journal article·2021-03-15Open access

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Upper Limb Proprioception via a Wearable Exoskeleton

Elisa Galofaro, Erika D’Antonio, Fabrizio Patané, Maura Casadio, Lorenzo Masia

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

Proprioception—the sense of body segment’s position and movement—plays a crucial role in human motor control, integrating the sensory information necessary for the correct execution of daily life activities. Despite scientific evidence recognizes that several neurological diseases hamper proprioceptive encoding with consequent inability to correctly perform movements, proprioceptive assessment in clinical settings is still limited to standard scales. Literature on physiology of upper limb’s proprioception is mainly focused on experimental approaches involving planar setups, while the present work provides a novel paradigm for assessing proprioception during single—and multi-joint matching tasks in a three-dimensional workspace. To such extent, a six-degrees of freedom exoskeleton, ALEx-RS (Arm Light Exoskeleton Rehab Station), was used to evaluate 18 healthy subjects’ abilities in matching proprioceptive targets during combined single and multi-joint arm’s movements: shoulder abduction/adduction, shoulder flexion/extension, and elbow flexion/extension. Results provided evidence that proprioceptive abilities depend on the number of joints simultaneously involved in the task and on their anatomical location, since muscle spindles work along their preferred direction, modulating the streaming of sensory information accordingly. These findings suggest solutions for clinical sensorimotor evaluation after neurological disease, where assessing proprioceptive deficits can improve the recovery path and complement the rehabilitation outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Assistive Robotics and Interactive Exosuits (ARIES) Lab, Institute of Computer Engineering (ZITI), University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and System Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy

Mechanical Measurements and Microelectronics (M3Lab) Lab, Engineering Department, University Niccolò Cusano, 00166 Rome, Italy

Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), 5230 Odense, Denmark

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Kinesthetic sensibility10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.763 ↗
2. The sensorimotor system, part II: The role of proprioception in motor control and functional joint stability
3. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 ↗
4. Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, Human Kinetics Publishers. [2nd ed.].
5. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 ↗
6. Robotic assessment of sensorimotor deficits after traumatic brain injury10.1097/NPT.0b013e318254bd4f ↗
7. Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: Assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton10.1186/s12984-019-0618-5 ↗
8. Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: A systematic review10.1177/0269215508098897 ↗
9. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: From basic science to general practice10.2522/ptj.20090399 ↗
10. Proprioception and motor performance after stroke: An examination of diffusion properties in sensory and motor pathways10.1002/hbm.24574 ↗
11. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties10.1177/154596802401105171 ↗
12. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-X ↗
13. The unreliability of sensory assessments10.1177/026921559100500403 ↗
14. Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: A systematic review10.1177/0269215511412982 ↗
15. Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks10.1152/jn.00494.2009 ↗
16. Wilson, E.T., Wong, J., and Gribble, P.L. (2010). Mapping proprioception across a 2D horizontal workspace. PLoS ONE, 5.10.1371/annotation/5452a5f9-9d97-4be3-a4ca-bca4122b10fc ↗
17. Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00011-4 ↗
18. A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception10.1186/s12984-017-0329-8 ↗
19. The Arm Movement Detection (AMD) test: A fast robotic test of proprioceptive acuity in the arm10.1186/s12984-017-0269-3 ↗
20. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke10.1177/1545968309345267 ↗
21. The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke10.1186/1743-0003-9-72 ↗
22. Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: I. Muscle spindle feedback during spatially oriented movements10.1007/s002210000471 ↗
23. Directional tuning of human forearm muscle afferents during voluntary wrist movements10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0635c.xd ↗
24. Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: II. Muscle-spindle feedback during” drawing-like” movements10.1007/s002210000472 ↗
25. Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements10.1016/j.neulet.2007.07.034 ↗
26. Berret, B., Darlot, C., Jean, F., Pozzo, T., Papaxanthis, C., and Gauthier, J.P. (2008). The inactivation principle: Mathematical solutions minimizing the absolute work and biological implications for the planning of arm movements. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000194 ↗
27. Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed10.1007/s00221-002-1327-y ↗
28. Sketch, S.M., Bastian, A.J., and Okamura, A.M. (2018, January 25–28). Comparing proprioceptive acuity in the arm between joint space and task space. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), Francis, CA, USA.10.1109/HAPTICS.2018.8357164 ↗
29. Marini, F., Squeri, V., Morasso, P., Konczak, J., and Masia, L. (2016). Robot-aided mapping of wrist proprioceptive acuity across a 3D workspace. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0161155 ↗
30. Perception of arm position in three-dimensional space10.3389/fnhum.2018.00331 ↗
31. Valdés, B.A., Khoshnam, M., Neva, J.L., and Menon, C. (2019, January 24–28). Robot-Aided Upper-limb Proprioceptive Training in Three-Dimensional Space. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779529 ↗
32. Robotics-assisted visual-motor training influences arm position sense in three-dimensional space
33. Robotic Assessment of Wrist Proprioception During Kinaesthetic Perturbations: A Neuroergonomic Approach
34. Blumenschein, L.H., McDonald, C.G., and O’Malley, M.K. (June, January 29). A cable-based series elastic actuator with conduit sensor for wearable exoskeletons. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Singapore.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989790 ↗
35. Sui, D., Fan, J., Jin, H., Cai, X., Zhao, J., and Zhu, Y. (2017, January 3–7). Design of a wearable upper-limb exoskeleton for activities assistance of daily living. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Munich, Germany.
36. Fitle, K.D., Pehlivan, A.U., and O’Malley, M.K. (2015, January 26–30). A robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment of the upper limb following incomplete spinal cord injury. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139888 ↗
37. Developments and clinical evaluations of robotic exoskeleton technology for human upper-limb rehabilitation10.1080/01691864.2020.1749926 ↗
38. Evaluation of the effects of the Arm Light Exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: A pilot study on healthy subjects10.1186/s12984-016-0117-x ↗
39. Frisoli, A. (2018). Exoskeletons for upper limb rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Robotics, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-811995-2.00006-0 ↗
40. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 97–113.10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 ↗
41. Galofaro, E., Ballardini, G., Boggini, S., Foti, F., Nisky, I., and Casadio, M. (2019, January 24–28). Assessment of bimanual proprioception during an orientation matching task with a physically coupled object. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779415 ↗
42. Rincon-Gonzalez, L., Buneo, C.A., and Tillery, S.I.H. (2011). The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0025214 ↗
43. Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription10.1249/01.MSS.0000121945.36635.61 ↗
44. Schwellnus, M.P. (2009). The Olympic Textbook of Medicine in Sport, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781444300635 ↗
45. Peri-personal space as a prior in coupling visual and proprioceptive signals10.1038/s41598-018-33961-3 ↗
46. Carry-over coarticulation in joint angles10.1007/s00221-015-4327-4 ↗
47. Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey10.1093/brain/96.4.653 ↗
48. Proprioceptive bimanual test in intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates10.3389/fnhum.2015.00072 ↗
49. Position sense asymmetry10.1007/s00221-008-1560-0 ↗
50. Variation in shoulder position sense at mid and extreme range of motion10.1053/apmr.2001.21865 ↗
51. A comparison of individual joint contributions to multijoint position reproduction acuity in overhead-throwing athletes10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.015 ↗
52. A robot-aided visuomotor wrist training induces gains in proprioceptive and movement accuracy in the contralateral wrist10.1038/s41598-021-84767-9 ↗
53. A robot-aided visuo-motor training that improves proprioception and spatial accuracy of untrained movement10.1038/s41598-017-16704-8 ↗