journal article·2022-08-04Open access

The Choice of Soybean Cultivar Alters the Underyielding of Protein and Oil under Drought Conditions in Central Poland

Anna Wenda-Piesik, Krystian Ambroziak

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 15

Abstract

The popularization of soybean cultivation in Central Poland is progressing due to the European Soy Declaration signed by 13 member states in Brussels on 17 July 2017. Hence, this research was initiated under the European Innovation Partnership on phenotyping soybean cultivars in two regions, i.e., Kuyavian-Pomeranian and Greater Poland for integrated systems. The aim of this study was to determine soybean potential in the agrotechnical and agroclimatic conditions, with the selection of the most suitable cultivars for tillage and no-tillage cultivation in the region of Central Poland. Strict field research was carried out in six locations from 2018–2020 on 20 cultivars selected in terms of their earliness of maturation to the climatic conditions. On the basis of meteorological data, it was found that half of the plantations suffered from drought stress, as evidenced by the hydrothermal coefficients (K) for the growing season of soybean K < 1.2. The significant multivariate relationship (R = 0.67; p < 0.001) between the hydrothermal coefficient K and the vegetation period days (VPD) as the predictors of the soybean yield was determined by the regression equation Y(yield) = 21.8 + 12.0 X(K) + 0.20 X(VPD). A significant multivariate relationship (R = 0.43; p < 0.01) was also found between the seed yield, hydrothermal coefficient K and the protein content, quantified with the regression equation Y(protein) = 32.6 + 0.25 X(Yield) + 0.28 X(K). In the no-tillage system of cultivation, the seed yield of soybean constantly increased with increasing K (+32.3% between dry/relatively dry and optimal periods, +22.4% between optimal and humid periods), while in the tillage system, the yield increased by 22.1% only when K rose from optimal to humid. In the seasons with optimum and humid conditions, no-tilled soybean produced more oil, in comparison to the season of dry conditions, and the opposite trend was found with the greater oil content in the tillage system. Meanwhile, a higher protein content was observed in the tillage system under humid conditions. All soybean cultivars were grouped according to the cluster analysis (k-means) with ANOVA in terms of vegetation period in days, seed yield, oil, and protein content for tillage and no-tillage cultivation. The study confirmed that soybean might be considered in the future as a profitable crop in Central Poland and create perspective for a low-input source of protein and oil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soybean genetics and cultivation · Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis · Crop Yield and Soil Fertility

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agronomics, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Funding

