journal article·2021-06-24Open access

LAMDA Controller Applied to the Trajectory Tracking of an Aerial Manipulator

Gabriela M. Andaluz, Luis Morales, Paulo Leica, Víctor H. Andaluz, Guillermo Palacios-Navarro

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 13

Abstract

In this work, a novel LAMDA (Learning Algorithm for Multivariable Data Analysis) control strategy for trajectory tracking for an aerial manipulator is presented. Four control strategies are developed: Kinematic, Inverse Dynamics, Sliding Mode (SMC), and LAMDA. These are compared with each other in order to verify their performance to fulfill the control objective. Experimental tests were also carried out to validate the developed controllers. In addition, a study of stability has been also performed for all the controllers. The results obtained by the LAMDA controller demonstrated the good performance of the controller in the aerial manipulator robot. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a LAMDA controller has been applied to an aerial robotic manipulator.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems · Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems · Advanced Control Systems Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escuela de Ingeniería Mecatrónica, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador

Department of Electronic Engineering and Communications, University of Zaragoza, 44003 Teruel, Spain

Departamento de Automatización y Control, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, Ecuador

Departamento de Eléctrica y Electrónica, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. A Truly-Redundant Aerial Manipulator System with Application to Push-and-Slide Inspection in Industrial Plants10.1109/LRA.2019.2895880 ↗
2. Hamaza, S., Georgilas, I., and Richardson, T. (2019, January 4–8). 2D Contour Following with an Unmanned Aerial Manipulator: Towards Tactile-Based Aerial Navigation. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968591 ↗
3. Compliant Aerial Manipulators: Toward a New Generation of Aerial Robotic Workers10.1109/LRA.2016.2519948 ↗
4. Lee, S., Kim, H., Kim, U., and Lee, H. (2020, January 13). Concave Wall Surface Tracking for Aerial Manipulator Using Contact Force Estimation Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2020 20th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Busan, Korea.10.23919/ICCAS50221.2020.9268298 ↗
5. Yang, Y., Liu, J., Li, Z., Yang, X., Yu, X., and Gao, H. (2020, January 18). Nonlinear Disturbance Observer Based Adaptive Backstepping Control for Trajectory Tracking of Aerial Parallel Manipulator. Proceedings of the IECON 2020 the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore.10.1109/IECON43393.2020.9254853 ↗
6. Guayasamin, A., Leica, P., Herrera, M., and Camacho, O. (2018, January 14–16). Trajectory Tracking Control for Aerial Manipulator Based on Lyapunov and Sliding Mode Control. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS), Quito, Ecuador.10.1109/INCISCOS.2018.00013 ↗
7. Imanberdiyev, N., and Kayacan, E. (2020, January 18). Redundancy Resolution Based Trajectory Generation for Dual-Arm Aerial Manipulators via Online Model Predictive Control. Proceedings of the IECON 2020 the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore.10.1109/IECON43393.2020.9254702 ↗
8. Tlatelpa-Osorio, Y.E., Rodriguez-Cortes, H., and Acosta, J.A. (2020, January 1–4). A Descentralized Approach for the Aerial Manipulator Trajectory Tracking. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICUAS48674.2020.9213857 ↗
9. Wang, X., Zhou, Z., Chen, S., and Wang, R. (2019, January 27–30). Trajectory Tracking and Vibration Suppression of Spacecraft Combination Connected by a Space Manipulator. Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Guangzhou, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2019.8865224 ↗
10. Camacho, O., Leica, P., Antamba, J., and Quinonez, J. (2019, January 20–22). Null-Space Based Control Applied to a Formation of Aerial Manipulators in Congested Environment. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS), Quito, Ecuador.10.1109/INCISCOS49368.2019.00046 ↗
11. Leader/Follower Force Control of Aerial Manipulators10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053654 ↗
12. Morton, K., McFadyen, A., and Gonzalez, F. (2018, January 12–15). Generalized Trajectory Control for Tree-Structured Aerial Manipulators. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICUAS.2018.8453446 ↗
13. Jia, P., Li, E., Liang, Z., and Qiang, Y. (2012, January 6–8). Adaptive Neural Network Control of an Aerial Work Platform’s Arm. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Beijing, China.10.1109/WCICA.2012.6359065 ↗
14. Coordinated Control of Aerial Robotic Manipulators: Theory and Experiments10.1109/TCST.2017.2716905 ↗
15. Liu, Y.-C., and Huang, C.-Y. (2021). DDPG-Based Adaptive Robust Tracking Control for Aerial Manipulators With Decoupling Approach. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 1–14.
16. Naldi, R., Pounds, P., De Marco, S., and Marconi, L. (2015, January 1–3). Output Tracking for Quadrotor-Based Aerial Manipulators. Proceedings of the 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ACC.2015.7171003 ↗
17. Fault Location in Power Distribution Systems Using a Learning Algorithm for Multivariable Data Analysis10.1109/TPWRD.2006.883021 ↗
18. On LAMDA Clustering Method Based on Typicality Degree and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.022 ↗
19. van der Tak, F., Lique, F., Faure, A., Black, J., and van Dishoeck, E. (2020). The Leiden Atomic and Molecular Database (LAMDA): Current Status, Recent Updates, and Future Plans. Atoms, 8.10.3390/atoms8020015 ↗
20. Two Cluster Validity Indices for the LAMDA Clustering Method10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106102 ↗
21. Fault Diagnosis by LAMDA methodology Applied to Drinking Water Plant10.1109/TLA.2014.6893990 ↗
22. Advanced Fuzzy-Logic-Based Context-Driven Control for HVAC Management Systems in Buildings10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966545 ↗
23. Modeling and Control of Nonlinear Systems Using an Adaptive LAMDA Approach10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106571 ↗
24. Morales, L., Aguilar, J., Camacho, O., and Rosales, A. (2021). An Intelligent Sliding Mode Controller Based on LAMDA for a Class of SISO Uncertain Systems. Inf. Sci.10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.012 ↗
25. A New Criterion to Validate and Improve the Classification Process of LAMDA Algorithm Applied to Diesel Engines10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.005 ↗
26. LAMDA-HAD, an Extension to the LAMDA Classifier in the Context of Supervised Learning10.1142/S0219622019500457 ↗
27. Intelligent Tracking Control for Robot Manipulator Including Actuator Dynamics via TSK-Type Fuzzy Neural Network10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.832531 ↗
28. Li, D., and Zhenqi, G. (2019, January 3–5). Trajectory Tracking Control of an Aerial Robot Based on Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control Approach. Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Nanchang, China.10.1109/CCDC.2019.8832420 ↗
29. Weather Spark (2021, March 25). Average Wheather on February 20th in Ambato. Available online: https://es.weatherspark.com/d/20027/2/20/Tiempo-promedio-el-20-de-febrero-en-Ambato-Ecuador#Sections-Wind.