In Silico Studies of Tumor Targeted Peptide-Conjugated Natural Products for Targeting Over-Expressed Receptors in Breast Cancer Cells Using Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics and MMGBSA Calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, in silico studies were carried out for the design of diterpene and polyphenol-peptide conjugates to potentially target over-expressed breast tumor cell receptors. Four point mutations were induced into the known tumor-targeting peptide sequence YHWYGYTPQN at positions 1, 2, 8 and 10, resulting in four mutated peptides. Each peptide was separately conjugated with either chlorogenate, carnosate, gallate, or rosmarinate given their known anti-tumor activities, creating dual targeting compounds. Molecular docking studies were conducted with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), to which the original peptide sequence is known to bind, as well as the estrogen receptor (ERα) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) using both Autodock Vina and FireDock. Based on docking results, peptide conjugates and peptides were selected and subjected to molecular dynamics simulations. MMGBSA calculations were used to further probe the binding energies. ADME studies revealed that the compounds were not CYP substrates, though most were Pgp substrates. Additionally, most of the peptides and conjugates showed MDCK permeability. Our results indicated that several of the peptide conjugates enhanced binding interactions with the receptors and resulted in stable receptor-ligand complexes; Furthermore, they may successfully target ERα and PPARα in addition to EGFR and may be further explored for synthesis and biological studies for therapeutic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Synthesis and biological activity · Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, USA
Funding
Fordham Univesity
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Peptide-Based Treatment: A Promising Cancer Therapy10.1155/2015/761820 ↗
2. Seek & Destroy, use of targeting peptides for cancer detection and drug delivery10.1016/j.bmc.2017.08.052 ↗
3. Scodeller, P., and Asciutto, E.K. (2020). Targeting Tumors Using Peptides. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25040808 ↗
4. Yuan, X., and Xu, Y. (2018). Recent trends and applications of molecular modeling in GPCR-ligand recognition and structure based design. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19072105 ↗
5. Synthesis of small peptide compounds, molecular docking, and inhibitory activity evaluation against phosphatases PTP1B and SHP210.2147/DDDT.S186614 ↗
6. Feiner, R.C., Kemker, I., Krutzke, L., Allmendinger, E., Mandell, D.J., Sewald, N., Kochanek, S., and Müller, K.M. (2020). EGFR-Binding Peptides: From Computational Design towards Tumor-Targeting of Adeno-Associated Virus Capsids. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21249535 ↗
7. Trial Watch: Peptide vaccines in cancer therapy10.4161/onci.26621 ↗
8. Peptide-Drug Conjugates and Their Targets in Advanced Cancer Therapies10.3389/fchem.2020.00571 ↗
9. Recent Advances in Tumor-Targeting Anticancer Drug Conjugates10.1016/j.bmc.2005.04.084 ↗
10. Peptides as a platform for targeted therapeutics for cancer: Peptide–drug conjugates (PDCs)10.1039/D0CS00556H ↗
11. He, R., Finan, B., Mayer, J.P., and DiMarchi, R.D. (2019). Peptide Conjugates with Small Molecules Designed to Enhance Efficacy and Safety. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24101855 ↗
12. A Smart Tumor Targeting Peptide–Drug Conjugate, PHLIP-SS-DOX: Synthesis and Cellular Uptake on MCF-7 and MCF-7/Adr Cells
13. Synthesis, biological studies and molecular dynamics of new anticancer RGD-based peptide conjugates for targeted drug delivery10.1016/j.bmc.2015.12.020 ↗
14. Azqueta, A., and Collins, A. (2016). Polyphenols and DNA Damage: A Mixed Blessing. Nutrients, 8.10.3390/nu8120785 ↗
15. Shaikh, A.A., Braakhuis, A.J., and Bishop, K.S. (2019). The Mediterranean Diet and Breast Cancer: A Personalised Approach. Healthcare, 7.10.3390/healthcare7030104 ↗
16. Functions of polyphenols and its anticancer properties in biomedical research: A narrative review10.21037/tcr-20-2359 ↗
17. Inhibitory Effects of Rosemary Extracts, Carnosic Acid and Rosmarinic Acid on the Growth of Various Human Cancer Cell Line10.1007/s11130-010-0166-4 ↗
18. Roles of Chlorogenic Acid on Regulating Glucose and Lipids Metabolism: A Review10.1155/2013/801457 ↗
