Show source-provided references
2. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: Implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients
10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.14 ↗5. Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: An in vitro study
10.1016/j.jocn.2006.12.007 ↗6. Clinical outcome and surgical strategies for late post-traumatic kyphosis after failed thoracolumbar fracture operation: Case report and literature review
10.1097/MD.0000000000008770 ↗7. Shin, J.K., Lim, B.-Y., Goh, T.S., Son, S.M., Kim, H.-S., Lee, J.S., and Lee, C.-S. (2018). Effect of the screw type (S2-alar-iliac and iliac), screw length, and screw head angle on the risk of screw and adjacent bone failures after a spinopelvic fixation technique: A finite element analysis. PLoS ONE, 13.
10.1371/journal.pone.0201801 ↗12. Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy—a phantom study
10.1088/1361-6560/ab8ba0 ↗13. The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: A systematic review
10.4137/CMAMD.S20354 ↗15. A novel spine fixation system made entirely of carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK composite: An in vitro mechanical evaluation
10.1155/2020/4796136 ↗16. Influence of contact pressure, cross-shear and counterface material on the wear of PEEK and CFR-PEEK for orthopaedic applications
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.005 ↗17. Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: A comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new “carbon-strategy”
10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.013 ↗19. Mechanical properties of an improved 3D-printed rhombic dodecahedron stainless steel lattice structure of variable cross section
10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.006 ↗23. Bai, L., Zhang, J., Chen, X., Yi, C., Chen, R., and Zhang, Z. (2018). Configuration Optimization Design of Ti6Al4V Lattice Structure Formed by SLM. Materials, 11.
10.3390/ma11101856 ↗25. Isolated and modulated effects of topology and material type on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.029 ↗26. Kang, I., Choi, M., Lee, D., and Noh, G. (2020). Effect of Passive Support of the Spinal Muscles on the Biomechanics of a Lumbar Finite Element Model. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10186278 ↗30. Haptically integrated simulation of a finite element model of thoracolumbar spine combining offline biomechanical response analysis of intervertebral discs
10.1016/j.cad.2010.08.003 ↗31. Goh, T.S., Lim, B.-Y., Lee, J.S., and Lee, C.-S. (2020). Identification of surgical plan for syndesmotic fixation procedure based on finite element method. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10124349 ↗33. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: Predictive power of models improves when combined together
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.002 ↗35. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc: Finite element analysis of the L3–L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads
10.1097/00007632-199503150-00010 ↗36. Falkowska, A., Seweryn, A., and Skrodzki, M. (2020). Strength properties of a porous titanium alloy Ti6Al4V with diamond structure obtained by laser power bed fusion (LPBF). Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13225138 ↗37. Huang, Y.P., Du, C.F., Cheng, C.K., Zhong, Z.C., Chen, X.W., Wu, G., Li, Z.-C., Ye, J.-D., Lin, J.-H., and Wang, L.Z. (2016). Preserving posterior complex can prevent adjacent segment disease following posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgeries: A finite element analysis. PLoS ONE, 11.
10.1371/journal.pone.0166452 ↗39. Dowling, N.E. (2015). Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Pearson. [4th ed.].
40. ANSYS Inc. (2010). Introduction to Contacts—ANSYS Mechanical Structural Nonlinearities, ANSYS Inc.
41. ANSYS (2019, June 05). ANSYS Help Documentation. Available online: www.ansys.com.