journal article·2022-12-22Open access

Occupational Footwear Design Influences Biomechanics and Physiology of Human Postural Control and Fall Risk

Hunter Derby, Harish Chander, Sachini N. K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige, Alana J. Turner, Adam C. Knight, Reuben Burch, Charles Freeman, Chip Wade, John C. Garner

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

While design modifications present on work boots improve safety, they may not always provide optimal human performance during work tasks. Understanding the impact of these different design features on biomechanical and physiological postural control and locomotion variables can aid in better design modifications that can provide a safe and efficient human performance. This brief review focuses on a series of studies conducted by the current research team, that have tested three different work boots (SB: high-top steel-toed work boots; TB: high-top tactical work boots; SR: low-top slip-resistant work boots). The series of studies included testing of these work boots or combinations of them under acute and chronic simulated occupational workloads, assessing biomechanical variable such as postural stability, gait, slips, and muscle activity, as well as physiological variables such as heart rate, energy expenditure, oxygen consumption, and pain perception. The impact of each of the work boots and their design feature on postural control and locomotion are summarized from these studies’ previously published literature. Finally, work boot design suggestions for optimal human performance are provided for better work boot selection, modification, and design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Performance · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

Human Factors & Athlete Engineering, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA

Department of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Weber State University, Ogden, UT 84408, USA

Department of Kinesiology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29528, USA

Department of Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

Department of Human Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

Athletic Training Program, School of Applied Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA

Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Troy University, Troy, AL 36082, USA

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022, December 19). A look at Falls, Slips, and Trips in the Construction Industry, Available online: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2022/a-look-at-falls-slips-and-trips-in-the-construction-industry.htm.
2. Occupational falls: Interventions for fall detection, prevention and safety promotion10.1080/1463922X.2020.1836528 ↗
3. An Intergenerational Approach in the Promotion of Balance and Strength for Fall Prevention—A Mini-Review10.1159/000320250 ↗
4. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?10.1093/ageing/afl077 ↗
5. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9 ↗
6. Preventing falls in older adults: New interventions to promote more effective change-in-support balance reactions10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.06.005 ↗
7. The effects of Footwear on Standing Posture Control10.1589/jpts.10.47 ↗
8. Impact on balance while walking in occupational footwear10.1080/19424280.2013.834979 ↗
9. Falls and working individuals: Role of extrinsic and intrinsic factors10.1080/00140130110084791 ↗
10. The influence of boot stiffness on gait kinematics and kinetics during stance phase10.1080/00140130701582104 ↗
11. Effects of Pronated and Supinated Foot Postures on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability
12. Common ignorance, major problem: The role of footwear in plantar fasciitis10.1016/j.foot.2004.06.004 ↗
13. Evaluation of balance and fall risk in patients with plantar fasciitis syndrome
14. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: A biomechanical link to clinical practice
15. Chander, H., Kodithuwakku Arachchige, S.N.K., Turner, A.J., Burch V, R.F., Reneker, J.C., Knight, A.C., Wade, C., and Garner, J.C. (2021). Sensory Organization Test Conditions Influence Postural Strategy Rather than Footwear or Workload. IJERPH, 18.10.3390/ijerph181910511 ↗
16. Effect of lower-extremity muscle fatigue on postural control10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.031 ↗
17. The Impact of Footwear on Posture, Gait and Balance10.4236/health.2022.142016 ↗
18. Effect of work boot shaft stiffness and sole flexibility on lower limb muscle activity and ankle alignment at initial foot-ground contact when walking on simulated coal mining surfaces: Implications for reducing slip risk10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102903 ↗
19. Effect of shaft stiffness and sole flexibility on perceived comfort and the plantar pressures generated when walking on a simulated underground coal mining surface10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103024 ↗
20. Jebelli, H., Ahn, C.R., and Stentz, T.L. (2014). The Validation of Gait-Stability Metrics to Assess Construction Workers’ Fall Risk. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–25 June 2014, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784413616.124 ↗
21. Work boot design affects the way workers walk: A systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.003 ↗
22. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2022, December 19). Occupational Safety and Health Standards 2014, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910.
23. Orr, R., Maupin, D., Palmer, R., Canetti, E.F.D., Simas, V., and Schram, B. (2022). The Impact of Footwear on Occupational Task Performance and Musculoskeletal Injury Risk: A Scoping Review to Inform Tactical Footwear. IJERPH, 19.10.3390/ijerph191710703 ↗
24. The impact of different types of textile liners used in protective footwear on the subjective sensations of firefighters10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.013 ↗
25. Are underground coal miners satisfied with their work boots?10.1016/j.apergo.2017.08.009 ↗
26. The three-dimensional shapes of underground coal miners’ feet do not match the internal dimensions of their work boots10.1080/00140139.2017.1397201 ↗
27. Effects of heel height and high-heel experience on foot stability during quiet standing10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.004 ↗
28. Effects of Footwear Features on Balance and Stepping in Older People10.1159/000115850 ↗
29. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022, December 19). Fatal and Nonfatal Falls, Slips, and Trips in the Construction Industry, Available online: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2021/fatal-and-nonfatal-falls-slips-and-trips-in-the-construction-industry.htm.
30. The effect of textured surfaces on postural stability and lower limb muscle activity10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.012 ↗
31. Influence of footwear midsole material hardness on dynamic balance control during unexpected gait termination10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.01.005 ↗
32. Impact of occupational footwear and workload on postural stability in work safety10.3233/WOR-193043 ↗
33. Influence of military workload and footwear on static and dynamic balance performance10.1016/j.ergon.2017.11.003 ↗
34. Carrying asymmetric loads while walking on an uneven surface10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.173 ↗
35. Kodithuwakku Arachchige, S.N.K., Chander, H., Turner, A.J., and Knight, A.C. (2021). Impact of Prolonged Exposure to a Slippery Surface on Postural Stability. IJERPH, 18.10.3390/ijerph18052214 ↗
36. Impact of military type footwear and load carrying workload on postural stability10.1080/00140139.2018.1521528 ↗
37. The influence of occupational footwear on dynamic balance perturbations10.1080/19424280.2015.1031193 ↗
38. Chander, H., Garner, J., Wade, C., and Knight, A. (2017). Postural Control in Workplace Safety: Role of Occupational Footwear and Workload. Safety, 3.10.3390/safety3030018 ↗
39. Impact of occupational footwear and workload on lower extremity muscular exertion
40. Impact of occupational footwear during simulated workloads on energy expenditure10.1080/19424280.2018.1460623 ↗
41. The Interaction of Cognitive Interference, Standing Surface, and Fatigue on Lower Extremity Muscle Activity10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.002 ↗
42. Role of Occupational Footwear and Prolonged Walking on Lower Extremity Muscle Activation during Maximal Exertions and Postural Stability Tasks10.3390/biomechanics1020017 ↗
43. The energy cost and heart-rate response of trained and untrained subjects walking and running in shoes and boots10.1080/00140138408963563 ↗
44. The influence of firefighter boot type on balance10.1016/j.ergon.2012.11.002 ↗
45. Influence of military-type workload and footwear on muscle exertion during static standing10.1080/19424280.2017.1403968 ↗
46. Zhou, H., Chen, C., Xu, D., Ugbolue, U.C., Baker, J.S., and Gu, Y. (2021). Biomechanical Characteristics between Bionic Shoes and Normal Shoes during the Drop-Landing Phase: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18063223 ↗
47. A foot joint and muscle force assessment of the running stance phase whilst wearing normal shoes and bionic shoes
48. An Investigation of Differences in Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landing from Height Using Bionic Shoes and Normal Shoes10.3389/fbioe.2021.679123 ↗