journal article·2021-06-25Open access

Position-Specific Attentional Skills in Team Sports: A Comparison between Defensive and Offensive Football Players

Stefanie Klatt, Josef Nerb

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 13

Abstract

Over the last few decades, technical as well as cognitive skills and their relation to position-specific skill requirements have been extensively investigated as indicators for players’ performance in team sports. To explore the impact of positioning in football on inattentional blindness we employed dynamic tasks that presented an unexpected object and analyzed its noticing rates in three different experiments. In Experiment 1, amateur and expert football players performed a well-established inattentional blindness task of counting the number of times a basketball was passed between two groups while an unexpected, non-sport specific object was introduced to the situation. Noticing rates were higher for strikers compared to players of other playing positions. The findings support a position-specific advantage regarding inattentional blindness for more offensive players compared to more defensive players. Using the same inattentional blindness task, this finding was investigated in Experiment 2 in more detail, i.e., by differentiating between more playing positions. Results revealed that offensive players (in particular strikers) observed unexpected objects more frequently than defensive players. Experiment 3 used a newly developed football-specific task requiring participants to find solutions in different game situations with an unexpected free-standing player appearing in one of these situations. Defensive players again showed more inattentional blindness than offensive players (in particular offensive mid-fielders), i.e., offensive players perceived the unmarked player more often. This indicates that players not only differ in the conscious perception of unexpected objects that are irrelevant to the sport as a function of their playing position, but also show differences when the perception of the unexpected relevant object is useful for finding tactical solutions in a given game situation. Our findings provide further insight into the importance of the definition of position-specific skill requirements in team sports.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports Performance and Training · Motor Control and Adaptation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany

School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne BN20 7SR, UK

Institute of Psychology, University of Education, 79117 Freiburg, Germany

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Mack, A., and Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3707.001.0001 ↗
2. What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.217 ↗
3. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events10.1068/p281059 ↗
4. The dark side of visual awareness in sport: Inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task10.3758/APP.72.5.1327 ↗
5. The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness10.1016/j.concog.2006.01.001 ↗
6. Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and Communication, Pergamon Press.10.1037/10037-000 ↗
7. Fundamental components of attention10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256 ↗
8. The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002 ↗
9. “I spy with my little eye!”—Breadth of attention, inattentional blindness, and tactical decision making in team sports10.1123/jsep.29.3.365 ↗
10. Moneyball and soccer—An analysis of the key performance indicators of elite male soccer players by position10.4100/jhse.2012.72.06 ↗
11. Talent identification and development in soccer10.1080/02640410050120041 ↗
12. Using an imagery intervention to train visual exploratory activity in elite academy football players10.1080/10413200.2017.1395929 ↗
13. Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., Simons, D.J., and Bock, O. (2013). Fixation strategy influences the ability to focus attention on two spatially separate objects. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0065673 ↗
14. The size and shape of the attentional “spotlight” varies with differences in sports expertise10.1037/xap0000012 ↗
15. Inattentional blindness to unexpected events in 8-15-year-olds10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.09.002 ↗
16. Pay attention! A review of attentional expertise in sport10.1080/17509840802641372 ↗
17. Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents10.1080/13506280600959316 ↗
18. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving10.1037/1076-898X.9.1.23 ↗
19. The attention window: A narrative review of limitations and opportunities influencing the focus of attention10.1080/02701367.2017.1293228 ↗
20. Effects of lab- and field-based attentional training on athletes’ attention-window10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.05.009 ↗
21. Distance is relative: Inattentional blindness critically depends on the breadth of the attentional focus10.1016/j.concog.2020.102878 ↗
22. Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention10.1068/p271025 ↗
23. Attention, perception, and action in a simulated decision-making task10.1123/jsep.2018-0177 ↗
24. Color perception and attentional load in dynamic, time-constrained environments10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02614 ↗
25. Immersive screens change attention width but not perception or decision-making performance in natural and basic tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102961 ↗
26. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task10.3758/s13414-019-01935-w ↗
27. Moderate movement, more vision: Effects of physical exercise on inattentional blindness10.1068/p7294 ↗
28. Attentional and perceptual capabilities are affected by high physical load in a simulated soccer decision-making task