Determination traction-separation parameters and its sensitivity analysis of bilinear cohesive zone model through experimental and numerical peeling analysis of electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The optimization of traction-separation parameters within the cohesive zone model (CZM) is crucial for accurately simulating electrode peeling failure in lithium-ion batteries. This study performed 180° peeling tests on NCM electrodes and used Abaqus software alongside the sim-flow optimization tool for simulation analysis, aiming to accurately replicate the failure behavior at the lithium-ion battery electrode interface. Experimental results were used to determine the fracture energy of the electrode interface, while numerical simulations analyzed the peeling performance of the electrode. By fitting the force-displacement curves from both simulation and experiment, the traction-separation parameters within the bilinear CZM were optimized. Additionally, the study analyzed the effects of traction-separation parameters, as well as the modulus and thickness of the current collector, on peeling behavior. The results showed that a significant increase in the interface stiffness and strength increased the steady-state peeling force. Among these, the fracture energy had the most significant influence on the steady-state peeling force. Furthermore, while the modulus and thickness of the current collector affected the maximum peeling force, their effect on the steady-state peeling force was negligible. These findings enhance the accuracy of simulating the failure behavior of the electrode interface.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanomaterials: science and applications in the lithium-sulfur battery10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.011 ↗
2. A review of modeling, management, and applications of grid-connected Li-ion battery storage systems10.1109/TSG.2022.3188598 ↗
3. Promises and challenges of next-generation “beyond Li-ion” batteries for electric vehicles and grid decarbonization10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00767 ↗
4. On the challenge of developing advanced technologies for electrochemical energy storage and conversion10.1016/j.mattod.2014.02.014 ↗
5. Theoretical and experimental study on the interfacial adhesive properties of graphite electrodes in different charging and aging states10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.114 ↗
6. Analytical model and experimental verification of the interfacial peeling strength of electrodes10.1007/s11340-020-00651-z ↗
7. Lithiation-induced interfacial failure of electrode-collector: a first-principles study10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.10.018 ↗
8. Enhancement effects of Co doping on interfacial properties of Sn electrode-collector: a first-principles study10.1021/acsami.9b01418 ↗
9. Changes of adhesion properties for negative electrode and positive electrode under wet conditions and different states of charge10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102870 ↗
10. Peel tests for quantifying adhesion and toughness: a review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101086 ↗
11. A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints10.1080/00218464.2021.1941903 ↗
12. Testing mechanical performance of adhesively bonded composite joints in engineering applications: an overview10.1080/00218464.2021.1953479 ↗
13. Measuring the coating adhesion strength of electrodes for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.03.002 ↗
14. Kirigami-inspired adhesion with high directional asymmetry10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105053 ↗
15. Effectiveness analysis of the study on the bonding performance of car soft decoration coated interior trim based on cohesive zone model10.1080/00218464.2022.2147832 ↗
16. Interfacial competitive debonding of a bilayer elastic film on a rigid substrate10.1115/1.4052151 ↗
17. Measurement of binder/active material interface fracture in rechargeable batteries and the effect of oxide coating10.1115/1.4064209 ↗
18. Measurement and analysis of adhesion property of lithium-ion battery electrodes with SAICAS10.1021/am404580f ↗
19. Interfacial adhesion energy of lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.eml.2016.08.002 ↗
20. Influence of formulation method and related processes on structural, electrical and electrochemical properties of LMS/NCA-blend electrodes10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2014.04.009 ↗
21. Impact modelling of single-lap bonded joints by cohesive zone models10.1016/j.promfg.2019.07.026 ↗
22. Simulation of ductile adhesive failure with experimentally determined cohesive law10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.018 ↗
23. Identification of traction-separation parameters by means of peel testing and in situ confocal microscopy10.1088/1361-6439/aafa2f ↗
24. A general solution to the maximum detachment force in thin film peeling10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111546 ↗
25. Study on the effect of cohesive parameters on the bonding strength of the interface between the skin and 3D-mesh cloth of the automobile dash panel10.1080/00218464.2021.1997746 ↗
26. Numerical analysis of the peel test for characterisation of interfacial debonding in laminated glass10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.07.010 ↗
27. Determination of cohesive laws by the J integral approach10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00127-9 ↗
28. Determination of cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode II loading
29. Determining mode I cohesive law of Pinus pinaster by coupling double cantilever beam test with digital image correlation
30. Assessment of cohesive traction-separation relationships in ABAQUS: a comparative study10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.09.004 ↗
31. Deep-green inversion to extract traction-separation relations at material interfaces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111698 ↗
32. Data driven modeling of interfacial traction-separation relations using a thermodynamically consistent neural network10.1016/j.cma.2022.115826 ↗
33. Inverse identification of cohesive zone parameters for sintered nano-silver joints based on dynamic convolution neural network10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109651 ↗
34. Delamination in cross-ply laminates: identification of traction-separation relations and cohesive zone modeling10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.025 ↗
35. Mode I cohesive zone model parameters identification and comparison of measurement techniques based on uncertainty estimation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.12.014 ↗
36. Mode I cohesive zone model parameters identification and comparison of measurement techniques for robustness to the law shape evaluation10.1080/00218464.2019.1669450 ↗
37. Temperature-dependent mechanical behaviour of PMMA: experimental analysis and modelling10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.016 ↗
38. On characterization of cohesive zone model (CZM) based upon digital image correlation (DIC) method10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106921 ↗
39. An inverse analysis of cohesive zone model parameter values for ductile crack growth simulations10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.12.006 ↗
40. Effect of environmental conditioning on pure mode I fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102826 ↗
41. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
42. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
43. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
44. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
45. Quantitative prediction of the whole peeling process of an elastic film on a rigid substrate10.1115/1.4040336 ↗
46. Ststmes · 2016
47. Thin-film peeling-the elastic term10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005 ↗
48. 2010
49. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
50. Application of the partial Dirichlet–Neumann contact algorithm to simulate low-velocity impact events on composite structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107424 ↗
51. A 3D transversally isotropic constitutive model for advanced composites implemented in a high performance computing code10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.03.021 ↗
52. Cohesive zone length of orthotropic materials undergoing delamination10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.033 ↗
53. Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, and applications10.1115/1.1595677 ↗
54. Mixed mode failure curve for an interface crack between single crystal silicon and silicone rubber10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103640 ↗
55. Application of the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) using tetrahedral finite elements to calculate the stress intensity factor10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107853 ↗
56. On cohesive element parameters and delamination modelling10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.009 ↗
57. Adhesion strength of the cathode in lithium-ion batteries under combined tension/shear loadings10.1039/C7RA12382E ↗
58. A review of current collectors for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229321 ↗