Shear bond strenght of different repairing materials on 3D printed occlusal splints
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rise of new 3D printing technologies, occlusal splints are now widely produced using CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture). Although new and more resistant materials are being developed, daily use can still lead to small chips or cracks in CAD/CAM occlusal splints. Repairing the splint requires the use of different materials, but knowledge on their adhesion properties is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of 4 repair materials for 3D-printed occlusal devices: flowable resin, autopolymerizing acrylic resin, bis-acrylic resin, and 3D printer resin. A total of 30 disks were fabricated using 3D-printed occlusal device resin. After polishing and smoothing the surfaces, four different repair materials were applied within cylindrical tubes on each disk sample, without any surface pretreatment. Fifteen specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, while the other 15 specimens underwent thermocycling for 10 000 cycles. Shear bond testing was subsequently performed until specimen failure occurred. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA (for each material and thermocycling effect) and the Tukey multiple comparison test (α = .05). Among the tested resins for 3D-printed occlusal devices, autopolymerizing acrylic resin demonstrated the most significant increase in shear bond strength and a balanced fracture pattern after aging, making it suitable for repairs. In contrast, bis-acrylic resin`s initial high strength diminished after thermocycling (P < .05).
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing in dentistry-state of the art10.2341/18-229-L ↗
2. Occlusal splints from the beginning to the present10.1179/crn.2006.022 ↗
3. Wear behavior of occlusal splint materials manufactured by various methods: a systematic review10.1111/jopr.13432 ↗
4. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing10.1007/s00784-020-03329-x ↗
5. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.026 ↗
6. Materials and manufacturing techniques for occlusal splints: a literature review10.1111/joor.13550 ↗
7. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD- CAM versus conventional resins10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104813 ↗
8. In vitro time efficiency, fit, and wear of conventionally- versus digitally-fabricated occlusal splints10.3390/ma15031085 ↗
9. Effect of artificial aging on mechanical and physical properties of CAD-CAM PMMA resins for occlusal splints10.4047/jap.2023.15.5.227 ↗
10. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104254 ↗
11. Bonding interface and repairability of 3d-printed intraoral splints: shear bond strength to current polymers, with and without ageing10.3390/ma14143935 ↗
12. Resin adjustment of three-dimensional printed thermoset occlusal splints: bonding properties – short communication10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.011 ↗
13. G∗ Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences10.3758/BF03193146 ↗
14. Surface roughness and shear bond strength to composite resin of additively manufactured interim restorative material with different printing orientations10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.010 ↗
15. Microshear bond strength of resin cement to glass-ceramics after intaglio surface staining10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.017 ↗
16. A novel approach to improve repair bond strength of repaired acrylic resin: an in vitro study on the shear bond strength10.1111/jopr.12970 ↗
17. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.95 ↗
18. Shear bond strength of provisional repair materials bonded to 3D printed resin10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.003 ↗
19. Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): an update10.3390/polym12102299 ↗
20. The evaluation of water sorption/solubility on various acrylic resins
21. Comparative effect of different polymerization techniques on the flexural and surface properties of acrylic denture bases10.1111/jopr.12605 ↗