19. Anticancer effects of gallic acid isolated from Indonesian herbal medicine, Phaleria macrocarpa (Scheff.) Boerl, on human cancer cell lines
20. In Vitro and in Vivo Antitumoral Effects of Combinations of Polyphenols, or Polyphenols and Anticancer Drugs: Perspectives on Cancer Treatment10.3390/ijms16059236 ↗
21. Chen, H., Yao, K., Nadas, J., Bode, A.M., Malakhova, M., Oi, N., Li, H., Lubet, R.A., and Dong, Z. (2012). Prediction of Molecular Targets of Cancer Preventing Flavonoid Compounds Using Computational Methods. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0038261 ↗
22. Chen, H., Yao, K., Chang, X., Shim, J., Kim, H., Malakhova, M., Kim, D., Bode, A.M., and Dong, Z. (2015). Computational and Biochemical Discovery of RSK2 as a Novel Target for Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG). PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0130049 ↗
23. Aminpour, M., Montemagno, C., and Tuszynski, J.A. (2019). An Overview of Molecular Modeling for Drug Discovery with Specific Illustrative Examples of Applications. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24091693 ↗
24. Bridging Molecular Docking to Molecular Dynamics in Exploring Ligand-Protein Recognition Process: An Overview10.3389/fphar.2018.00923 ↗
25. Identification of polyphenols from Broussonetia papyrifera as SARS CoV-2 main protease inhibitors using in silico docking and molecular dynamics simulation approaches10.1080/07391102.2020.1802347 ↗
26. Binding Mode Investigation of Polyphenols from Scrophularia Targeting Human Aldose Reductase Using Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations10.1155/2015/434256 ↗
27. PPAR-α Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments10.3389/fonc.2021.599995 ↗
28. Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in triple negative breast cancer: New discoveries and practical insights for drug development10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.12.010 ↗
29. Small Peptide Ligands for Targeting EGFR in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells10.1038/s41598-019-38574-y ↗
30. Cross-talk between estradiol receptor and EGFR/IGF-IR signaling pathways in estrogen-responsive breast cancers: Focus on the role and impact of proteoglycans10.1016/j.matbio.2013.09.002 ↗
31. Jeong, J., Kim, H., and Choi, J. (2019). In Silico Molecular Docking and In Vivo Validation with Caenorhabditis elegans to Discover Molecular Initiating Events in Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework: Case Study on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Estrogen and Androgen Receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20051209 ↗
32. ACPP: A webserver for prediction and design of anticancer peptides10.1007/s10989-014-9435-7 ↗
33. Raghava GPS. In Silico Models for Designing and Discovering Novel Anticancer Peptides10.1038/srep02984 ↗
34. (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2020). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0.
35. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction10.1038/nmeth.3213 ↗
36. Zhang, Y. (2008). I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinform., 9.10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 ↗
37. I-TASSER: A unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction10.1038/nprot.2010.5 ↗
38. Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment10.1093/bioinformatics/btt447 ↗
39. Roll: A new algorithm for the detection of protein pockets and cavities with a rolling probe sphere10.1093/bioinformatics/btp599 ↗
40. Cipolletti, M., Fernandez, V.S., Montalesi, E., Marino, M., and Fiocchetti, M. (2018). Beyond the Antioxidant Activity of Dietary Polyphenols in Cancer: The Modulation of Estrogen Receptors (ERs) Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19092624 ↗
41. Substituted 2-[(4-Aminomethyl)Phenoxy]-2-Methylpropionic Acid PPARα Agonists. 1. Discovery of a Novel Series of Potent HDLc Raising Agent10.1021/jm058056x ↗
42. 4-Amino-6-arylamino-pyrimidine-5-carbaldehyde hydrazones as potent ErbB-2/EGFR dual kinase inhibitors10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.07.020 ↗
43. AutoDock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization and Multithreading10.1002/jcc.21334 ↗
44. Schneidman, D., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H.J. (2002, January 17–21). Efficient Unbound Docking of Rigid Molecules. Proceedings of the Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Second International Workshop, WABI, Rome, Italy.
