journal article·2023-06-28Open access

Optimized Weighted Ensemble Approach for Enhancing Gold Mineralization Prediction

M. M. Zaki, Shaojie Chen, Jicheng Zhang, Fan Feng, Liu Qi, Mohamed A. Mahdy, Linlin Jin

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 13

Abstract

The economic value of a mineral resource is highly dependent on the accuracy of grade estimations. Accurate predictions of mineral grades can help businesses decide whether to invest in a mining project and optimize mining operations to maximize the resource. Conventional methods of predicting gold resources are both costly and time-consuming. However, advances in machine learning and processing power are making it possible for mineral estimation to become more efficient and effective. This work introduces a novel approach for predicting the distribution of mineral grades within a deposit. The approach integrates machine learning and optimization techniques. Specifically, the authors propose an approach that integrates the random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithms with the marine predators optimization algorithm (MPA). The RFKNN_MPA approach uses log normalization to reduce the impact of extreme values and improve the accuracy of the machine learning models. Data segmentation and the MPA algorithm are used to create statistically equivalent subsets of the dataset for use in training and testing. Drill hole locations and rock types are used to create each model. The suggested technique’s performance indices are superior to the others, with a higher R-squared coefficient of 59.7%, a higher R-value of 77%, and lower MSE and RMSE values of 0.17 and 0.44, respectively. The RFKNN_MPA algorithm outperforms geostatistical and conventional machine-learning techniques for estimating mineral orebody grades. The introduced approach offers a novel solution to a problem with practical applications in the mining sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Mining Techniques and Economics · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Mining Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

