Buckling Strength of 3-D Printed Thermoplastic Thin Shells: Notes on an Exploratory Study of As-Printed and Reinforced Cases
Source abstract
Abstract
Additively-manufactured (AM) materials have a defined mesostructure and natural voids which impact their structural stability; thin shells, which do not have the bulk to support or absorb the effects of the variances in properties, are particularly affected. Thin shells are a common feature in many designs, providing good strength-to-weight ratios for many applications, particularly in the aerospace and structural design domains. The use of AM to fabricate thin structures could both expand the use of AM and improve the application space for thin structures in design, but this problem has not yet been widely discussed for buckling cases. This short technical note explored this problem for thermoplastic thin shells fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM), providing insight into the problem, some initial experimental results, and discussion of design implications. A designed 2(4−1) factorial experiment was used to study the buckling behavior, examining the impact of wall thickness, material, and two methods for internal reinforcement (soft infill and polyurethane foam). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) (including model adequacy testing and proof of Fisher Assumption validity) was completed on data from two replications (32 total tests), providing useful information on the significance of the factors and their interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Rua XV de Novembro, 1299-Centro, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, OKT N143, 301 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Transportation Building 117, 104 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Stein, E., Borst, R.D., and Hughes, T. (2004). Models and Finite Elements for Thin-Walled Structures. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, Wiley. Chapter 3.10.1002/0470091355 ↗
2. Vinson, J.R. (1988). The Behavior of Thin Walled Structures: Beams, Plates, and Shells, Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-009-2774-2 ↗
3. Yang, N., and Bai, F. (2017). Damage Analysis and Evaluation of Light Steel Structures Exposed to Wind Hazards. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7030239 ↗
4. Ye, J., Jiang, L., and Wang, X. (2017). Seismic Failure Mechanism of Reinforced Cold-Formed Steel Shear Wall System Based on Structural Vulnerability Analysis. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7020182 ↗
5. On the static aeroelastic tailoring of composite aircraft swept wings modelled as thin-walled beam structures10.1016/0961-9526(92)90039-9 ↗
6. Structural Response of Polyethylene Foam-Based Sandwich Panels Subjected to Edgewise Compression10.3390/ma6104545 ↗
7. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6 ↗
8. Multi-objective optimization of fiber reinforced composite laminates for strength, stiffness and minimal mass10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.06.001 ↗
9. A method for solving the buckling problem of a thin-walled shell10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.06.004 ↗
10. Wang, C., Wang, C., and Reddy, J. (2004). Exact Solutions for Buckling of Structural Members, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203483534 ↗
11. Elso, M.I. (2012). Finite Element Method Studies on the Stability Behavior Of Cylindrical Shells Under Axial and Radial Uniform and Non-Uniform Loads. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Pública de Navarra].
12. Rocha Pereira, T., Patterson, A.E., Lee, Y.H., and Messimer, S.L. (2019). Critical Buckling Load of Thin-Walled Plastic Cylinders in Axial and Radial Loading: Overview and FEA Case Study. EngrXiv.10.31224/osf.io/2mtfu ↗
13. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
14. Functionally graded Inconel 718 processed by additive manufacturing: Crystallographic texture, anisotropy of microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075 ↗
15. Influence of meso-structure and chemical composition on FDM 3D-printed parts10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.019 ↗
16. Messimer, S.L., Rocha Pereira, T., Patterson, A.E., Lubna, M., and Drozda, F.O. (2019). Full-Density Fused Deposition Modeling Dimensional Error as a Function of Raster Angle and Build Orientation: Large Dataset for Eleven Materials. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 3.10.3390/jmmp3010006 ↗
17. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
18. Skawiński, I., and Goetzendorf-Grabowski, T. (2019). FDM 3D printing method utility assessment in small RC aircraft design. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol.10.1108/AEAT-07-2018-0189 ↗
19. 3D Technology in Production of Sealed Containers for Chemical Industry Devices10.24867/IJIEM-2016-3-114 ↗
20. Chen, R., Ramachandran, A., Liu, C., Chang, F.K., and Senesky, D. (2017, January 9–13). Tsai-Wu Analysis of a Thin-Walled 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Structural Bracket. Proceedings of the 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Grapevine, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2017-0567 ↗
21. Cost-effective printing of 3D objects with skin-frame structures10.1145/2508363.2508413 ↗
22. Build-to-last
23. Mao, M., He, J., Li, X., Zhang, B., Lei, Q., Liu, Y., and Li, D. (2017). The Emerging Frontiers and Applications of High-Resolution 3D Printing. Micromachines, 8.10.3390/mi8040113 ↗
24. Mechanical and morphological characterization of spherical cell porous structures manufactured using FDM process10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106527 ↗
25. Brischetto, S., Ferro, C.G., Maggiore, P., and Torre, R. (2017). Compression Tests of ABS Specimens for UAV Components Produced via the FDM Technique. Technologies, 5.10.3390/technologies5020020 ↗
26. Effect of defects on elastic-plastic behavior of cellular materials10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.050 ↗
27. Influence of yield surface curvature on the macroscopic yielding and ductile failure of isotropic porous plastic materials10.1016/j.jmps.2017.07.009 ↗
28. Material failure mechanisms and damage models10.1109/24.106769 ↗
29. Prediction of welding buckling distortion in a thin wall aluminum T joint10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.03.016 ↗
30. Buckling of axially compressed thin cylindrical shells with functionally graded middle layer10.1016/j.tws.2006.10.006 ↗
31. Elastic buckling of uniformly compressed thin-walled regular polygonal tubes10.1016/j.tws.2013.04.016 ↗
32. Stress Reduction of 3D Printed Compliance-Tailored Multilayers10.1002/adem.201700883 ↗
33. Development of the Improving Process for the 3D Printed Structure10.1038/srep39852 ↗
34. Dow (2017). Great Stuff Pro Gaps and Cracks Foam Sealant, Dow Chemical Company. Available online: http://masterlinebg.com/en/files/2012/07/Great-Stuff_Pro_Gaps-Cracks_TDS_ENG.pdf.
35. Montgomery, D.C. (2012). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley. [8th ed.].
36. What’s normal anyway? Residual plots are more telling than significance tests when checking ANOVA assumptions10.1111/jac.12220 ↗
37. An Empirical Comparison of the Anova F-Test, Normal Scores Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test Under Violation of Assumptions10.1177/001316447403400406 ↗