A generalized- Park-Paulinho-Roesler cohesive zone model to simulate moderate ductile adhesive joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Among all the mechanical joints available in the industry, adhesively bonded joints are highly regarded due to their unique advantages. Therefore, it is of great importance to present an accurate numerical simulation of adhesive joints to predict their mechanical. In this regard, the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) is the most suitable material model for simulating the adhesive layer in adhesively bonded joints. However, the existing CZM has some limitations to predict the behavior of ductile adhesives, especially under mixed-mode loading. In this paper, a new potential-based CZM based on the Park-Paulinho-Roesler (PPR) model named G-PPR (Generalized - PPR) has been developed to eliminate these limitations. Here, various forms of Traction-Separation Law (TSL) for Araldite® 2015 as a moderate ductile adhesive are directly extracted using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and End Notched Flexure (ENF) tests at different adhesive thicknesses. To validate the new model, the numerically derived force-displacement responses of the ENF and Single Lap Joint (SLJ) simulation by G-PPR model were compared with the PPR and Bi-linear numerical responses and experimental results. The G-PPR responses show a more accurate prediction compared to other models for force-displacement curves and different shapes of TSL, especially in a thicker layer of moderate ductile adhesive.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Single lap joints bonded with structural adhesives reinforced with a mixture of silica nanoparticles and multi walled carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.007 ↗
2. A review on bi-adhesive joints: benefits and challenges10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103098 ↗
3. Strain rate dependence of a crash resistant adhesive as a function of temperature for the automotive industry
4. Mechanical characterization of a modern epoxy adhesive for automotive industry10.1007/s40430-019-1844-2 ↗
5. Lemaitre · 2005
6. Fracture and damage mechanics modelling of thin-walled structures - an overview10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.10.005 ↗
7. A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.006 ↗
8. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
9. 2008
10. Fatigue damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints under variable amplitude loading using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.008 ↗
11. Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: a review10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102451 ↗
12. A review on the Cohesive Zone Models for crack propagation analysis
13. da Silva · 2011
14. Pirondi · 2011
15. Cohesive zone models : a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces10.1115/1.4023110 ↗
16. Mode I fracture R-curve and cohesive law of CFRP composite adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103102 ↗
17. Analysis of automotive mixed-adhesive joints weakened by moist conditions: experimental characterization and numerical simulation using cohesive zone model10.1111/ffe.12962 ↗
18. Finite‐deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three‐dimensional crack‐propagation analysis10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
19. Fibre debonding and breakage in a whisker-reinforced metal10.1016/0921-5093(95)80005-0 ↗
20. On the effect of adhesive thickness on mode I fracture energy - an experimental and modelling study using a trapezoidal cohesive zone model10.1080/00218464.2019.1601087 ↗
21. Simulation of cup - cone fracture using the cohesive model10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00133-4 ↗
22. A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
23. Assessment of cohesive traction-separation relationships in ABAQUS: a comparative study10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.09.004 ↗
24. Fundamental physical principles and cohesive zone models at finite displacements - limitations and possibilities10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.020 ↗
25. SCIENCE AND on the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
26. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials damage and failure of non-conventional composite laminates view project10.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
27. Mixed-mode decohesion elements for analyses of progressive delamination
28. Simulation of delamination in fiber composites with a discrete cohesive failure model10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00245-1 ↗
29. An interface debonding law subject to viscous regularization for avoiding instability: application to the delamination problems10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.014 ↗
30. Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
31. Continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding
32. A new cohesive zone model for mixed mode interface fracture in bimaterials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.04.013 ↗
33. Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.675 ↗
34. An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface10.1016/0022-5096(90)90001-K ↗
35. Dislocation nucleation versus cleavage decohesion at crack tips
36. Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix10.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
37. Mode II fracture toughness of a brittle and a ductile adhesive as a function of the adhesive thickness10.1080/00218464.2010.506155 ↗
38. Implementation and verification of the Park-Paulino-Roesler cohesive zone model in 3D10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.010 ↗
39. A novel traction-separation law for the prediction of the mixed mode response of ductile adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.001 ↗
40. A novel mixed-mode cohesive formulation for crack growth analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.015 ↗
41. Determination of cohesive laws by the J integral approach10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00127-9 ↗
42. Constitutive behaviour of mixed mode loaded adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.06.014 ↗
43. Advanced techniques for estimation of the tensile fracture toughness of adhesive joints
44. Direct extraction of rate-dependent traction-separation laws for polyurea/steel interfaces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.019 ↗
45. Numerical evaluation of dissimilar cohesive models to predict the behavior of Double-Cantilever Beam specimens10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.007 ↗
46. Characterizing cohesive zone model using a mixed-mode direct method10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.10.045 ↗
47. Delamination R-curve phenomena due to damage10.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-B ↗
48. Shear behaviour of adhesive layers10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.036 ↗
49. Some aspects of cohesive models and modelling with special application to strength of adhesive layers10.1007/s10704-010-9458-9 ↗
50. Determination of cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode II loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.007 ↗
51. Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.001 ↗
52. Experimental investigation on environmental degradation of automotive mixed-adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.008 ↗
53. A growing library of three-dimensional cohesive elements for use in ABAQUS10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.004 ↗