ILRS Reference Point Determination Using Close Range Photogrammetry
Source abstract
Abstract
A global geodetic reference system (GGRS) is realized by physical points on the Earth’s surface and is referred to as a global geodetic reference frame (GGRF). The GGRF is derived by combining several space geodetic techniques, and the reference points of these techniques are the physical points of such a realization. Due to the weak physical connection between the space geodetic techniques, so-called local ties are introduced to the combination procedure. A local tie is the spatial vector defined between the reference points of two space geodetic techniques. It is derivable by local measurements at multitechnique stations, which operate more than one space geodetic technique. Local ties are a crucial component within the intertechnique combination; therefore, erroneous or outdated vectors affect the global results. In order to reach the ambitious accuracy goal of 1 mm for a global position, the global geodetic observing system (GGOS) aims for strategies to improve local ties, and, thus, the reference point determination procedures. In this contribution, close range photogrammetry is applied for the first time to determine the reference point of a laser telescope used for satellite laser ranging (SLR) at Geodetic Observatory Wettzell (GOW). A measurement campaign using various configurations was performed at the Satellite Observing System Wettzell (SOS-W) to evaluate the achievable accuracy and the measurement effort. The bias of the estimates were studied using an unscented transformation. Biases occur if nonlinear functions are replaced and are solved by linear substitute problems. Moreover, the influence of the chosen stochastic model onto the estimates is studied by means of various dispersion matrices of the observations. It is shown that the resulting standard deviations are two to three times overestimated if stochastic dependencies are neglected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GNSS positioning and interference · Inertial Sensor and Navigation · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Industrial Metrology, Faculty 1: Architecture · Civil Engineering · Geomatics, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, 60318 Frankfurt, Germany
Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy, 93444 Bad Kötzting, Germany
Funding
European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Plag, H.P., and Pearlman, M. (2009). Integrated scientific and societal user requirements and functional specifications for the GGOS. Global Geodetic Observing System—Meeting the Requirements of a Global Society on a Changing Planet in 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-02687-4 ↗
2. Church, J.A., Woodworth, P.L., Aarup, T., and Wilson, W.S. (2010). Geodetic Observations and Global Reference Frame Contributions to Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability. Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444323276 ↗
3. Accuracy Assessment of the ITRF Datum Definition10.1007/978-3-540-74584-6_16 ↗
4. Plag, H.P., and Pearlman, M. (2009). The goals, achievements, and tools of modern geodesy. Global Geodetic Observing System—Meeting the Requirements of a Global Society on a Changing Planet in 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-02687-4 ↗
5. ITRF2014: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions10.1002/2016JB013098 ↗
6. The 2008 DGFI realization of the ITRS: DTRF200810.1007/s00190-012-0567-2 ↗
7. Rummel, R. (2017). Zukunft der globalen Geodäsie und Fernerkundung aus Sicht des Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Potsdam. Handbuch der Geodäsie—Erdmessung und Satellitengeodäsie, Springer Reference Naturwissenschaften; Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-47100-5 ↗
8. Validation of Components of Local Ties10.1007/1345_2015_190 ↗
9. Altamimi, Z., Rebischung, P., Métivier, L., and Collilieux, X. (2017). Analysis and Results of ITRF2014, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie. IERS Technical Note 38, International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS).
10. GeoMetre (2020). Large-Scale Dimensional Measurements for Geodesy—A Joint Research Project within the European Metrology Research Programme EMPIR, EURAMET e.V.. European Commission (EC), Grant Number: 18SIB01.
11. García-Asenjo, L., Baselga, S., Atkins, C., and Garrigues, P. (2021). Development of a Submillimetric GNSS-Based Distance Meter for Length Metrology. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041145 ↗
12. Indirect approach to invariant point determination for SLR and VLBI systems: An assessment10.1007/s00190-006-0125-x ↗
13. Ultra-Precise Analytics
14. Kim, H., Yun, H., Hwang, J., and Hong, S. (2017). A Static Displacement Monitoring System for VLBI Antenna Using Close-Range Photogrammetry. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7111125 ↗
15. Gravitational Deformation of Ring-Focus Antennas for VGOS–First Investigations at the Onsala Twin Telescopes Project10.1007/s00190-019-01302-5 ↗
16. Luhmann, T., Robson, S., Kyle, S., and Boehm, J. (2019). Close-Range Photogrammetry and 3D Imaging, Walter de Gruyter GmbH. [3rd ed.].10.1515/9783110607253 ↗
17. Förstner, W., and Wrobel, B.P. (2016). Photogrammetric Computer Vision—Statistics, Geometry, Orientation and Reconstruction, Springer. [1st ed.]. Geometry and Computing 11.10.1007/978-3-319-11550-4 ↗
18. Decentering Distortion of Lenses
19. Close-Range Camera Calibration
20. Photogrammetric error sources and impacts on modeling and surveying in construction engineering applications10.1186/2213-7459-2-2 ↗
21. The Bundle Adjustment–Progress and Prospects
22. Free Net Analysis in Close-Range Photogrammetry
23. The International Laser Ranging Service10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6 ↗
24. Seitz, M. (2009). Kombination geodätischer Raumbeobachtungsverfahren zur Realisierung eines terrestrischen Referenzsystems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission].
25. New Mathematical Model for Reference Point Determination of an Azimuth-Elevation Type Radio Telescope10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000010 ↗
26. A Modified Approach for Automated Reference Point Determination of SLR and VLBI Telescopes10.1515/teme-2018-0053 ↗
27. Luhmann, T., and Schumacher, C. (2019). Zur Bestimmung des ILRS-Referenzpunktes am Satellite Observing System Wettzell. Photogrammetrie-Laserscanning-Optische 3D-Messtechnik: Beiträge der 18. Oldenburger 3D-Tage 2019, Wichmann Verlag.
