (2021). Towards Secure Fog Computing: A Survey on Trust Management, Privacy, Authentication, Threats and Access Control. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10101171 ↗
32. Co-utile Collaborative Anonymization of Microdata
33. An anonymization protocol for continuous and dynamic privacy-preserving data collection10.1016/j.future.2017.09.009 ↗
34. Cooperative Privacy-Preserving Data Collection Protocol Based on Delocalized-Record Chains10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028063 ↗
35. Privacy preserving distributed machine learning with federated learning10.1016/j.comcom.2021.02.014 ↗
36. Privacy preserving distributed association rule mining approach on vertically partitioned healthcare data10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.023 ↗
37. Mohammed, N., Fung, B.C.M., Wang, K., and Hung, P.C.K. (2009, January 23–25). Privacy-Preserving Data Mashup. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology (EDBT ’09), St. Petersburg, Russia.10.1145/1516360.1516388 ↗
38. Flumian, M. (2018). The Management of Integrated Service Delivery: Lessons from Canada, Inter-American Development Bank. Number 6.
39. The Future Is Big Graphs: A Community View on Graph Processing Systems10.1145/3434642 ↗
40. Ali, W., Yao, B., Saleem, M., Hogan, A., and Ngomo, A.C.N. (2021). Survey of RDF Stores & SPARQL Engines for Querying Knowledge Graphs. TechRXiv.10.36227/techrxiv.14376884.v1 ↗
41. SW-Store: A vertically partitioned DBMS for Semantic Web data management10.1007/s00778-008-0125-y ↗
42. Chapter 5: Querying RDF Data: A Multigraph-based Approach10.1002/9781119528227.ch5 ↗
43. Speicher, S., Arwe, J., and Malhotra, A. (2021, September 09). Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C Recommendation. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/.
44. Vaidya, J., and Clifton, C. (2002, January 23–26). Privacy Preserving Association Rule Mining in Vertically Partitioned Data. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’02), Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1145/775107.775142 ↗
45. Secure set intersection cardinality with application to association rule mining
46. Vaidya, J., and Clifton, C. (2004, January 22–24). Privacy Preserving Naive Bayes Classifier for Vertically Partitioned Data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.10.1137/1.9781611972740.59 ↗
47. Privacy-Preserving Decision Trees over Vertically Partitioned Data10.1145/1409620.1409624 ↗
48. Wright, R., and Yang, Z. (2004, January 22–25). Privacy-Preserving Bayesian Network Structure Computation on Distributed Heterogeneous Data. Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/1014052.1014145 ↗
49. Vaidya, J., and Clifton, C. (2003, January 24–27). Privacy-Preserving k-Means Clustering over Vertically Partitioned Data. Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/956755.956776 ↗
50. Jagannathan, G., and Wright, R.N. (2005, January 21–24). Privacy-Preserving Distributed k-Means Clustering over Arbitrarily Partitioned Data. Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/1081870.1081942 ↗
51. Sheikhalishahi, M., and Martinelli, F. (2017). Privacy preserving clustering over horizontal and vertical partitioned data. IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/ISCC.2017.8024694 ↗
52. Service-Oriented Architecture for High-Dimensional Private Data Mashup10.1109/TSC.2011.13 ↗
53. Meyerson, A., and Williams, R. (2004, January 14–16). On the Complexity of Optimal K-Anonymity. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS ’04), Paris, France.10.1145/1055558.1055591 ↗
54. Fung, B., Wang, K., and Yu, P. (2005, January 5–8). Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, Washington, DC, USA.
55. Ubiquitous learning: A systematic review10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.009 ↗
56. Multi-source and multimodal data fusion for predicting academic performance in blended learning university courses10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106908 ↗
57. Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models10.1016/j.chb.2019.106189 ↗
58. Multiple instance learning for classifying students in learning management systems10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.044 ↗
59. Internet of Things to Smart IoT Through Semantic, Cognitive, and Perceptual Computing10.1109/MIS.2016.34 ↗
60. Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics10.1111/bjet.12152 ↗
61. Privacy-driven Design of Learning Analytics Applications—Exploring the Design Space of Solutions for Data Sharing and Interoperability
62. Open University Learning Analytics dataset10.1038/sdata.2017.171 ↗
63. Incremental Maintenance of RDF Views of Relational Data
64. A Survey and Taxonomy of Leader Election Algorithms in Distributed Systems10.17485/ijst/2014/v7i6.14 ↗
65. Mansour, E., Sambra, A.V., Hawke, S., Zereba, M., Capadisli, S., Ghanem, A., Aboulnaga, A., and Berners-Lee, T. (2016, January 11–15). A Demonstration of the Solid Platform for Social Web Applications. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, Montréal, QC, Canada.10.1145/2872518.2890529 ↗
66. A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: Towards context-aware ubiquitous learning10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x ↗
67. Maldonado, Y., Trujillo, L., Schütze, O., Riccardi, A., and Vasile, M. (2018). Distributing Computing in the Internet of Things: Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing Overview. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer.
68. (a,k)-Anonymous Scheme for Privacy-Preserving Data Collection in IoT-based Healthcare Services Systems10.1007/s10916-018-0896-7 ↗
69. Semantic Web of Things: An Analysis of the Application Semantics for the IoT Moving towards the IoT Convergence10.1504/IJWGS.2014.060260 ↗
70. IoT Communication Security Issues for Companies: Challenges, Protocols and The Web of Data10.2478/picbe-2020-0104 ↗
71. A systematic review of security and privacy issues in the internet of medical things; The role of machine learning approaches10.7717/peerj-cs.414 ↗
72. Security and Privacy Issues in Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.018 ↗