journal article·2021-11-16Open access

Machine Learning Technique to Improve an Impedance Matching Characteristic of a Bent Monopole Antenna

Jaeyul Choo, Thi Ha Anh Pho, Yong-Hwa Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 22

Abstract

We designed the wire monopole antenna bent at three points by applying a machine learning technique to achieve a good impedance matching characteristic. After performing the deep neural network (DNN)-based training, we validated our machine learning model by evaluating mean squared error and R-squared score. Considering the mean squared error of about zero and R-squared score of about one, the performance prediction by the resulting machine learning model showed a high accuracy compared with that by the numerical electromagnetic simulation. Finally, we interpreted the operating principle of the antennas with a good impedance matching characteristic by analyzing equivalent circuits corresponding to their structures. The accomplished works in this research provide us with the possibility to use the machine learning technique in the antenna design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antenna Design and Analysis · Antenna Design and Optimization · Microwave Engineering and Waveguides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronics Engineering, Andong National University, 1375 Gyengdong-ro, Andong-si 36729, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea

Department of Electronic Engineering, Myongji University, 116 Myongji-ro, Cheoin-gu, Yongin-si 17058, Gyeonggi-do, Korea

Department of Data Science, Korea National University of Transportation, 157, Cheoldobangmulgwan-ro, Uiwang-si 16106, Gyeonggi-do, Korea

Funding

Korea National University of Transportation · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Balanis, C.A. (2016). Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design: Analysis and Design, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.. [4th ed.].
2. Kraus, J.D., and Marhefka, R.J. (2002). Antennas for All Applications, McGraw-Hill. [3rd ed.].
3. Vertically polarized dipoles and monopoles, directivity effective height and antenna factor
4. Broadband electrically small antenna using two electromagnetically coupled radiators10.1002/mop.25164 ↗
5. Electromagnetically coupled small broadband monopole antenna10.1109/LAWP.2004.824171 ↗
6. Printed monopole antenna with tapered feed line, feedregion and patch for super wideband applications10.1049/iet-map.2013.0094 ↗
7. A novel pattern-reconfigurable antenna using switched printed elements10.1109/LAWP.2012.2218212 ↗
8. Compact pattern-reconfigurable monopole antenna using parasitic strips10.1109/LAWP.2016.2588581 ↗
9. Note on impedance characteristics of L-shaped wire monopole antenna10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(20000705)26:1<22::AID-MOP7>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
10. Compact broadband microstrip-line-fed sleeve monopole antenna for DTV application and ground plane effect10.1109/LAWP.2008.2004213 ↗
11. Characterization of meander dipole antennas with a geometry-based, frequency-independent lumped element model10.1109/LAWP.2012.2191380 ↗
12. Short low- and medium- frequency antenna performance10.1109/MAP.2005.1599168 ↗
13. Bent inverted-F antenna for WLAN units10.1002/mop.23405 ↗
14. Disk-loaded monopoles with parallel strip elements10.1109/8.743844 ↗
15. Radiation characteristics of bent-wire antennas10.1109/TEMC.1970.303078 ↗
16. Prediction of radiation losses and emission from a bent wire by a network model10.1109/TEMC.2006.879331 ↗
17. Design of a ceiling-mounted reader antenna to maximize the readable volume coverage ratio for an indoor UHF RFID application10.1002/mop.30699 ↗
18. Handset antenna design: Practice and theory10.2528/PIER07111302 ↗
19. A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the radiation Q of electrically small antennas10.1109/8.496253 ↗
20. Physical limitations of antenna10.1109/TAP.2003.814754 ↗
21. Design of electrically small wire antennas using a Pareto genetic algorithm10.1109/TAP.2004.842404 ↗
22. Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics10.1109/TAP.2004.823969 ↗
23. Machine learning techniques for optimizing design of double T-shaped monopole antenna10.1109/TAP.2020.2966051 ↗
24. A modified efficient KNN method for antenna optimization and design10.1109/TAP.2020.3001743 ↗
25. Multiparameter modeling with ANN for antenna design10.1109/TAP.2018.2823775 ↗
26. Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning, McGraw Hill. OCLC 36417892.
27. Mallory, H., Shaun, V.A., Mao, G.F., and Wang, J. (2018, January 9–11). An Overview of Google Brain and Its Applications. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data and Education, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-6358-7.
28. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS’2012), Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
29. (2021, September 29). What Is GPUs?. Available online: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/processors/what-is-a-gpu.html.
30. Albawi, S., Mohammed, T.A., and Al-Zawi, S. (2017, January 21–23). Understanding of a convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), Antalya, Turkey.10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186 ↗
31. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., and Wolf, L. (2014, January 23–28). Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.220 ↗
32. Delalleau, O., and Bengio, Y. (2011, January 12–14). Shallow vs. deep sum-product networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24 (NIPS’2011), Granada, Spain.
33. An Introduction to Regression Analysis
34. Haykin, S.S. (1999). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice Hall. [2nd ed.].
35. A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 ↗
36. Sammut, C., and Webb, G.I. (2011). Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8 ↗
37. Chicco, D., Warrens, M.J., and Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE, and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Comput. Sci.10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
38. A new typology design of performance metrics to measure errors in machine learning regression algorithms
39. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), Haifa, Israel.
40. Performance analysis of various activation functions in artificial neural networks10.1088/1742-6596/1237/2/022030 ↗
41. Kingma, D., and Ba, J. (2015, January 7–9). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA.
42. Özgür, A., and Nar, F. (2020, January 5–7). Effect of Dropout layer on Classical Regression Problems. Proceedings of the 2020 28th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Gaziantep, Turkey.10.1109/SIU49456.2020.9302054 ↗
43. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the lasso10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
44. Developments in Linear Regression Methodology: 1959–1982
45. (2021, September 29). Femtet. Available online: https://www.muratasoftware.com/en.
46. A wideband equivalent circuit electric dipoles10.1109/TAP.2020.2996765 ↗
47. Analysis of Hertz’s experimentum crucis on electromagnetic waves10.1109/MAP.2016.2569427 ↗
48. Revisiting Heinrich Hertz’s 1888 laboratory10.1109/MAP.2018.2839969 ↗
49. Pozar, D.M. (2011). Microwave Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.. [4th ed.].
50. Gupta, K.G., Garg, R., Bahl, I., and Bhartia, P. (1996). Microstrip linEs and Slotlines, Artech House, Inc.. [2nd ed.].