journal article·2022-01-13Open access

Design and Simulation of Manufacturing Organizations Based on a Novel Function-Based Concept

Mareike Winkler, Sergio Gallego-García, Manuel García-García

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

Historically, researchers and managers have often failed to consider organizations as a sum of functions leading to a set of capabilities that produce a product that can serve society’s needs. Furthermore, functions have increased with the development of industrial revolutions, however, many manufacturing organizations have not realized their full potential. As a result, many industrial organizations do not know why, where, and when the existing functions and projects for implementing new functions fail where tactical and strategic functions of a manufacturing organization are commonly over-seen. Thus, the aim of this research was to propose a holistic approach for manufacturing organizations in order to model their functions enabling the assessment, design, management, and control of operations and performance as well as to identify improvement potentials. For this purpose, a conceptual model was developed based on the evolution of functions along with the industrial revolutions. Moreover, using the conceptual model, manufacturing organizations can be modeled, considering common organizational functions in the respective areas of production, maintenance, and quality, etc., in the three planning horizons—strategic, tactical, and operative. As a result, the model serves as a basis for the integral management and control of manufacturing organizations. Moreover, it can be also used as a basis framework for a digital twin model for organizations. Thus, a system dynamics simulation model based on the conceptual model was developed for a generic organization. The goal of the simulation model is to provide an exemplary digital model of a manufacturing organization in which the different functions are applied with different methods, systems, and/or individuals along the development phases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Quality and Supply Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Social Sciences, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany

Industrial Engineering Technologies of the International School of Doctorate, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain

