A Wearable System for the Estimation of Performance-Related Metrics during Running and Jumping Tasks
Source abstract
Abstract
Athletic performance, technique assessment, and injury prevention are all important aspects in sports for both professional and amateur athletes. Wearable technology is attracting the research community’s interest because of its capability to provide real-time biofeedback to coaches and athletes when on the field and outside of more restrictive laboratory conditions. In this paper, a novel wearable motion sensor-based system has been designed and developed for athletic performance assessment during running and jumping tasks. The system consists of a number of components involving embedded systems (hardware and software), back-end analytics, information and communications technology (ICT) platforms, and a graphical user interface for data visualization by the coach. The system is able to provide automatic activity recognition, estimation of running and jumping metrics, as well as vertical ground reaction force (GRF) predictions, with sufficient accuracy to provide valuable information as regards training outcomes. The developed system is low-power, sufficiently small for real-world scenarios, easy to use, and achieves the specified communication range. The system’s high sampling rate, levels of accuracy and performance enables it as a performance evaluation tool able to support coaches and athletes in their real-world practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · Sports injuries and prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Lee Maltings Complex, Dyke Parade, T12R5CP Cork, Ireland
Setanta College, Thurles Enterprise Centre, Thurles, Co., Jimmy Doyle Rd, E41AP65 Tipperary, Ireland
Funding
Enterprise Ireland · Setanta College Ltd · Science Foundation Ireland
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Modern Techniques and Technologies Applied to Training and Performance Monitoring10.1123/ijspp.2016-0405 ↗
2. Developing athlete monitoring systems in team-sports: Data analysis and visualization10.1123/ijspp.2018-0169 ↗
3. Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete10.1038/s41746-019-0149-2 ↗
4. Use of wearable technology for performance assessment: A validation study10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.03.017 ↗
5. Adesida, Y., Papi, E., and McGregor, A.H. (2019). Exploring the Role of Wearable Technology in Sport Kinematics and Kinetics: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19071597 ↗
6. Camomilla, V., Bergamini, E., Fantozzi, S., and Vannozzi, G. (2018). Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18030873 ↗
7. Park, J., Na, Y., Gu, G., and Kim, J. (2016, January 26–29). Flexible insole ground reaction force measurement shoes for jumping and running. Proceedings of the 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Singapore.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523772 ↗
8. Innovations and pitfalls in the use of wearable devices in the prevention and rehabilitation of running related injuries10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.10.003 ↗
9. Test-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Athletic Performance Combine Tests in 6–15-Year-Old Male Athletes10.1519/JSC.0000000000002498 ↗
10. Association Between the Force–Velocity Profile and Performance Variables Obtained in Jumping and Sprinting in Elite Female Soccer Players10.1123/ijspp.2018-0233 ↗
11. Effects of in-Season Short-Term Plyometric Training Program on Leg Power, Jump- and Sprint Performance of Soccer Players10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e2728f ↗
12. (2020, August 02). Xybermind. Available online: http://xybermind.de/achillex/achillex-jumpnrun/.
13. Classification of team sport activities using a single wearable tracking device10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.015 ↗
14. Using accelerations of single inertial measurement units to determine the intensity level of light-moderate-vigorous physical activities: Technical and mathematical considerations10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109834 ↗
15. Integration of Wearable Sensors Into the Evaluation of Running Economy and Foot Mechanics in Elite Runners10.1249/JSR.0000000000000550 ↗
16. Altering cadence or vertical oscillation during running: Effects on running related injury factors10.26603/ijspt20180633 ↗
17. Validation of a Wearable Sensor for Measuring Running Biomechanics10.1159/000491645 ↗
18. Ancillao, A., Tedesco, S., Barton, J., and O’Flynn, B. (2018). Indirect measurement of ground reaction forces and moments by means of wearable inertial sen-sors: A systematic review. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082564 ↗
19. Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces and Sagittal Knee Kinematics During Running Using Three Inertial Sensors10.3389/fphys.2018.00218 ↗
20. Estimation of vertical ground reaction force during running using neural network model and uniaxial accelerometer10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.06.006 ↗
21. A neural network method to predict task- and step-specific ground reaction force magnitudes from trunk accelerations during running activities10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.02.002 ↗
22. Multidimensional Ground Reaction Forces and Moments From Wearable Sensor Accelerations via Deep Learning10.1109/TBME.2020.3006158 ↗
23. Predicting three-dimensional ground reaction forces in running by using artificial neural networks and lower body kinematics10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949699 ↗
24. Tedesco, S., Perez-Valero, E., Komaris, D.-S., Jordan, L., Barton, J., Hennessy, L., and O’Flynn, B. (2020, January 25–28). Wearable Motion Sensors and Artificial Neural Network for the Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces in Running. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE SENSORS, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278796 ↗
25. Komaris, D.-S., Perez-Valero, E., Jordan, L., Barton, J., Hennessy, L., O’Flynn, B., and Tedesco, S. (2020, January 21–25). A Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Vertical Ground Reaction Forces in Running. Proceedings of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports Proceedings (ISBS 2020), Online.
26. Countermovement jump performance assessment using a wearable 3D inertial measurement unit10.1080/02640414.2010.523089 ↗
27. A wearable system to assess risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury during jump landing: Measurements of temporal events, jump height, and sagittal plane kinematics10.1115/1.4004413 ↗
28. Vertical jump height estimation algorithm based on takeoff and landing identification via foot-worn inertial sensing10.1115/1.4038740 ↗
29. Assessment of walking, running, and jumping movement features by using the inertial measurement unit10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.007 ↗
30. (2020, August 01). STMicroelectronics. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f417ig.html.
31. (2020, August 01). InvenSense. Available online: https://invensense.tdk.com/download-pdf/mpu-9250-datasheet/.
32. (2020, August 01). Nordic. Available online: https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-wireless/Bluetooth-5.
33. (2020, August 01). Abracon. Available online: https://abracon.com/datasheets/ACAG0801-2450-T.pdf.
34. Reliability of performance measurements derived from ground reaction force data during countermovement jump and the influence of sampling frequency10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00ca2 ↗
35. Coviello, G., Avitabile, G., and Florio, A. (2020). A Synchronized Multi-Unit Wireless Platform for Long-Term Activity Monitoring. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9071118 ↗
36. Detection of (In)activity Periods in Human Body Motion Using Inertial Sensors: A Comparative Study10.3390/s120505791 ↗
37. Gyroscope-based assessment of temporal gait parameters during treadmill walking and running10.1007/s12283-012-0093-8 ↗
38. Using ground reaction force to predict knee kinetic asymmetry following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction10.1111/sms.12118 ↗
39. Inertial sensors-based lower-limb rehabilitation assessment: A comprehensive evaluation of gait, kinematic and statistical metrics
40. Monitoring Kinematic Changes With Fatigue in Running Using Body-Worn Sensors10.1109/TITB.2012.2201950 ↗
41. Power-Time, Force-Time, and Velocity-Time Curve Analysis of the Countermovement Jump: Impact of Training10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181889324 ↗
42. Three Different Methods of Calculating Vertical Jump Height from Force Platform Data in Men and Women10.1080/10913670802349766 ↗
43. (2020, August 01). Loadsol. Available online: https://www.novel.de/products/loadsol/.
44. (2020, August 01). BTSBioengineering. Available online: https://www.btsbioengineering.com/products/podium/.
45. Accuracy and precision of loadsol®® insole force-sensors for the quantification of ground reaction force-based biomechanical running parameters10.1080/17461391.2018.1477993 ↗
46. Renner, K.E., Williams, D.B., and Queen, R.M. (2019). The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol®® under Various Walking and Running Conditions. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19020265 ↗
47. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort10.2196/13084 ↗
48. (2016, December 01). New CTS Standards for IoT Advance Functionality of Tech Monitoring of Consumer Health. Available online: https://www.cta.tech/News/Press-Releases/2016/October/New-CTA-Standards-for-IoTAdvance-Functionality-of.aspx.
49. Heishman, A., Daub, B., Miller, R., Brown, B., Freitas, E., and Bemben, M. (2019). Countermovement Jump Inter-Limb Asymmetries in Collegiate Basketball Players. Sports, 7.10.3390/sports7050103 ↗
50. Reliability of Measures Obtained During Single and Repeated Countermovement Jumps10.1123/ijspp.3.2.131 ↗
51. Winter, D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Wiley. [4th ed.].10.1002/9780470549148 ↗
52. (2020, December 24). MarketResearch. Available online: https://www.marketresearch.com/Mordor-Intelligence-LLP-v4018/Global-Wearable-Devices-Sports-Segmented-11643506/.
53. (2020, December 24). FootPod Garmin. Available online: https://buy.garmin.com/en-ER/ssa/p/15516.
54. (2020, December 24). Stride Sensor Polar. Available online: https://www.polar.com/en/products/accessories/stride_sensor_bluetooth_smart.
55. (2020, December 24). Axiamo XRUN. Available online: http://www.axiamo.com/xrun/.
56. (2020, December 24). RunScribe. Available online: https://runscribe.com/.
57. (2020, December 24). RunTeq. Available online: http://www.runteq.com/.
58. (2020, August 02). GaitUp. Available online: https://gaitup.com/.
59. (2020, December 24). SHFT. Available online: http://shft.run/.
60. (2020, December 24). Moov. Available online: https://welcome.moov.cc/.
61. (2020, December 24). Tg Force. Available online: https://tgforce.com/.
62. (2020, August 02). Stryd. Available online: https://www.stryd.com/.
63. (2020, August 02). IMeasureU. Available online: https://imeasureu.com/.
64. (2020, August 02). ViPerform. Available online: https://www.dorsavi.com/us/en/viperform/.
65. (2020, December 24). MyVert. Available online: https://www.myvert.com/.
66. (2021, May 29). K-50. Available online: https://www.k-sport.tech/en-index.html.
67. ACL injuries in men’s professional football: A 15-year prospective study on time trends and return-to-play rates reveals only 65% of players still play at the top level 3 years after ACL rupture10.1136/bjsports-2015-095952 ↗
68. Predicting Sports Injuries with Wearable Technology and Data Analysis
69. Smart Insole: A Wearable Sensor Device for Unobtrusive Gait Monitoring in Daily Life10.1109/TII.2016.2585643 ↗
70. Estimating CoP Trajectories and Kinematic Gait Parameters in Walking and Running Using Instrumented Insoles10.1109/LRA.2017.2721550 ↗
71. A review in detection and monitoring gait disorders using in-shoe plantar measurement systems10.1109/RBME.2017.2747402 ↗
72. Matijevich, E.S., Branscombe, L.M., Scott, L.R., and Zelik, K.E. (2019). Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0210000 ↗
73. Zhuang, Z., and Xue, Y. (2019). Sport-Related Human Activity Detection and Recognition Using a Smartwatch. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19225001 ↗
74. Scheurer, S., Tedesco, S., Brown, K.N., and O’Flynn, B. (2017, January 9–12). Human Activity Recognition for Emergency First Responders via Body-Worn Inertial Sensors. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2017), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1109/BSN.2017.7935994 ↗
75. Scheurer, S., Tedesco, S., Brown, K.N., and O’Flynn, B. (2020). Using domain knowledge for interpretable and competitive multi-class human activity recognition. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20041208 ↗
76. Worsey, M.T.O., Espinosa, H.G., Shepherd, J.B., Lewerenz, J., Klodzinski, F.S.M., and Thiel, D.V. (2020, January 22–26). Features Observed Using Multiple Inertial Sensors for Running Track and Hard-Soft Sand Running: A Comparison Study. Proceedings of the ISEA 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (2020), Online.10.3390/proceedings2020049012 ↗
77. Node Position Effect on Link Reliability for Body Centric Wireless Network Running Applications10.1109/JSEN.2014.2314477 ↗
78. Red, Amber, or Green? Athlete Monitoring in Team Sport: The Need for Decision-Support Systems10.1123/ijspp.2016-0541 ↗