journal article·2022-09

A machine learning material model for structural adhesives in finite element analysis

Daniel Sommer, André Haufe, Peter Middendorf

Publisher page

Abstract

The computational analysis of adhesives within finite element simulations is important for many engineering applications, from automotive structures to civil engineering. The underlying material descriptions are closed, analytically formulated models representing the stress-response of the material for given strains. In this publication, we investigate and present a methodology for adopting artificial neural networks for this purpose. The aim is to show feasibility and performance of such models to be able to uncouple the material description from fixed formulations to reap the benefits of neural networks for materials modelling. A methodology is presented for creating training data for a structural adhesive, whereby the data is obtained from specimen and from generic strain paths of a baseline material model. From this, feed-forward neural networks are trained and evaluated using machine learning tools as well as from an engineering perspective by pre-defined test strain paths. It is shown that, given the quality and the quantity of training data is adequate, the model is able to generalize with respect to the response. Especially, the coverage of complete strain space is shown to be crucial. A framework for using machine learning models in a commercial finite element code is presented, integrating models trained through high-level programming interfaces. This enables validating the performance and accuracy of such models in explicit simulations, which is shown to be a crucial step in evaluation of machine learning material models. The model is confirmed to be able to represent structural adhesives with high precision comparable to an analytical model and to generalize for unknown geometries and loading conditions. An approach to predict element failure with the machine learning model is shown and finally, the neural network model response is made explainable from an engineering point of view using feature importance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Lucas · 2012 · 1
2. A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints
3. Knowledge–based modeling of material behavior with neural networks
4. Implicit constitutive modelling for viscoplasticity using neural networks10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980930)43:2<195::AID-NME418>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
5. One for all: universal material model based on minimal state-space neural networks10.1126/sciadv.abf3658 ↗
6. Electromechanical admittance based integrated health monitoring of adhesive bonded beams using surface bonded piezoelectric transducers10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.05.002 ↗
7. Investigation and neural network prediction of wood bonding quality based on pressing conditions10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.02.010 ↗
8. Experimental investigation and prediction of bonding strength of oriental beech (fagus orientalis lipsky) bonded with polyvinyl acetate adhesive10.1080/01694243.2015.1072989 ↗
9. Zgoul. Use of artificial neural networks for modelling rate dependent behaviour of adhesive materials
10. Numerical characterisation of uncured elastomers by a neural network based approach10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.12.012 ↗
11. Experimental analysis and prediction of strength of adhesive-bonded single-lap composite joints: taguchi and artificial neural network approaches
12. Characterize traction–separation relation and interfacial imperfections by data-driven machine learning models10.1038/s41598-021-93852-y ↗
13. Thermodynamic consistent neural networks for learning material interfacial mechanics
14. The use of neural networks in the analysis of dual adhesive single lap joints subjected to uniaxial tensile test10.3390/ma14020419 ↗
15. Failure load prediction of single lap adhesive joints using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.aej.2016.04.029 ↗
16. Direction-sensitive stress measurements with carbon nanotube sensors10.1002/pat.246 ↗
17. Géron · 2019
18. Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning
19. Gieske · 1995
20. 2020
21. Predictive modeling of damage and failure in adhesively bonded metallic joints using cohesive interface elements
22. Failure of single hat-shaped thin-walled tubular composite t-joints under impact loading10.1016/j.tws.2020.106815 ↗
23. A fortran-keras deep learning bridge for scientific computing
24. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions