Static and Dynamic Response of Micropiles Used for Reinforcing Slopes
Source abstract
Abstract
To study the static and dynamic response of micropile-reinforced slopes, static model tests and shaking table tests were performed. The failure modes, the pile-slope interaction, the displacement, and the static/dynamic earth pressure distributions were analyzed based on static and dynamic model tests with a prescribed sliding surface. The test results indicated: (1) The micropile failure mode is mainly bending failure under both loading conditions. As far as the damage to the pile body is concerned, under static loading, the rear row piles showed more damage than the middle row piles followed by the front row piles. Under dynamic loading, the damage of the rear row piles was approximately the same as the middle row piles, which was greater than the front row piles; (2) The earth pressures in front of and behind each row of micropiles and the axial force of the pile body distributed triangularly for both loading conditions, with the bending moment of the pile body distributed in an “S” shape; (3) The landslide thrust experienced by the micropiles has a relatively large group effect. The group effect or shear ratio parameters are recommended for each loading case; (4) The interaction between the micropiles and the soil landslide presents evident progressive failure and load transfer between the rows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, 126 Yanta Road, Xi’an 710054, China
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, 813 Bissell Road, Ames, IA 50011-1066, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Dynamic Characteristics of High-Elevation and Long-Runout Landslides in the Emeishan Basalt Area: A Case Study of the Shuicheng ‘7.23′ Landslide in Guizhou, China10.1007/s10346-020-01377-8 ↗
2. Characterizing the catastrophic 2017 Mud Creek landslide, California, using repeat structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry10.1007/s10346-019-01160-4 ↗
3. The characteristics and mechanisms of the recent catastrophic landslides in Africa under IPL and WCoE projects10.1007/s10346-018-1064-3 ↗
4. Dynamics of the 2008 earthquake-triggered Wenjiagou Creek rock avalanche, Qingping, Sichuan, China10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.008 ↗
5. Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on the Occurrence Mechanism of Landslide: A Case Study in Yuan’an County, China10.1007/s12665-021-09381-4 ↗
6. Wallemacq, P., Below, R., and McLean, D. (2018). Economic Losses, Poverty and Disasters 1998–2017, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) Publications.
7. Experimental and Calculation Analysis of Slope Protection by Collaborated Micropiles and Vetiver
8. Performance of driven grouted micropiles: Full-scale field study10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001905 ↗
9. Men, Y.M., and Yan, J.K. (2011). Research Report on Large-Scale Physical Model test of Landslide Micro-Pile Prevention Technology, Chang’an University.
10. Experimental study on reinforcement of landslide micro-pile group
11. Wang, S.F. (2010). Research on the Micro-Pile Prevention and Control Project of Wenchuan Earthquake Landslide, Chang’an University.
12. Turner, J.P., and Mayne, P.W. (2004). Lateral loads on pin piles (micropiles). Geo-Support 2004: Drilled Shafis, Micropile, Deep Mixing, Remedial Methods, and Specialty Foundation Systems, Geotechnical Special Publication 124, ASCE.
13. Andrew, Z.B. (2006). Load Transfer in Micropiles for Slope Stabilization from Test of Large-Scale Physical Models. D, University of Missouri-Columbia.
14. Bruce, D.A., Caden, A.W., and Sabain, P.J. (2005). Practical Advice for Foundation Desig-micropiles or structural Support[C]//ASCE. Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2005 Congress, ASCE.10.1061/40777(156)14 ↗
15. 3-D predictions of installation and group effect on driven piles in sands10.1179/1939787914Y.0000000052 ↗
16. Investigation of geomorphic and seismic effects on the 1959 Madison canyon, Montana, landslide using an integrated field, engineering geomorphology mapping, and numerical modelling approach10.1007/s00603-015-0889-5 ↗
17. Imrovement of loose sandy soil deposits using micropiles10.1007/s12205-012-1390-2 ↗
18. Shaking table investigation of effects of inclination angle on seismic performance of micropiles10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001236 ↗
19. Field Tests on micropiles under dynamic lateral loading10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.435 ↗
20. Rollins, K.M., Johnson, S.R., Petersen, K.T., and Weaver, T.J. (2003, January 25). Static and dynamic lateral load behavior of pile groups based on full-scale testing. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Offshore and Polar Drilling, Honolulu, HI, USA.
21. Experimental study on the influence of frequency on micro-pile-soil dynamic interaction
22. Niu, W.Q. (2016). Experimental Study on Seismic Dynamic Characteristics of Micro-Pile Retaining Structure, China Academy of Railway Sciences.
23. Centrifuge modeling of soil-pile interaction in liquefiable soils subjected to strong motion
24. New type geo-mechanical similar material experiments research and its application10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.326-328.1801 ↗
25. Fan, Q.S., and Zhu, Z.C. (1981). Handbook of Material Mechanics, China Construction Industry Press.