Permeability of Coking Coals and Patterns of Its Change in Leninsky Area, Kuznetsk Coal Basin, Russia
Source abstract
Abstract
A prediction of the permeability of gas-bearing coking coals in the Leninsky area, Kuznetsk coal basin (Kuzbass), which is promising for the production of coal methane, was performed. The results of laboratory studies of coal permeability and cleat compressibility under hydrostatic stress conditions are presented. As the confining pressure increased by 8 times (from 1 MPa to 8 MPa), the coal permeability perpendicular to the butt cleat direction decreased by 6.7 times (from 60 mD to 9 mD). The coal cleat compressibility was 0.085 MPa−1. On the basis of the results of filtration tests and microstructural analysis of the coking coals, we provide the estimation of the permeability anisotropy along the bedding planes (perpendicular to the face and butt cleat directions). The predicted dependences of gas-bearing coking coal permeability perpendicular to the butt and face cleat directions on depth and on features of coal seam bedding were determined under uniaxial strain conditions. It was found that in the coking coal depth intervals, as the depth increased, their permeability decreased by 61–82%. The obtained results can be used to select facilities and to design industrial works for the extraction of coal methane in the region.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Coal Properties and Utilization · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chinakal Institute of Mining, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnyi ave. 54, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia
Funding
Russian Science Foundation
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Significance of gas flow in anisotropic coal seams to underground gas drainage10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.023 ↗
2. Impact of Effective Stress and Matrix Deformation on the Coal Fracture Permeability10.1007/s11242-014-0289-4 ↗
3. Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction10.1016/j.coal.2011.02.009 ↗
4. Evaluation of Relative Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs Based on Production Data: A Case Study in Qinshui Basin, China10.1007/s11053-018-9382-7 ↗
5. Non-uniform Distributions of Gas Pressure and Coal Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs Induced by the Loess Plateau Geomorphology: A Case Study in Ordos Basin, China10.1007/s11053-019-09566-6 ↗
6. Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data10.1016/j.coal.2011.12.009 ↗
7. Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams10.1306/05110504114 ↗
8. Thakur, P. (2017). Advanced Reservoir and Production Engineering for Coal Bed Methane, Elsevier BV.
9. Seidle, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering, PennWell Books.
10. Hydraulic Fracturing Effect on Filtration Resistance in Gas Drainage Hole Area in Coal10.1134/S1062739119025432 ↗
11. Experimental study of impact of anisotropy and heterogeneity on gas flow in coal. Part II: Permeability10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.033 ↗
12. Gash, B.W., Volz, R.F., Potter, G., and Corgan, J.M. (1992, January 14–17). The effect of cleat orientation and confining pressure on cleat porosity, permeability and relative permeability in coal. Proceedings of the International Coalbed Methane Conference, SPWLA/SCA Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
13. Multi-scale x-ray computed tomography analysis of coal microstructure and permeability changes as a function of effective stress10.1016/j.coal.2016.08.016 ↗
14. Stimulation of Underground Degassing in Coal Seams by Hydraulic Fracturing Method10.1134/S106273911706303X ↗
15. Modelling of anisotropic coal swelling and its impact on permeability behaviour for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery10.1016/j.coal.2010.12.003 ↗
16. An experimental study of the anisotropic permeability rule of coal containing gas10.1016/j.jngse.2018.02.026 ↗
17. Combined effects of directional compaction, non-Darcy flow and anisotropic swelling on coal seam gas extraction10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.009 ↗
18. Effect of stress on permeability of coal10.1016/0148-9062(75)91244-9 ↗
19. Permeability changes in coal: Analytical modeling10.1016/j.coal.2008.09.006 ↗
20. A Model for Changes in Coalbed Permeability during Primary and Enhanced Methane Recovery10.2118/87230-PA ↗
21. How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model10.2118/52607-PA ↗
22. Avdeev, A.P., Cherepovskiy, V.F., Sharov, G.N., and Uzvickiy, A.Z. (2003). Coal Base of Russia. Volume II. Coal Basins and Deposits of Western Siberia (Kuznetsk, Gorlovsky, West.-Siberian Basins; Deposits of Altai Region. and Altai Republic), Geoinform Center. (In Russian).
23. Laboratory Installation and Procedure to Determine Gas Permeability of Rocks10.1134/S1062739117052994 ↗
24. Sander, R., Pan, Z., Connell, L.D., Camilleri, M., and Heryanto, D. (2016, January 25–27). Experimental Investigation of Gas Diffusion in Coal–Comparison Between Crushed and Intact Core Samples. Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Perth, Australia.10.2118/182466-MS ↗
25. Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review10.1016/S0166-5162(97)00012-8 ↗
26. Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery10.1016/j.coal.2009.10.019 ↗
27. Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and Other Geologic Formations10.2118/12858-PA ↗
28. A review of experimental and numerical modeling of digital coalbed methane: Imaging, segmentation, fracture modeling and permeability prediction10.1016/j.coal.2020.103552 ↗
29. Porosity and permeability characterization of coal: A micro-computed tomography study10.1016/j.coal.2015.10.001 ↗
30. Dependence of fluid flow on cleat aperture distribution and aperture–length scaling: A case study from Gondwana coal seams of Raniganj Formation, Eastern India10.1007/s40789-019-00291-2 ↗
31. Method and means to estimate porosity distribution on the surface of polished section of coal10.1134/S1062739116061760 ↗
32. (2020, April 30). Analyzers of Fragments of the Microstructure of Solids. In Russian.
33. Seidle, J.P., Jeansonne, M.W., and Erickson, D.J. (1992, January 18–21). Application of Matchstick Geometry to Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals. Proceedings of the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, WY, USA.10.2523/24361-MS ↗
34. Robertson, E.P., and Christiansen, R.L. (2006, January 11–13). A Permeability Model for Coal and Other Fractured, Sorptive-Elastic Media. Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, OH, USA.10.2523/104380-MS ↗
35. Permeability of Idealized Fractured Rock10.2118/1289-PA ↗