Uncertainty Analysis and Experimental Validation of Identifying the Governing Equation of an Oscillator Using Sparse Regression
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the rapid growth of computing technology has enabled identifying mathematical models for vibration systems using measurement data instead of domain knowledge. Within this category, the method Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems (SINDy) shows potential for interpretable identification. Therefore, in this work, a procedure of system identification based on the SINDy framework is developed and validated on a single-mass oscillator. To estimate the parameters in the SINDy model, two sparse regression methods are discussed. Compared with the Least Squares method with Sequential Threshold (LSST), which is the original estimation method from SINDy, the Least Squares method Post-LASSO (LSPL) shows better performance in numerical Monte Carlo Simulations (MCSs) of a single-mass oscillator in terms of sparseness, convergence, identified eigenfrequency, and coefficient of determination. Furthermore, the developed method SINDy-LSPL was successfully implemented with real measurement data of a single-mass oscillator with known theoretical parameters. The identified parameters using a sweep signal as excitation are more consistent and accurate than those identified using impulse excitation. In both cases, there exists a dependency of the identified parameter on the excitation amplitude that should be investigated in further research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Group System Reliability, Adaptive Structures, and Machine Acoustics SAM, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability and System Reliability LBF, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · the Open Access Publishing Fund of Technical University of Darmstadt
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Recovery of differential equations from impulse response time series data for model identification and feature extraction10.3390/vibration2010002 ↗
2. Model selection for hybrid dynamical systems via sparse regression10.1098/rspa.2018.0534 ↗
3. Constrained sparse Galerkin regression10.1017/jfm.2017.823 ↗
4. Unbehauen, H., and Bohn, C. (2016). Identifikation Dynamischer Systeme: Methoden zur Modellbildung Anhand von Messungen, Springer.
5. Oberst, S. (2018, January 7–9). Nonlinear Dynamics: Towards a paradigm change via evidence-based complex dynamics modelling. Proceedings of the 2018 Noise and Vibration Emerging Methods (NOVEM), Ibiza, Spain.
6. Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.04.008 ↗
7. Methods for data-driven multiscale model discovery for materials10.1088/2515-7639/ab291e ↗
8. Nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics: 10 more years of progress10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.07.020 ↗
9. Inferring Biological Networks by Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics10.1109/TMBMC.2016.2633265 ↗
10. Epileptic seizures are preceded by a decrease in synchronization10.1016/S0920-1211(03)00002-0 ↗
11. Rothman, P. (1999). Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Economic and Financial Data, Springer. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance.10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4 ↗
12. Angelov, P., Levine, D., and Apolloni, B. (2013, January 4–9). Computer-aided music composition with LSTM neural network and chaotic inspiration. Proceedings of the 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2013), Dallas, TX, USA.
13. Cross recurrence quantification for cover song identification10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/093017 ↗
14. Qin, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y.L., and Kang, J. (2018). Dynamic Model Updating for Bridge Structures Using the Kriging Model and PSO Algorithm Ensemble with Higher Vibration Modes. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18061879 ↗
15. An empirical study on decoupling PNLSS models illustrated on an airplane10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.438 ↗
16. Vortex-induced vibration of bridge decks: Volterra series-based model10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000628 ↗
17. A Wiener Model Identification for Creep and Vibration Linear and Hysteresis Nonlinear Dynamics of Piezoelectric Actuator10.1109/JSEN.2021.3125748 ↗
18. Saleem, A., Mesbah, M., and Al-Ratout, S. (2017, January 5–7). Nonlinear hammerstein model identification of amplified piezoelectric actuators (APAs): Experimental considerations. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/CoDIT.2017.8102665 ↗
19. An improved linear quadratic regulator control method through convolutional neural network–based vibration identification10.1177/1077546320933756 ↗
20. Vibration-based structural state identification by a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network10.1111/mice.12447 ↗
21. Elmegaard, M., Rübel, J., Inagaki, M., Kawamoto, A., and Starke, J. (September, January 30). Equation-Free Continuation of Maximal Vibration Amplitudes in a Nonlinear Rotor-Bearing Model of a Turbocharger. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, San Diego, CA, USA. Parts A, B and C.
22. SINDy-PI: A robust algorithm for parallel implicit sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics10.1098/rspa.2020.0279 ↗
23. Sparse representation for damage identification of structural systems10.1177/1475921720926970 ↗
24. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems10.1073/pnas.1517384113 ↗
25. SINDy-BVP: Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for boundary value problems10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023255 ↗
26. Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit10.1098/rspa.2018.0335 ↗
27. Fasel, U., Kaiser, E., Kutz, J.N., Brunton, B.W., and Brunton, S.L. (2021). SINDy with Control: A Tutorial. arXiv.10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683120 ↗
28. Data-driven identification of parametric partial differential equations10.1137/18M1191944 ↗
29. Learning partial differential equations via data discovery and sparse optimization10.1098/rspa.2016.0446 ↗
30. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
31. Compressive sensing10.1109/MSP.2007.4286571 ↗
32. Compressive sensing and low-rank libraries for classification of bifurcation regimes in nonlinear dynamical systems10.1137/130949282 ↗
33. Compressed sensing and dynamic mode decomposition
34. A Unified Framework for Sparse Relaxed Regularized Regression: SR310.1109/ACCESS.2018.2886528 ↗
35. Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models10.3150/11-BEJ410 ↗
36. Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system10.1038/s41467-017-00030-8 ↗
37. Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations10.1073/pnas.1906995116 ↗
38. Kovacic, I., and Brennan, M.J. (2011). The Duffing Equation: Nonlinear Oscillators and Their Phenomena, Wiley.10.1002/9780470977859 ↗
39. Harrell, J.F.E., and Harrell, F.E. (2015). Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 ↗
40. On the Convergence of the SINDy Algorithm10.1137/18M1189828 ↗
41. Meng, F. (2018). Modeling of Moving Sound Sources Based on Array Measurements. [Ph.D. Thesis, RWTH Aachen University].10.30819/4759 ↗
42. Ljung, L. (2019). System Identification Toolbox: User’s Guide, MathWorks, Inc.. Version: Matlab 2019a.
43. Fürnkranz, J., Gamberger, D., and Lavrač, N. (2012). Foundations of Rule Learning, Springer. Cognitive Technologies.10.1007/978-3-540-75197-7 ↗
44. The matlab ode suite10.1137/S1064827594276424 ↗
45. Nelles, O. (2001). Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models, Springer.
46. Bonamente, M. (2017). Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, Springer. [2nd ed.]. Graduate Texts in Physics.10.1007/978-1-4939-6572-4 ↗
47. Comparison of uncertainty in passive and active vibration isolation
48. Quantification and Evaluation of Parameter and Model Uncertainty for Passive and Active Vibration Isolation
49. Phillips, C.L., Parr, J.M., and Riskin, E.A. (2014). Signals, Systems, and Transforms, Pearson. [5th ed.].
50. Zur Genauigkeit von Schwingwegmessungen mit Hilfe von Beschleunigungs-und Geschwindigkeitssensoren
51. Numerische Integration von Beschleunigungssignalen