European Union funds

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Hymowitz, T. (1990). Soybeans: The Success Story. Advances in New Crops, Proceedings of the First National Symposium “New Crops: Research, Development, Economics”, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 23–26 October 1988, Timber Press.
2. Phytoestrogens and Breast Cancer: A Complex Story10.1007/s10787-008-8020-0 ↗
3. (2022, July 06). Statistical Yearbook World Food and Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/cb1329en/online/cb1329en.html.
4. Crops That Feed the World Soybean-Worldwide Production, Use, and Constraints Caused by Pathogens and Pests10.1007/s12571-010-0108-x ↗
5. Soja Przyszłością Polskiego Rolnictwa?
6. Lewandowska, S. (2016, January 5). Perspectives of soybean cultivation in Poland. Proceedings of the Perspectives of Soybean Cultivation in Poland, Krzyżowa, Poland.
7. Alexandratos, N., and Bruinsma, J. (2012). World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision, FAO. ESA Working paper No. 12-03.
8. Genetic and Environmental Effects on Fatty Acid Composition in Soybeans with Potential Use in the Automotive Industry10.2135/cropsci2014.06.0425 ↗
9. Molecular Mapping of Soybean Seed Tocopherols in the Cross ‘OAC Bayfield’ × ‘OAC Shire’10.1111/pbr.12437 ↗
10. (2022, July 06). SOYSTAT. Available online: http://soystats.com/.
11. EC (2018). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Development of Plant Proteins in the European Union, European Commission.
12. Non-gm soybean–production and possible use in animal feeding in Poland. Part, I. Soy in the fodder balance and its cultivation in Poland
13. Liu, K. (1997). Chemistry and Nutritional Value of Soybean Components. Soybeans, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-1763-4_2 ↗
14. Sanders, T.A.B. (2016). Functional Dietary Lipids: Food Formulation, Consumer Issues and Innovation for Health, Woodhead Publishing.
15. (2022, July 06). Polska Soja–Popularyzacja Uprawy Soi Na Terenie Polski. Available online: https://www.polskasoja.pl/asp/pl_start.asp?typ=13&menu=1&strona=1.
16. Wpływ nawożenia dolistnego na plon i skład chemiczny nasion soi (Glycine max (L.) Merrill)
17. Determinanty produkcji roślin strączkowych jako alternatywnego źródła białka-w ramach nowego obszaru polityki rolnej w Polsce10.22630/RNR.2012.99.1.11 ↗
18. Latawiec, A.E., Koryś, A., Koryś, K.A., Kuboń, M., Sadowska, U., Gliniak, M., Sikora, J., Drosik, A., Niemiec, M., and Klimek-Kopyra, A. (2021). Economic Analysis of Biochar Use in Soybean Production in Poland. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11112108 ↗
19. Crop Performance and Soil Conditions on Imperfectly Drained Loams after 20–25 Years of Conventional Tillage or Direct Drilling10.1016/0167-1987(94)90074-4 ↗
20. Interactive Effects of Tillage and Crop Rotations on Yield and Chemical Properties of Soils in Semi-Arid Central Spain10.1016/0167-1987(95)00495-5 ↗
21. Kęsik, T., Blazewicz-Wozniak, M., Konopinski, M., Wach, D., and Mitura, R. (2007). The effect of cover crop mulches and reduced soil tillage in onion cultivation on some features of soil. Rocz. Akad. Rol. Poznaniu. Ogrod., 517–521.
22. Climate Change Impacts on Crop Yield, Crop Water Productivity and Food Security–A Review10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.08.001 ↗
23. Exposure and Transport of Alkaloids and Phytoestrogens from Soybeans to Agricultural Soils and Streams in the Midwestern United States10.1021/acs.est.1c01477 ↗
24. Trends of Changes in Climate Risk of Grain Maize Cultivation in the Bydgoszcz Region
25. The Role of Climate Covariability on Crop Yields in the Conterminous United States10.1038/srep33160 ↗
26. Adaptation Scenarios of Agriculture in Poland to Future Climate Changes10.1023/A:1006378420994 ↗
27. Kozyra, J., Doroszewski, A., and Nieróbca, A. (2017). Climate Change and Its Expected Impact on Agriculture in Poland, IUNG-PIB.
28. Long-term changes of thermal resources in the vegetative period and the active growth of plants in Poland
29. An Intercomparison of Regional Climate Simulations for Europe: Assessing Uncertainties in Model Projections10.1007/s10584-006-9228-x ↗
30. Trends of Minimum and Maximum Temperature in Poland10.3354/cr020123 ↗
31. Rannow, S., and Neubert, M. (2014). Climate Change in Central and Eastern Europe. Managing Protected Areas in Central and Eastern Europe under Climate Change, Springer. Advances in Global Change Research.10.1007/978-94-007-7960-0 ↗
32. Genetic Improvement of U.S. Soybean in Maturity Groups II, III, and IV10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0665 ↗
