Reasons for Removal of Miniplates Used in Fixation of Maxillofacial Bone Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Maxillofacial fractures are a prevalent occurrence, and the widespread use of miniplates to stabilize and secure these fractures during surgery is common. However, the post-surgical fate of these miniplates remains a subject of contention among surgeons. Some advocate for their removal, while others suggest leaving them in place. This study aims to perform an extensive meta-analysis of pertinent studies to ascertain the destiny of miniplates employed in maxillofacial surgery and discuss the consequences of either their extraction or retention. To execute this meta-analysis, a search was conducted across number of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Embase, and Scopus. Keywords such as “titanium miniplates”, “screws”, “maxillofacial surgery”, “complications”, and “removal” were utilized to identify pertinent studies. The search was constrained to studies published between 1989 and 2022. The analysis encompassed only studies reporting outcomes related to miniplates in maxillofacial surgery, including complication rates and removal frequencies. Eleven studies conformed to the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 2240 patients, ten of which were retrospectives and one prospective, with the largest study involving 434 patients. The overall complication rate was determined to be 13.3%. The most prevalent reasons for miniplate removal included patient preference, tooth extraction, and infections. The average time span for miniplate removal was 10.7 months, with the most prolonged reported duration being 24 years. These findings imply that immediate removal might not be imperative in the majority of instances. In conclusion, our meta-analysis underscores the necessity of removing miniplates in cases where hardware leads to a variety of complications and physical discomfort. Principal factors driving plate removal included patient requests, tooth extractions, and infections. Ordinarily, plate removal took place within the span of 6 to 12 months, with the mandible being the most frequent site for removal. These findings accentuate the significance of extended monitoring to assess the trajectory of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery and provide valuable insights for future clinical decisions. To validate these conclusions and gain deeper insights into the factors influencing plate removal in maxillofacial surgery, further research with larger participant cohorts and standardized outcome reporting is imperative.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Bone fractures and treatments · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
Center of Medical and Bio Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Haerle, F., Champy, M., and Terry, B.C. (2009). Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Osteosynthesis, Thieme.10.1055/b-002-72255 ↗
2. Osteosynthesis using miniaturized screws on plates in facial and cranial surgery. Indications and results in 400 cases
3. Resolving controversies related to plate and screw fixation in the growing craniofacial skeleton10.1097/00001665-199511000-00023 ↗
4. Gareb, B., Van Bakelen, N.B., Buijs, G.J., Jansma, J., De Visscher, J.G.A.M., Hoppenreijs, T.J.M., Bergsma, J.E., Van Minnen, B., Stegenga, B., and Bos, R.R.M. (2017). Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0177152 ↗
5. Routine removal of the plate after surgical treatment for mandibular angle fracture with a third molar in relation to the fracture line10.4103/2231-0746.161077 ↗
6. Bone changes after experimental osteotomies fixed with absorbable self-reinforced poly-l-lactide screws or metallic screws studied by plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/0142-9612(95)91052-Z ↗
7. Long-term tissue response to bioabsorbable poly-l-lactide and metallic screws: An experimental study10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.009 ↗
8. The behaviour of titanium as a biomaterial: Microscopy study of plates and surrounding tissues in facial osteosynthesis10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80025-0 ↗
9. Late foreign-body reaction to PLLA screws used for fixation of acetabular osteotomy10.1007/s10195-007-0089-5 ↗
10. Delayed Foreign Body Reaction Caused by Bioabsorbable Plates Used for Maxillofacial Fractures10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.40 ↗
11. Rational for Maxillofacial Fracture Plate Removal
12. The fate of miniplates in facial trauma and orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study10.1016/0266-4356(89)90043-0 ↗
13. Complications and removal rates of miniplates and screws used for maxillofacial fractures10.1097/00000637-200203000-00006 ↗
14. Jr Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: A review of 76 cases10.1097/01.sap.0000183802.38116.37 ↗