Department of Construction and Fabrication Engineering, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: An outlook10.1155/2016/3159805 ↗
2. Industry 4.0–A glimpse10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 ↗
3. Self-optimizing production systems10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.114 ↗
4. Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682 ↗
5. A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005 ↗
6. New IT driven service-oriented smart manufacturing: Framework and characteristics10.1109/TSMC.2017.2723764 ↗
7. A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198 ↗
8. Thombansen, U., Schuttler, J., Auerbach, T., Beckers, M., Buchholz, G., Eppelt, U., Gloy, Y., Fritz, P., Kratz, S., and Lose, J. (2011, January 20–22). Model-based self-optimization for manufacturing systems. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Con-current Enterprising (ICE), Aachen, Germany.
9. Viles, E., Ormazábal, M., and Lleó, A. (2018). Industry 4.0: A classification scheme. Closing the Gap between Practice and Research in Industrial Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-58409-6 ↗
10. A model-based Digital Twin to support responsive manufacturing systems10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.043 ↗
11. Rouhani, A., and Fazelhashemi, S. (2009). Forget about TPM, Rasa Cultural Services Institute. [1st ed.].
12. An integrated modelling method to support manufacturing systems analysis and design10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00094-3 ↗
13. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 ↗
14. Scheer, A.W. (2013). Industrie 4.0: Wie Sehen Produktionsprozesse im Jahr 2020 Aus, IMC AG.
15. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.010.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 ↗
16. Dhilon, B.S. (2006). Maintainability, Maintenance and Reliability for Engineers, Taylor and Francis.10.1201/9781420006780 ↗
17. DIN, E. (2010). 13306: Instandhaltung–Begriffe der Instandhaltung, Maintenance Terminology.
18. Maintenance assistance application of Engineering to Order manufacturing equipment: A Product Service System (PSS) approach10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.263 ↗
19. Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A., Knezevic, J., and Ait-Kadi, D. (2009). Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0 ↗
20. Implementation of total productive maintenance in support of an established total quality pro-gramme10.1080/09544129610522 ↗
21. Matyas, K. (2013). Instandhaltungslogistik: Qualität und Produktivität Steigern, Carl Hanser Verlag. [5th ed.].10.3139/9783446435896.fm ↗
22. Pawellek, I.G. (2013). Planung der Instandhaltung. Integrierte Instandhaltung und Ersatzteillogistik, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31383-7 ↗
23. Voigt, K.I., Steinmann, D.I.F., Bauer, D.I.J., and Dremel, A. (2013). Condition Monitoring Als Schlüsseltechnologie–Eine Analyse Der Anforderungen an Neue Geschäftsmodelle Für Den Remote Service, Heinz Nixdorf Institut-Universität Paderborn.
24. The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.110 ↗
25. Ivanov, D., and Sokolov, B.V. (2010). Adaptive Supply Chain Management, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-952-7 ↗
26. Chopra, S., and Meindl, P. (2007). Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Springer.
27. Baumgarten, H. (2008). Das Beste der Logistik. Innovationen, Strategien, Umsetzungen, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-78405-0 ↗
28. Schuh, G., and Stich, V. (2013). Logistikmanagement, Springer Vieweg. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-28992-7 ↗
29. Supply Chain Flexibility: Building a New Model
30. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system: An effective tool for production management10.1108/01409170510784878 ↗
31. Zäpfel, G. (2001). Grundzüge des Produktions-und Logistikmanagement, Walter de Gruyter.10.1524/9783486700824 ↗
32. Hackstein, R. (1984). Produktionsplanung und-Steuerung (PPS): Ein Handbuch Für Die Betriebspraxis, VDI-Verlag.
33. Grundlagen der produktionsplanung und-steuerung
34. 8600 Unternehmen Gaben Auskunft
35. Kirby, C., and Brosa, N. (2011). La Logística Como Factor De Competitividad De Las Pymes En Las Américas, Banco I nteramericano de Desarrollo.10.18235/0007858 ↗
36. Muñoz Bosch, M. (2008). ERP Para La Pequeña Empresa, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
37. Schilberg, D., Meisen, T., and Reinhard, R. (2013, January 23–25). Virtual Production-The connection of the modules through the Virtual Production Intelligence. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2013, San Francisco, CA, USA.
38. Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors10.1177/0954405417736547 ↗
39. Reggelin, T. (2012). Schneller Entscheiden. Log.Kompass, DVV Media Group.
40. A model for manufacturing systems simulation with a control dimension10.1016/S1569-190X(02)00097-7 ↗
41. Borshchev, A. (2013). Simulation Modeling with AnyLogic: Agent Based, Discrete Event and System Dynamics Methods, DVV Media Group.10.1002/9781118762745.ch12 ↗
42. Florescu, A., and Barabas, S.A. (2020). Modeling and simulation of a flexible manufacturing system—A basic component of industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228300 ↗
43. Campuzano, F., and Bru, J.M. (2011). Supply Chain Simulation: A System Dynamics Approach for Improving Performance, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-0-85729-719-8 ↗
44. Siestrup, G., and Zeeb, D. (2017). Reifegradbestimmung: Der Weg Zur Supply Chain 4.0, Hochschule Furtwangen.
45. IBM and Germany 1922–194110.1057/omj.2008.31 ↗
46. Gallego-García, S., Reschke, J., and García-García, M. (2019). Design and simulation of a capacity management model using a digital twin approach based on the viable system model: Case study of an automotive plant. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245567 ↗
47. Auerbach, T., Bauhoff, F., Beckers, M., Behnen, D., Brecher, C., Brosze, T., and Esser, M. (2011). Selbstoptimierende produktionssysteme. Integrative Produktionstechnik Für Hochlohnländer, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-20693-1_6 ↗
48. Mayer, M.P. (2012). Entwicklung Eines Kognitionsergonomischen Konzeptes und Eines Simulationssystems Für die Robotergestützte Montage, Shaker.
49. Hinckeldeyn, J., Dekkers, R., Altfeld, N., and Kreutzfeldt, J. (2010, January 8–11). Bottleneck-based synchronisation of engineering and manufacturing. Proceedings of the International Association for Management of Technology IAMOT 2010 Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Management of Technology, Cairo, Egypt.