journal article·2021-07-05Open access

Multiparametric Analysis of a Gravity Retaining Wall

Rok Varga, Bojan Žlender, Primož Jelušič

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 13

Abstract

The design of a gravity retaining wall should be simple to construct, quick to build and the best economic solution to a problem. This can be achieved by using advanced optimization methods. Since geotechnical engineers are not always able to determine the exact soil properties and other project data, an optimal design of a gravity retaining wall should also be determined for a wide range of input parameters. Therefore, a multiparametric analysis of an optimal designed gravity retaining wall was carried out. Optimum designs of gravity retaining walls were obtained for 567 combinations of different design parameters. Diagrams were developed to help engineers determine the optimum section of the wall, based on construction costs. An exhaustive search was carried out within the available parameters (project data). The parameters were ranked according to which had the most influence on the optimum cost of the gravity retaining wall and the utilization of multiple constraints. The most important parameter for the optimal cost of a gravity retaining wall is the height of the retained ground, followed by the shear angle of the soil, the soil–wall interaction coefficient, the slope angle and the variable surcharge load. The shear angle of the soil is most relevant to the bearing capacity and eccentricity condition, while the soil–wall interaction coefficient is most relevant to the sliding condition. Since European countries apply different load, material and resistance safety factors, the optimization model was developed in a general form, where different design approaches and unit prices could be applied. The case study provides an improved optimization model for selecting the optimal design of gravity walls, for engineers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS · Horizon 2020 GEOLAB

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. (2021, May 20). EN 1997-1. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design Part 1, General Rules. Available online: https://www.ngm2016.com/uploads/2/1/7/9/21790806/eurocode_7_-_geotechnical_designen.1997.1.2004.pdf.
2. Brady, K.C., O’Reilly, M., Bevc, L., Žnidarič, A., O’Brien, E., and Jordan, R. (2021, May 25). COST 345. Working Group 1. Report on the Current Stock of Highway Structures in European Countries, the Cost of Their Replacement and the Annual Costs of Maintaining, Repairing and Renewing Them. Available online: http://cost345.zag.si/Reports/COST_345_WG1.pdf.
3. Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Walls Utilizing Eleven Meta-Heuristic Algorithms: A Comparative Study
4. CBO and DPSO for optimum design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls
5. Charged System Search Algorithm for the Optimum Cost Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Walls10.1007/s13369-012-0332-0 ↗
6. Konstandakopoulou, F., Tsimirika, M., Pnevmatikos, N., and Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2020). Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls Designed According to European Provisions. Infrastructures, 5.10.3390/infrastructures5060046 ↗
7. Optimization and Sensitivity of Retaining Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:8(649) ↗
8. Economic design of retaining wall using particle swarm optimization with passive congregation
9. Design of Retaining Walls Using Big Bang–Big Crunch Optimization10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000461 ↗
10. Moayyeri, N., Gharehbaghi, S., and Plevris, V. (2019). Cost-Based Optimum Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls Considering Different Methods of Bearing Capacity Computation. Mathematics, 7.10.3390/math7121232 ↗
11. Optimal design of cantilever retaining wall using differential evolution algorithm
12. Optimum Design of Gravity Retaining Walls Using Charged System Search Algorithm10.1155/2012/301628 ↗
13. Design optimization for symmetrical gravity retaining walls
14. Zhuang, J., and Chen, J. (2021). Stability Analysis of Gravity Retaining Walls with Different Wall-back Types under Equal Section Area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Innovative Solutions in Hydropower and Environmental and Civil Engineering, Beijing, China, 11–13 December 2020, IOP Publishing.
15. Parameters Optimization of Geotechnical Problem Using Different Optimization Algorithm10.1007/s10706-015-9898-0 ↗
16. A multi-parameter optimization technique for prestressed concrete cable-stayed bridges considering prestress in girder
17. Rumpf, M., Grohmann, M., Eisenbach, P., and Hauser, S. (2015, January 17–20). Structural Surface—Multi parameter structural optimization of a thin high performance concrete object. Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
18. Optimal design of timber-concrete composite floors based on the multi-parametric MINLP optimization10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.062 ↗
19. Multi-parametric MINLP optimization study of a composite I beam floor system10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.012 ↗
20. Chen, C., Mao, F., Zhang, G., Huang, J., Zornberg, J., Liang, X., and Chen, J. (2021). Settlement-Based Cost Optimization of Geogrid-Reinforced Pile-Supported Foundation. Geosynth. Int., 1–39. online ahead of print.10.1680/jgein.21.00002 ↗
21. Optimal design of piled embankments with basal reinforcement10.1680/jgein.17.00039 ↗
22. Parametric study for optimal design of large piled raft foundations on sand10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.014 ↗
23. Theoretical Study on Pile Length Optimization of Pile Groups and Piled Rafts10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000206 ↗
24. Determining optimal designs for conventional and geothermal energy piles10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.016 ↗
25. A case study of the sizing and optimisation of an energy pile foundation (Rosborg, Denmark)10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.100 ↗
26. Optimal Design of Reinforced Pad Foundation and Strip Foundation10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001258 ↗
27. Economic Design Optimization of Foundations10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1097) ↗
28. Determining optimal designs for geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments10.1007/s00500-019-04127-8 ↗
29. Balasbaneh, A.T., Yeoh, D., Juki, M.I., Ibrahim, M.H.W., and Abidin, A.R.Z. (2021). Assessing the life cycle study of alternative earth-retaining walls from an environmental and economic viewpoint. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., in press.10.1007/s11356-021-13190-4 ↗
30. Sustainability assessment of earth-retaining wall structures10.1680/jenge.16.00004 ↗
31. Giri, R.K., and Reddy, K.R. Sustainability Assessment of Two Alternate Earth-Retaining Structures. Proceedings of the IFCEE 2015.10.1061/9780784479087.265 ↗
32. A real coded genetic algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems
33. Kalasin, T., and Wood, D.M. (2008, January 12–17). Seismic analysis of retaining walls within plasticity framework. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
34. Wood, D.M., and Kalasin, T. (2004, January 31). Macroelement for study of dynamic response of gravity retaining walls. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyclic Behaviour of Soils and Liquefaction Phenomena, Bochum, Germany.
35. Seismic Behavior of Gravity Retaining Walls10.1061/41095(365)229 ↗