15. Reasons for miniplate removal following maxillofacial trauma: A 4-year study10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.001 ↗
16. The Removal of Plates after Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: A Retrospective Study
17. The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: A 10 year retrospective study10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.016 ↗
18. Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: To remove or remain? A retrospective study10.1007/s00068-013-0348-5 ↗
19. Reasons for plate removal after treatment of orbitozygomatic complex fractures10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.003 ↗
20. Policy towards Removal of Mini Plates in Maxillofacial Trauma—A Follow up Study of 234 Patients
21. Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery Patients with Titanium Osteosynthesis Miniplates: Remove or Not?10.1097/SCS.0000000000006352 ↗
22. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
23. Periodontal disease as a primary cause of surgical site infection in fractures of the mandible: Is smoking a confounding variable?10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.08.001 ↗
24. Intraoral Wound Dehiscence After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
25. Infection after removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: A retrospective study
26. Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery—A retrospective study10.1054/ijom.2002.0344 ↗
27. Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: A follow-up study10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.005 ↗
28. Jr Managing the pediatric facial fracture10.1055/s-0029-1202592 ↗
29. Mini-plate removal in maxillofacial trauma patients during a five-year retrospective study10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.182 ↗
30. Complications after miniplate fixation of facial bone fractures
31. Armencea, G., Gheban, D., Onisor, F., Mitre, I., Manea, A., Trombitas, V., Lazar, M., Baciut, G., Baciut, M., and Bran, S. (2019). Histological Change in Soft Tissue Surrounding Titanium Plates after Jaw Surgery. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12193205 ↗
32. Tribological behavior of Ti-6Al-4V against cortical bone in different bio lubricants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.031 ↗
33. Experimental longterm study of titanium ions eluted from pure titanium miniplates10.1002/jbm.820290716 ↗
34. Exposure to Ti4Al4V Titanium Alloy Leads to Redox Abnormalities, Oxidative Stress, and Oxidative Damage in Patients Treated for Mandible Fractures10.1155/2018/3714725 ↗
35. Hypersensitivity to titanium osteosynthesis with impaired fracture healing, eczema, and T-cell hyperresponsiveness in vitro: Case report and review of the literature10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00931.x ↗
36. Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: A clinical report10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60233-4 ↗
37. In vivo surface analysis of titanium and stainless steel miniplates and screws10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80085-3 ↗
38. Retrieval study of stainless steel and titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery10.1007/BF00122394 ↗
39. The use of titanium and stainless steel in fracture fixation10.1586/erd.10.53 ↗
40. Comparison of Titanium bone plates and screws vs. stainless steel bone plates and screws in the management of mandibular fractures—A long term clinical study
41. Evaluation of metacarpal bone plates in the mandibular fracture10.1016/0007-117X(83)90045-8 ↗
42. Miniplate removal in operated cases of maxillofacial region in a dental institute in Rajasthan, India
43. Dynamic study about metal release from titanium miniplates in maxillofacial surgery10.1054/ijom.2000.0039 ↗
44. Policy of consultant oral and maxillofacial surgeons towards removal of miniplate components after jaw fracture fixation: Pilot study10.1054/bjom.1997.0084 ↗
45. Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage10.1055/s-0035-1570074 ↗
46. Stress shielding effect of rigid internal fixation plates on mandibular bone grafts. A photon absorption densitometry and quantitative computerized tomographic evaluation10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80101-8 ↗
47. Rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures. An analysis of 270 fractures treated using the AO/ASIF method10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80533-8 ↗
48. Metal release from plates used in jaw fracture treatment. A Pilot Study10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80102-X ↗
49. Should titanium miniplates be removed after bone healing is complete?10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80249-8 ↗
50. Biodegradable versus titanium osteosynthesis in maxillofacial traumatology: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis10.1016/j.ijom.2019.11.009 ↗
51. Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.001 ↗