33. Growth, Yield, and Yield Component Changes among Old and New Soybean Cultivars10.2134/agronj2008.0187 ↗
34. Genetic Improvement Estimates, from Cultivar × Crop Management Trials, Are Larger in High-Yield Cropping Environments10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0609 ↗
35. AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [15th ed.].
36. Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, A., and Kopcińska, J. (2020). Variation in Atmospheric Precipitation in Poland in the Years 2001–2018. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11080794 ↗
37. (2022, July 06). EUR-Lex-C:2016:450:TOC-PL-EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AC%3A2016%3A450%3ATOC.
38. (2022, July 06). Centralny Ośrodek Badania Odmian Roślin Uprawnych, COBORU, Available online: http://www.coboru.gov.pl/.
39. Sudarić, A. (2020). Introductory Chapter. Soybean—Quality and Utilization, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.93942 ↗
40. Agro-economic prospects for expanding soybean production beyond its current northerly limit in Europe10.1016/j.eja.2021.126415 ↗
41. Changes in Soybean Cultivars Released over the Past 50 Years in Southern Brazil10.1038/s41598-021-04043-8 ↗
42. Comparison of the Development and Productivity of Soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merr.) Cultivated in Western Poland
43. Simplifying the Prediction of Phenology with the DSSAT-CROPGRO-Soybean Model Based on Relative Maturity Group and Determinacy10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.016 ↗
44. Serafin-Andrzejewska, M., Helios, W., Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Kozak, M., Kotecki, A., and Kuchar, L. (2021). Effect of sowing date on soybean development in south-western Poland. Agriculture, 11.10.3390/agriculture11050413 ↗
45. Identifying Climatic Risk to Soybean Cultivation in the Transitional Type of Moderate Climate in Central Poland10.5513/JCEA01/20.1.2210 ↗
46. Januszewska-Klapa, K. (2016). Tendencies of Changes in the Climatic Risk of Growing Crops in Selected Locations of the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Province. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Life Science and Technolgy in Bydgoszcz].
47. Consequences of Climate Change for Spatial Organization of Poland
48. Impact of weather and climate on seed protein and oil content of soybean in the North Caucasus10.18699/VJ18.414 ↗
49. Christensen, O.B., Goodess, C.M., Harris, I., and Watkiss, P. (2022, July 06). European and Global Climate Change Projections. Available online: https://www.weadapt.org/knowledge-base/economics-of-adaptation/climatecost-tpbn-1.
50. Soybean Yield in Relation to Environmental and Soil Properties10.1016/j.eja.2020.126070 ↗
51. Identification and Comparative Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in Soybean Leaf Tissue under Drought and Flooding Stress Revealed by RNA-Seq10.3389/fpls.2016.01044 ↗
52. Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants10.3923/ajpp.2010.241.256 ↗
53. Das, A., Rushton, P.J., and Rohila, J.S. (2017). Metabolomic Profiling of Soybeans (Glycine max, L.) Reveals the Importance of Sugar and Nitrogen Metabolism under Drought and Heat Stress. Plants, 6.10.3390/plants6020021 ↗
54. Carbohydrate Storage Enhances Seedling Shade and Stress Tolerance in a Neotropical Forest10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01207.x ↗
55. Ferreira Neto, J.R.C., Pandolfi, V., Guimaraes, F.C.M., Benko-Iseppon, A.M., Romero, C., Silva, R.L.D.O., Rodrigues, F.A., Abdelnoor, R.V., Nepomuceno, A.L., and Kido, E.A. (2013). Early Transcriptional Response of Soybean Contrasting Accessions to Root Dehydration. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0083466 ↗
56. Effect of soybean cultivars sowing dates on seed yield and its correlation with yield parameters10.17221/73/2021-PSE ↗
57. Yielding, oil, fatty acids and protein content in the seeds of polish soybean cultivars under drought conditions
58. Changes in Yield and Agronomic Traits of Soybean Cultivars Released in China in the Last 60 Years10.1071/CP17002 ↗
59. Impact of Heat Stress during Seed Development on Soybean Seed Metabolome10.1007/s11306-015-0941-1 ↗
60. Yield and Economic Effectiveness of Soybean Grown Under Different Cropping Systems10.1007/s42106-020-00098-1 ↗
61. When Does No-till Yield More?10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020 ↗
62. Agronomic Management System and Precipitation Effects on Soybean Oil and Fatty Acid Profiles10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0497 ↗
63. Exploring soybean management options for environments with contrasting water availability10.1111/jac.12321 ↗