Evaluation of Visual and Nonvisual Levels of Daylight from Spectral Power Distributions Considering Orientation and Seasonality
Source abstract
Abstract
The evaluation of both visual and nonvisual effects from the spectral power distribution (SPD) of outdoor light is critical in lighting design. The dome-light SPD characteristically changes continuously depending on the seasonality, orientation, altitude of the sun or hour of the day. Traditional photopic parameters, such as the illuminance, luminance or correlated colour temperature (CCT), have been widely studied, but presently, there is no melanopic measurement or evaluation method. This article discusses the processes involved in establishing a simple method to determine the SPD of daylight and solar radiation over the skydome in a location to accurately account for the effects of both photopic and circadian levels around a location. Once per month for one year, natural daylight was spectrally measured in the city of Zaragoza (Spain); radiometric and photometric characteristics were analysed by season; and circadian effects were calculated in terms of standard parameters described by the Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE), factors recommended by normative and scientific backgrounds. Finally, we suggest that the best parameter is the melanopic versus photopic irradiance ratio, which achieves reliable results at simplifying and correlating calculations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Impact of Light on Environment and Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Urban Heat Island Mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Applied Physics Department, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Department of Ophthalmology, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Funding
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. ISO 15469: 2004 (2003). Spatial Distribution of Daylight—CIE Standard General Sky, CIE Central Bureau.
2. A methodology for designing and calibrating an artificial sky to simulate ISO/CIE sky types with an artificial sun10.1080/15502724.2014.977391 ↗
3. Kim, C., and Kim, K. (2019). Development of sky luminance and daylight illuminance prediction methods for lighting energy saving in office buildings. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12040592 ↗
4. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance10.1016/0038-092X(90)90055-H ↗
5. Review of solar irradiance and daylight illuminance modeling and sky classification10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.063 ↗
6. BS EN 12464-1:2011 (2011). Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places—Part 1: Indoor Work Places, BSI Standards Publication.
7. UNE EN 12464-2:2016 (2011). Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places—Part 2: Outdoor Work Places, BSI Standards Publication.
8. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: The outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456 ↗
9. Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age10.1016/j.tins.2013.10.004 ↗
10. CIE S 026/E:2018 (2018). CIE System for Metrology of Optical Radiation for ipRGC-Influenced Responses to Light, CIE Central Bureau.
11. Implementing non-image-forming effects of light in the built environment: A review on what we need10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.035 ↗
12. CIE (2019). Position Statement on Non-Visual Effects of Light—Recommending Proper Light at the Proper Time, CIE Central Bureau. [2nd ed.].
13. International WELL Building Institute (IWBI) WELL Building Standard (2021, May 12). LIGHT. WELL v2. Q2 2021. Available online: https://standard.wellcertified.com/well.
14. Brown, T., Brainard, G., Cajochen, C., Czeisler, C., Hanifin, J., Lockley, S., Lucas, R., Munch, M., O’Hagan, J., and Peirson, S. (2020). Recommendations for healthy daytime, evening, and night-time indoor light exposure. Preprints.10.20944/preprints202012.0037.v1 ↗
15. The Lighting environment, its metrology, and non-visual responses10.3389/fneur.2021.624861 ↗
16. Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: Evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06405.2001 ↗
17. Matching CIE illuminants to measured spectral power distributions: A method to evaluate non-visual potential of daylight in two European cities10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.021 ↗
18. Bellia, L., and Fragliasso, F. (2021). Good places to live and sleep well: A literature review about the role of architecture in determining non-visual effects of light. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18031002 ↗
19. Wyszecki, G., and Stiles, W.S. (1982). Color Science, Wiley.
20. Sánchez-Cano, A., and Aporta, J. (2020). Optimization of lighting projects including photopic and circadian criteria: A simplified action protocol. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228068 ↗
21. Gall, D., and Bieske, K. (2004). Definition and Measurement of Circadian Radiometric Quantities, Ilmenau University of Technology.
22. Data-driven spectral sky models: A review
23. Knoop, M., Weber, N., and Diakite, A. (2019, January 14–22). Approach to analyse seasonal and geographical variations in daylight illuminants. Proceedings of the CIE x046: 2019 Proceedings of the 29th CIE Session, Washington DC, USA.10.25039/x46.2019.OP31 ↗
24. Color and spectral analysis of daylight in southern Europe10.1364/JOSAA.18.001325 ↗
25. Variation of outdoor illumination as a function of solar elevation and light pollution10.1038/srep26756 ↗
26. Colorimetric analysis of outdoor illumination across varieties of atmospheric conditions10.1364/JOSAA.33.001049 ↗
27. Spectral energy distribution of daylight10.1364/JOSA.54.000937 ↗
28. A review of the CIE general sky classification approaches10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.018 ↗
29. Modelling the spectral sensitivity of the human circadian system10.1177/1477153511430474 ↗
30. The impact of room surface reflectance on corneal illuminance and rule-of-thumb equations for circadian lighting design10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.056 ↗
31. Light as a circadian stimulus for architectural lighting10.1177/1477153516682368 ↗
32. Circadian-effective light and its impact on alertness in office workers10.1177/1477153517750006 ↗
33. Non-visual effects of light: How to use light to promote circadian entrainment and elicit alertness10.1177/1477153517721598 ↗
34. The impact of daytime light exposures on sleep and mood in office workers10.1016/j.sleh.2017.03.005 ↗
35. Analysis of circadian stimulus allowed by daylighting in hospital rooms10.1177/1477153515592948 ↗
36. Spatial and spectral illumination design for energy-efficient circadian lighting10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.004 ↗
37. Li, M., Wu, P., Ding, J., Yao, Q., and Ju, J. (2020). The circadian effect versus mesopic vision effect in road lighting applications. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10196975 ↗
38. Proposal to calculate the circadian component in lighting projects
39. Efficient circadian daylighting: A proposed equation, experimental validation, and the consequent importance of room surface reflectance10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109784 ↗
40. Human-centric lighting performance of shading panels in architecture: A benchmarking study with lab scale physical models under real skies10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.088 ↗
41. Use of illuminance as a guide to effective light delivery during daylight photodynamic therapy in the UK10.1111/bjd.15146 ↗
42. O’Mahoney, P., Khazova, M., Eadie, E., and Ibbotson, S. (2019). Measuring daylight: A review of dosimetry in daylight photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceuticals, 12.10.3390/ph12040143 ↗
43. Münch, M., Wirz-Justice, A., Brown, S.A., Kantermann, T., Martiny, K., Stefani, O., Vetter, C., Wright, K.P., Wulff, K., and Skene, D.J. (2020). The role of daylight for humans: Gaps in current knowledge. Clocks Sleep, 2.10.3390/clockssleep2010008 ↗
44. IMI–Report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia10.1167/iovs.18-25967 ↗