28. Bias in Nonlinear Estimation10.1111/j.2517-6161.1971.tb00871.x ↗
29. First and second moments of non-linear least-squares estimators10.1007/BF02520475 ↗
30. Lösler, M., Lehmann, R., Neitzel, F., and Eschelbach, C. (2020). Bias in Least-Squares Adjustment of Implicit Functional Models. Surv. Rev., 1–12.10.1080/00396265.2020.1715680 ↗
31. A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators10.1109/9.847726 ↗
32. Carlton, M.A., and Devore, J.L. (2017). Probability with Applications in Engineering, Science, and Technology, Springer Texts in Statistics; Springer International Publishing. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-52401-6 ↗
33. Julier, S.J., and Uhlmann, J.K. (1997, January 21–25). A Consistent, Debiased Method for Converting Between Polar and Cartesian Coordinate Systems. Proceedings of the AeroSense: The 11th International Symposium on Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation and Controls, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.277178 ↗
34. Julier, S.J. (2002, January 8–10). The scaled unscented transformation. Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/ACC.2002.1025369 ↗
35. Julier, S.J., Uhlmann, J.K., and Durrant-Whyte, H.F. (1995, January 21–23). A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems. Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference—ACC’95, Seattle, WA, USA.
36. A Systematization of the Unscented Kalman Filter Theory10.1109/TAC.2015.2404511 ↗
37. Julier, S.J., and Uhlmann, J.K. (2002, January 8–10). Reduced sigma point filters for the propagation of means and covariances through nonlinear transformations. Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/ACC.2002.1023128 ↗
38. Julier, S.J. (2003, January 4–6). The spherical simplex unscented transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, Denver, CO, USA.
39. Simon, D. (2006). Optimal State Estimation–Kalman, H∞, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0470045345 ↗
40. Lösler, M. (2021). Modellbildungen zur Signalweg- und in-situ Referenzpunktbestimmung von VLBI-Radioteleskopen. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, Geodesy and Adjustment Theory].
41. Permanentes Referenzpunkt-Monitoring der TWIN Radioteleskope am Geodätischen Observatorium Wettzell
42. Plag, H.P., and Pearlman, M. (2009). The Future Global Geodetic Observing System. Global Geodetic Observing System—Meeting the Requirements of a Global Society on a Changing Planet in 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-02687-4 ↗
43. Operating Two SLR Systems at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell–From Local Survey to Space Ties10.1007/s00190-019-01243-z ↗
44. Garate, J., Davila, J., Noll, C., and Pearlman, M. SOS-W—A two colour kilohertz SLR system. Proceedings of the 14th International Laser Ranging Workshop, Boletin ROA, Number 5.
45. Hexagon (2021, March 14). AICON DPA Series—Unrivalled High-End Photogrammetry Systems, Datasheet, Available online: https://hexagonmi.com.
46. Evaluation of the geometric stability and the accuracy potential of digital cameras — Comparing mechanical stabilisation versus parameterisation10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.010 ↗
47. Guillory, J., Truong, D., and Wallerand, J.P. (2020). Uncertainty assessment of a prototype of multilateration coordinate measurement system. Precis. Eng.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.08.002 ↗
48. Behrend, D., and Baver, K.D. Simulation of Local Tie Accuracy on VLBI Antennas. Proceedings of the 6th IVS General Meeting 2010—VLBI2010: From Vision to Reality, NASA/CP-2010-215864.
49. Schwegmann, W., and Thorandt, V. The IVS-Reference Point at Onsala—High End Solution for a Real 3D-Determination. Proceedings of the 16th European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry (EVGA) Working Meeting.
50. Reference point determination with a new mathematical model at the 20 m VLBI radio telescope in Wettzell
51. Börlin, N., Murtiyoso, A., and Grussenmeyer, P. (September, January 31). Efficient Computation of Posterior Covariance in Bundle Adjustment in DBAT for Projects with Large Number of Object Points. Proceedings of the XXIV ISPRS Congress, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Virtual Event, Nice, France.
52. JAiCov (2021, March 14). Java Aicon Covariance matrix—Bundle Adjustment for Close-Range Photogrammetry. Available online: https://github.com/applied-geodesy/bundle-adjustment.
53. Schwarz, H.R., and Köckler, N. (2011). Numerische Mathematik, Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, Springer Fachmedien. [8th ed.].10.1007/978-3-8348-8166-3 ↗
54. Ground Survey and Local Ties at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell
55. Automated and continual determination of radio telescope reference points with sub-mm accuracy: Results from a campaign at the Onsala Space Observatory10.1007/s00190-013-0647-y ↗
56. Hypothesis Testing in Non-Linear Models Exemplified by the Planar Coordinate Transformations10.1515/jogs-2018-0009 ↗
57. Koch, K.R. (1999). Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-03976-2 ↗
58. On the sensitivity of the results of least-squares adjustments concerning the stochastic model10.1007/s001900050253 ↗
59. Neitzel, F., Ezhov, N., and Petrovic, S. (2019). Total Least Squares Spline Approximation. Mathematics, 7.10.3390/math7050462 ↗
60. Orthogonale Regression—Realität oder Isotropie?10.1515/teme-2020-0063 ↗
61. Influence of the simplified stochastic model of TLS measurements on geometry-based deformation analysis10.1515/jag-2019-0002 ↗
62. Kermarrec, G., Alkhatib, H., and Neumann, I. (2018). On the Sensitivity of the Parameters of the Intensity-Based Stochastic Model for Terrestrial Laser Scanner. Case Study: B-Spline Approximation. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092964 ↗