The 3D Printing of Freestanding PLLA Thin Layers and Improving First Layer Consistency through the Introduction of Sacrificial PVA
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is an inexpensive way of producing objects through a programmed layer-by-layer deposition. For multi-layer, macro-scaled prints, acceptable printing is achieved provided, amongst other factors, first layer adhesion is sufficient to fix a part to the surface during printing. However, in the deposition of structures with a single or few layers, first layer consistency is significantly more important and is an issue that has been previously overlooked. As layer-to-bed adhesion is prioritised in first layer printing, thin layer structures are difficult to remove without damage. The deposition of controllable thin structures has potential in tissue engineering through the use of bioactive filaments and incorporation of microfeatures into complex, patient-specific scaffolds. This paper presents techniques to progress the deposition of thin, reproducible structures. The linear thickness variation of 3D-printed single PVA and PLLA layers is presented as a function of extrusion factor and the programmed vertical distance moved by the nozzle between layers (the layer separation). A sacrificial PVA layer is shown to significantly improve first layer consistency, reducing the onus on fine printer calibration in the deposition of single layers. In this way, the linear variation in printed single PLLA layers with bed deviation is drastically reduced. Further, this technique is used to demonstrate the printing of freestanding thin layers of ~25 µm in thickness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Fast Assessment and Treatment in Healthcare (FAST healthcare)
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
2. 3D Printing for the Rapid Prototyping of Structural Electronics10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810 ↗
3. From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023 ↗
4. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter10.1108/01445150310501190 ↗
5. Pattinson, S.W., Huber, M.E., Kim, S., Lee, J., Grunsfeld, S., Roberts, R., Dreifus, G., Meier, C., Liu, L., and Hogan, N. (2019). Additive Manufacturing of Biomechanically Tailored Meshes for Compliant Wearable and Implantable Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater., 29.10.1002/adfm.201901815 ↗
6. Controlled Sequential Shape Changing Components by 3D Printing of Shape Memory Polymer Multimaterials10.1016/j.piutam.2014.12.021 ↗
7. Flexible, transparent, sub-100 µm microfluidic channels with fused deposition modeling 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane10.1088/1361-6439/ab2f26 ↗
8. Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices10.1007/s00216-017-0398-3 ↗
9. Simplified fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices using fused deposition modeling 3D printing10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.110 ↗
10. 3D printed microfluidics for biological applications10.1039/C5LC00685F ↗
11. Fused filament fabrication of scaffolds for tissue engineering; how realistic is shape-memory? A review10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123440 ↗
12. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
13. 3D printed biodegradable composites: An insight into mechanical properties of PLA/chitosan scaffold10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106722 ↗
14. Microarchitected 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposite scaffolds for biomedical applications10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103576 ↗
15. Domínguez-Robles, J., Martin, N.K., Fong, M.L., Stewart, S.A., Irwin, N.J., Rial-Hermida, M.I., Donnelly, R.F., and Larrañeta, E. (2019). Antioxidant PLA Composites Containing Lignin for 3D Printing Applications: A Potential Material for Healthcare Applications. Pharmaceutics, 11.10.3390/pharmaceutics11040165 ↗
16. Fabrication of poly(lactic acid)/Ti composite scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties and biocompatibility via fused filament fabrication (FFF)–based 3D printing
17. Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramics optimized 3D printed poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.057 ↗
18. In vitro comparison of 3D printed polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite and polylactic acid/bioglass composite scaffolds: Insights into materials for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103641 ↗
19. Three dimensional printed macroporous polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for promoting bone formation in a critical-size rat calvarial defect model10.1080/14686996.2016.1145532 ↗
20. 3D printed mesh reinforcements enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun scaffolds10.1186/s40824-019-0171-0 ↗
21. A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 ↗
22. A Guiding Framework for Microextrusion Additive Manufacturing10.1115/1.4042607 ↗
23. Design and Implementation of Arduino Based 3D Printing Using FDM Technique10.15623/ijret.2016.0516038 ↗
24. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
25. Improving the impact strength of Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) in fused layer modeling (FLM)10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.011 ↗
26. Experimental validation of a numerical model for the strand shape in material extrusion additive manufacturing
27. Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030 ↗
28. An approach for mechanical property optimization of fused deposition modeling with polylactic acid via design of experiments10.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0083 ↗
29. Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material10.1007/s40964-015-0002-3 ↗
30. Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259 ↗
31. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
32. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 ↗
33. Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
34. Optimization of mechanical properties of printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene using RSM design10.1007/s00170-018-2710-6 ↗
35. Priedeman, W.R., and Brosch, A.L. (2004). Soluble Material and Process for Three-Dimensional Modeling. (6,790,403), U.S. Patent.
36. Flow analysis of the polymer spreading during extrusion additive manufacturing