Mining and Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt

Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Ehteram, M., Khozani, Z.S., Soltani-Mohammadi, S., and Abbaszadeh, M. (2023). The Necessity of Grade Estimation BT—Estimating Ore Grade Using Evolutionary Machine Learning Models, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-19-8106-7 ↗
2. Isaaks, E.H., and Srivastava, R.M. (1989). Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press.
3. Machine Learning Predictive Models for Mineral Prospectivity: An Evaluation of Neural Networks, Random Forest, Regression Trees and Support Vector Machines10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.001 ↗
4. A Review of Soft Computing Technology Applications in Several Mining Problems10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.019 ↗
5. Kanevski, M., Pozdnukhov, A., and Timonin, V. (2009). Machine Learning for Spatial Environmental Data. Theory, Applications and Software, With CD-ROM; EPFL Press.10.1201/9781439808085 ↗
6. A New Approach to Evaluate Organic Geochemistry Parameters by Geostatistical Methods: A Case Study from Western Australia10.1016/j.petrol.2018.05.027 ↗
7. Comparison of Four Machine Learning Algorithms for Spatial Data Analysis
8. Zaki, M.M., Chen, S., Zhang, J., Feng, F., Khoreshok, A.A., Mahdy, M.A., and Salim, K.M. (2022). A Novel Approach for Resource Estimation of Highly Skewed Gold Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12070900 ↗
9. A Comparative Study of the Performance of Single Neural Network vs. Adaboost Algorithm Based Combination of Multiple Neural Networks for Mineral Resource Estimation
10. Machine Learning Algorithms and Their Application to Ore Reserve Estimation of Sparse and Imprecise Data
11. Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks and Kriging for the Prediction of Arsenic in Alaskan Bedrock-Derived Stream Sediments Using Gold Concentration Data10.1080/17480930701259294 ↗
12. Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Copper Ore Grade Estimation10.1007/s10596-018-9758-0 ↗
13. Panagiotou, G.N., and Michalakopoulos, T.N. (1998). Ore Grade Estimation with Modular Neural Network Systems—A Case Study, AA Balkema Publishers.
14. Re-Examination of Itakpe Iron Ore Deposit for Reserve Estimation Using Geostatistics and Artificial Neural Network Techniques10.1007/s12517-020-05644-9 ↗
15. Robust LS-SVM Regression for Ore Grade Estimation in a Seafloor Hydrothermal Sulphide Deposit10.1007/s13131-013-0337-x ↗
16. A Hybrid Method for Grade Estimation Using Genetic Algorithm and Neural Networks10.1007/s10596-008-9107-9 ↗
17. A Hybrid Ensemble Model of Kriging and Neural Network for Ore Grade Estimation10.1080/13895260500322236 ↗
18. A Hybrid Neural Networks-Fuzzy Logic-Genetic Algorithm for Grade Estimation10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.004 ↗
19. Estimation of Geochemical Elements Using a Hybrid Neural Network-Gustafson-Kessel Algorithm
20. Random Forest-Based Prospectivity Modelling of Greenfield Terrains Using Sparse Deposit Data: An Example from the Tanami Region, Western Australia10.1007/s11053-017-9335-6 ↗
21. A Hybrid Simultaneous Perturbation Artificial Bee Colony and Back-Propagation Algorithm for Training a Local Linear Radial Basis Neural Network on Ore Grade Estimation10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.016 ↗
22. Kaplan, U.E., and Topal, E. (2020). A New Ore Grade Estimation Using Combine Machine Learning Algorithms. Minerals, 10.10.3390/min10100847 ↗
23. Samson, M.J. (2019). Mineral Resource Estimates with Machine Learning and Geostatistics. [Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta].
24. jin Hybrid Self-Adaptive Learning Based Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Regression Model for Grade Estimation10.1016/j.neucom.2013.03.002 ↗
25. Marine Predators Algorithm: A Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377 ↗
26. Ben Seghier, M.E.A., Golafshani, E.M., Jafari-Asl, J., and Arashpour, M. Metaheuristic-based Machine Learning Modeling of the Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Waste Glass. Struct. Concr., 2023.10.1002/suco.202200260 ↗
27. Human Activity Recognition Using Marine Predators Algorithm with Deep Learning10.1016/j.future.2023.01.006 ↗
28. Yan, J., Liu, H., Yu, S., Zong, X., and Shan, Y. (2023). Classification of Urban Green Space Types Using Machine Learning Optimized by Marine Predators Algorithm. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15075634 ↗
29. A Special Issue on the Importance of Geostatistics in the Era of Data Science10.1007/s11004-020-09858-1 ↗
30. A Tutorial Guide to Geostatistics: Computing and Modelling Variograms and Kriging10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006 ↗
31. Olea, R.A. (2012). Geostatistics for Engineers and Earth Scientists, Springer Science & Business Media.
32. Geostatistical Analyses and Co-Occurrence Correlations of Heavy Metals Distribution with Various Types of Land Use within a Watershed in Eastern QingHai-Tibet Plateau, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.386 ↗
33. Wackernagel, H. (2003). Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5 ↗
34. Sinclair, A.J., and Blackwell, G.H. (2009). Applied Mineral Inventory Estimation, Cambridge University Press.
35. Introduction to Disjunctive Kriging and Nonlinear Geostatistics10.2307/2291430 ↗
36. Hohn, M. (1998). Geostatistics and Petroleum Geology, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-94-011-4425-4 ↗
37. A Novel Approach to Estimate Proximity in a Random Forest: An Exploratory Study10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.094 ↗
38. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
39. Indoor Localization in a Hospital Environment Using Random Forest Classifiers10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.042 ↗
40. Groundwater Potential Mapping Using Shannon’s Entropy and Random Forest Models in the Bojnourd Township
41. Landslide Susceptibility Estimation by Random Forests Technique: Sensitivity and Scaling Issues10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013 ↗
42. Rokach, L. (2009). Pattern Classification Using Ensemble Methods, World Scientific.10.1142/7238 ↗
43. MacKay, D.J.C. (1997). Gaussian Processes-a Replacement for Supervised Neural Networks?. Semant. Sch., Lecture notes for a tutorial at NIPS.
44. Generalized Regression Neural Networks and Feed Forward Neural Networks for Prediction of Scour Depth around Bridge Piers10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.12.001 ↗
45. Sammut, C., and Webb, G.I. (2017). Decision Tree BT—Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1 ↗
46. Maimon, O., and Rokach, L. (2005). Decision Trees BT—Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer.10.1007/b107408 ↗
47. Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Boosting10.1016/S0169-7161(04)24011-1 ↗
48. Machine Learning Approaches to Rock Fracture Mechanics Problems: Mode-I Fracture Toughness Determination10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107890 ↗
49. A Survey of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Feature Selection to Identify Parkinson’s Disease10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.07.029 ↗
50. Dutta, S. (2006). Predictive Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Ore Reserve Estimation in Sparse and Imprecise Data. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks].
51. Kuhn, M., and Johnson, K. (2013). Applied Predictive Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 ↗
52. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Sandstones Using Petrography-Based Models10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.009 ↗
53. Hamimi, Z., Arai, S., Fowler, A.-R., and El-Bialy, M.Z. (2021). Sukari Gold Mine: Opportunities and Challenges BT—The Geology of the Egyptian Nubian Shield, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-49771-2 ↗
54. (2022, April 05). Available online: https://www.Centamin-Plc-Annual-Report-2022-Web-Ready-Secured.Pdf.
55. Bedair, M., Aref, J., and Bedair, M. (2019). Automating Estimation Parameters: A Case Study Evaluating Preferred Paths for Optimisation, International mining geology Conference.
56. Babakhani, M. (2014). Geostatistical Modeling in Presence of Extreme Values. [Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta].
57. Kim, S.M., Choi, Y., and Park, H.D. (2018). New Outlier Top-Cut Method for Mineral Resource Estimation via 3D Hot Spot Analysis of Borehole Data. Minerals, 8.10.3390/min8080348 ↗
58. Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture (2012). Part 631 Geology National Engineering Handbook—Chapter 4 Engineering Classification of Rock Materials, Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture.
59. Geostatistics in the Presence of Geological Boundaries: Application to Mineral Resources Modeling10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103124 ↗
60. Spatial Statistics and Soil Mapping: A Blossoming Partnership under Pressure10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100639 ↗
61. Lark, R.M., and Minasny, B. (2018). Pedometrics, Springer. Chapter.
62. The Influence of Variogram Parameters on Optimal Sampling Schemes for Mapping by Kriging10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00040-9 ↗
63. Quantitative Kriging Neighbourhood Analysis for the Mining Geologist-a Description of the Method with Worked Case Examples
64. Multivariate Geostatistical Simulation of Coal Quality Data by Independent Components10.1016/j.coal.2012.10.007 ↗
65. Investigating the Impact of Data Normalization on Classification Performance10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524 ↗
66. Neural Network Toolbox
67. On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 ↗
68. Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Experimental Design: A Review10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966228 ↗