45. FireDock: A Web Server for Fast Interaction Refinement in Molecular Docking10.1093/nar/gkn186 ↗
46. PLIP 2021: Expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA10.1093/nar/gkab294 ↗
47. Predicting Binding Free Energies of PDE2 Inhibitors. The Difficulties of Protein Conformation10.1038/s41598-018-23039-5 ↗
48. Effect of hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions on the potency of ss-alanine analogs of G-protein coupled glucagon receptor inhibitors10.1002/prot.25807 ↗
49. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 ↗
50. Molecular modeling study of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by multiple docking strategies and prime/MM GBSA calculation10.1002/jcc.21859 ↗
51. ADMETlab 2.0: An integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties10.1093/nar/gkab255 ↗
52. Determination and Analysis of Agonist and Antagonist Potential of Naturally Occurring Flavonoids for Estrogen Receptor (ERα) by Various Parameters and Molecular Modelling Approach10.1038/s41598-019-43768-5 ↗
53. Ma, Y., Wang, S., Xu, W., Wang, R., and Chou, K. (2012). Design novel dual agonists for treating type-2 diabetes by targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors with core hopping approach. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0038546 ↗
54. Chen, G., Seukep, A.J., and Guo, M. (2020). Recent advances in molecular docking for the research and discovery of potential marine drugs. Mar. Drugs., 18.10.3390/md18110545 ↗
55. Evaluation of drug repositioning by molecular docking of pharmaceutical resources available in the brazilian healthcare systems against SARS-CoV210.1016/j.imu.2021.100539 ↗
56. Covalent docking using autodock: Two-point attractor and flexible side chain methods10.1002/pro.2733 ↗
57. Function of estrogen receptor tyrosine 537 in hormone binding, DNA binding and transactivation10.1021/bi9911132 ↗
58. Grande, F., Rizzuti, B., Occhiuzzi, M.A., Ioele, G., Casacchia, T., Gelmini, F., Guzzi, R., Garofalo, A., and Statti, G. (2018). Identification by Molecular Docking of Homoisoflavones from Leopoldia comosa as Ligands of Estrogen Receptors. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23040894 ↗
59. The estrogen receptor and polyphenos: Molecular simulation studies of their interactions, a review10.1007/s10311-006-0065-y ↗
60. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and cancer: Challenges and opportunities10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01383.x ↗
61. Fibrates, glitazones, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179689 ↗
62. PPARs are a unique set of fatty acid regulated transcription factors controlling both lipid metabolism and inflammation10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.02.014 ↗
63. Structure of the PPARα and –γ ligand binding domain in complex with AZ 242; ligand selectivity and agonist activation in the PPAR family10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00634-7 ↗
64. Novel Phenoxazinones as Potent Agonist of PPAR-α: Design, Synthesis, Molecular Docking and in Vivo Studies10.1186/s12944-018-0764-y ↗
65. Catalytic control in the EGF receptor and its connection to general kinase regulatory mechanisms10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.004 ↗
66. The Dynamic Structure of the Estrogen Receptor10.4061/2011/812540 ↗
67. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor10.1038/39645 ↗
68. Structural and functional diversity of estrogen receptor ligands10.2174/1568026615666150413154841 ↗
69. Structural determinants of ligand binding selectivity between the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors10.1073/pnas.241410198 ↗
70. Martin-Fernandez, M.L., Clarke, D.T., Roberts, S.K., Zanetti-Domingues, L.C., and Gervasio, F.L. (2019). Structure and Dynamics of the EGF Receptor as Revealed by Experiments and Simulations and its Relevance to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cells, 8.10.3390/cells8040316 ↗
71. Hasenahuer, M.A., Barletta, G.P., Fernandez-Alberti, S., Parisi, G., and Fornasari, M.S. (2017). Pockets as structural descriptors of EGFR kinase conformations. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0189147 ↗
72. Structure and dynamic behavior of Toll-like receptor 2 subfamily triggered by malarial glycosylphosphatidylinostiols of Plasmodium falciparum10.1111/febs.12541 ↗
73. Dokcking Study: PPARs interaction with selected alternative plasticizers to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
74. Suitability of MMGBSA for the selection of correct ligand binding modes from docking results10.1111/cbdd.13446 ↗
75. Lokhande, K.B., Ballav, S., Yadav, R.S., Venkateswara Swamy, K., and Basu, S. (2020). Probing intermolecular interactions and binding stability of kaempferol, quercetin and resveratrol derivatives with PPAR-γ: Docking, molecular dynamics and MM/GBSA approach to reveal potent PPAR- γ agonist against cancer. J. Biomol. Struc. Dyn., 1–11.10.1080/07391102.2020.1820380 ↗
76. Structure guided design and binding analysis of EGFR inhibiting analogues of erlotinib and AEE788 using ensemble docking, molecular dynamics and MMGBSA10.1039/C6RA08517B ↗
77. Al-Anazi, M., Al-Najjar, B.O., and Khairuddean, M. (2018). Structure-based drug design studies toward the discovery of novel chalcone derivatives as potential epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23123203 ↗
78. Design, synthesis, mechanistic studies and in silico ADME predictions of benzimidazole derivatives as novel antifungal agents10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103956 ↗
79. ADME-SAR: A comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties10.1021/ci300367a ↗
80. MDCKpred: A web-tool to calculate MDCK permeability coefficient of small molecule using membrane-interaction chemical features10.1080/15376516.2018.1499840 ↗
81. Lipophilicity screening of novel drug-like compounds and comparison of cLogP10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.078 ↗