journal article·2022-03-24Open access

Methodology to Optimize Quality Costs in Manufacturing Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis and Lean Strategies

Lorena Pérez-Fernández, Miguel A. Sebastián, Cristina González-Gaya

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

Manufacturing quality cost optimization is a priority in any manufacturing sector due to quality issues impacting companies’ reputations and has financial consequences. Quality costs are composed of tangible and intangible costs, however, only tangible costs used to be analyzed because there is no suitable methodology for measuring intangible costs. In this context, an innovative decision support system is developed with an empirical base, applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), and Lean methodology to reduce all quality costs in an efficient way. In quality departments, perceptions, thoughts, and judgments (intangible costs) are not measured and controlled. This study develops an innovative methodology that allows to address this issue in an effective way. Another major innovation is the application of both multi-criteria methodologies to obtain the best combined result for decision making and the optimization of this result, developing an effort–impact matrix based on Lean manufacturing methodology. This system speeds up the decision-making process and assures its efficiency for quality department applications. Moreover, this decision support system may be applicable to any manufacturing sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Quality and Supply Management · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28015 Madrid, Spain

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Eleftheriadis, R., and Myklebust, O. (2016, January 8–10). A guideline of quality steps towards zero defect manufacturing in industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malasya.
2. Product quality improvement policies in Industry 4.0: Characteristics, enabling factors, barriers, and evolution toward Zero Defect Manufacturing. Data-Driven Cognitive Manufacturing-Applications in Predictive Maintenance and Zero Defect Manufacturing10.3389/fcomp.2020.00026 ↗
3. Zero defect manufacturing: State-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research10.1080/00207543.2019.1605228 ↗
4. Monitoring systems for zero defect manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.045 ↗
5. Pérez-Fernández, L., Sebastián, M.A., and González-Gaya, C. (2020, January 7–10). Decision support system to implement quality improvements optimazing tangible and intangible costs in manufacturing. Proceedings of the 25th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering, Alcoi, Spain.
6. Decision support system to decrease warranty and intangible costs in automotive industry10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.176 ↗
7. Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process10.1016/0167-9236(92)90003-8 ↗
8. Baccouche, A., Goren, S., Huyet, A.L., and Pierreval, H. (2011, January 11–15). An approach based on simulation optimization and AHP to support collaborative design: With an application to supply chains. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Production and Logistics Systems (CIPLS), Paris, France.10.1109/CIPLS.2011.5953360 ↗
9. Pereira, J., Fragoso, M., and Todorov, M. (2016). Risk Assessment Using Bayesian Belief Networks and Analytic Hierarchy Process Applicable to Jet Engine High Pressure Turbine Assembly, Department of Systems and Control, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.563 ↗
10. The analytic hierarchy process at Dar AlHekma, Saudi Arabia10.1287/inte.33.4.70.16374 ↗
11. An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine. Technical note
12. Claver, J., García-Dominguez, A., Sevilla, L., and Sebastián, M.A. (2019). A Multi-Criteria Cataloging of the Immovable Items of Industrial Heritage of Andalusia. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9020275 ↗
13. Implementation of AHP Methodology for the Evaluation and Selection Process of a Reverse Engineering Scanning System10.3390/app112412050 ↗
14. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach10.1142/S0218488506004114 ↗
15. Computing a common preference vector in a complex multi-actor and multi-group decision system in Analytic Hierarchy Process context10.1007/s10479-019-03258-3 ↗
16. Applying the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach to convention site selection10.1177/0047287506291593 ↗
17. Applying Lean management to automation
18. A Classification Scheme for the Process Industry to Guide the Implementation of Lean10.1080/10429247.2006.11431690 ↗
19. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., De Sanctis, I., Mazzuto, G., and Paciarotti, C. (2015). A changeover time reduction through an integration of lean practices: A case study from pharmaceutical sector. Assem. Auto.10.1108/AA-05-2014-035 ↗
20. Ballé, M. (2019). The Lean Sensei. Go See Challenge, Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc.
21. Romero, D. (2019, January 1–5). Total Quality Management and Quality Circles in the Digital Lean Manufacturing World. Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Austin, TX, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_1 ↗
22. Kezar, A., and Maxey, D. (2014). The Delphi Technique: An Untapped Approach of Participatory Research, University South California.10.1080/13645579.2014.936737 ↗
23. Propuesta metodológica mediante ANP para la evaluación de las memorias de sostenibilidad del sector agroalimentario español
24. Aznar, J., and Guijarro, F. (2012). Nuevos Métodos de Valoración. Modelos Multicriterio, Universitat Politècnica de València. [2nd ed.].
25. Hurtado, T., and Bruno, G. (2005). El Proceso Analítico Jerárquico (AHP) como Herramienta en la Toma de Decisiones en la Selección de Proveedores: Aplicación en la Selección del Proveedor para la Empresa Gráfica; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas. EAP. Investigación Operativa, MYE S.R.L.