journal article·2020-07-27Open access

The Efficiency of Social Network Services Management in Organizations. An In-Depth Analysis Applying Machine Learning Algorithms and Multiple Linear Regressions

Luis Matosas-López, Alberto Romero-Ania

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 15

Abstract

The objective of this work is to detect the variables that allow organizations to manage their social network services efficiently. The study, applying machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regressions, reveals which aspects of published content increase the recognition of publications through retweets and favorites. The authors examine (I) the characteristics of the content (publication volumes, publication components, and publication moments) and (II) the message of the content (publication topics). The research considers 21,771 publications and thirty-nine variables. The results show that the recognition obtained through retweets and favorites is conditioned both by the characteristics of the content and by the message of the content. The recognition through retweets improves when the organization uses links, hashtags, and topics related to gender equality, whereas the recognition through favorites increases when the organization uses original tweets, publications between 8:00 and 10:00 a.m. and, again, gender equality related topics. The findings of this research provide new knowledge about trends and patterns of use in social media, providing academics and professionals with the necessary guidelines to efficiently manage these technologies in the organizational field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Marketing and Social Media · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Social Media and Politics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Financial Economics, Accounting and Modern Language, Rey Juan Carlos University, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28032 Madrid, Spain

Department of Applied Economics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28032 Madrid, Spain

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Hootsuite & We Are Social, and Kemp, S. (2020, May 01). Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview; Singapore. Available online: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-singapore?rq=singapore.
2. Gómez-García, M., Matosas-López, L., and Palmero-Ruiz, J. (2020). Social Networks Use Patterns among University Youth: The Validity and Reliability of an Updated Measurement Instrument. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093503 ↗
3. Nuevas audiencias, nuevas responsabilidades. La competencia mediática en la era de la convergencia digital
4. De cara al prosumidor: Producción y consumo empoderando a la ciudadanía 3.0
5. Uses and Gratifications Research10.1086/268109 ↗
6. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02 ↗
7. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 ↗
8. Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011 ↗
9. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023 ↗
10. ¿Por qué los y las jóvenes están en las redes sociales? Un análisis de sus motivaciones a partir de la teoría de usos y gratificaciones
11. Análisis bibliométrico de estudios sobre la estrategia de contenidos de marca en los medios sociales
12. ¿Por qué las instituciones de educación superior deben apostar por la marca?10.6018/rie.37.1.291191 ↗
13. Metric proposal for customer engagement in Facebook
14. Matosas-López, L. (2020, January 20–21). Cómo distintos tipos de organización gestionan su presencia en plataformas sociales. Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Knowledge, Culture, and Change in Organizations, Chicago, IL, USA.
15. Balan, C. (2017, January 22–24). Nike on Instagram: Themes of branded content and their engagement power. Proceedings of the CBU International Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.10.12955/cbup.v5.894 ↗
16. Variables of twitter´s brand activity that influence audience spreading behavior of branded content
17. Customer engagement behaviours in social media: Capturing innovation opportunities10.1108/JSM-02-2017-0059 ↗
18. Social networking sites and customers’ attitude towards advertisements
19. Brand engagement in self-concept and consumer engagement in social media: The role of the source10.1002/mar.21312 ↗
20. Do tweets create value? A multi-period analysis of Twitter use and content of tweets for manufacturing firms10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.008 ↗
21. Laudano, C.N., Planas, J., and Kessler, M.I. (2016). Aproximacones a los usos de twitter en bibliotecas universitarias de Argentina. An. Doc., 19.10.6018/analesdoc.19.2.246291 ↗
22. Comunicación de la ciencia y la tecnología en las universidades ecuatorianas: Estudio preliminar del impacto y percepción entre la población universitaria
23. Acciones y estrategias de comunicación en plataformas digitales. El caso Cifuentes
24. Comunicación pública de la ciencia a través de la web 2.0. El caso de los centros de investigación y universidades públicas de España10.3145/epi.2016.may.14 ↗
25. What to say on social media and how: Effects of communication style and function on online customer engagement in China10.1108/JSTP-11-2018-0243 ↗
26. Institutional Uses of Twitter in U.S. Higher Education10.1007/s10755-016-9375-6 ↗
27. El uso de redes sociales por parte de las universidades a nivel institucional. Un estudio comparativo
28. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8 ↗
29. Big Data—The information revolution
30. Predicting academic performance based on students’ family environment: Evidence for Colombia using classification trees10.25115/psye.v11i3.2056 ↗
31. Sanchez, A.M.d.V.D.J.S. (2019). Divergencias en el uso de redes sociales en universitarios de los grados de Economía y Marketing. Aproximación Periodística y Educomunicativa al Fenómeno de las Redes Sociales, McGraw Hill.
32. Comparing a traditional approach for financial brand communication analysis with a big data analytics technique10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905301 ↗
33. Propuesta metodológica para la aplicación del benchmarking internacional en la evaluación de la calidad de la educación superior virtual10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2163 ↗
34. Las redes sociales en la gestión de la comunicación universitaria
35. Mapping Social Media Texts as the Basis of Place-Making Process10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.052 ↗
36. Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: Metrics for tweeting activities10.1080/13645579.2012.756095 ↗
37. Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003 ↗
38. Asociación entre el momento de publicación en las redes sociales y el engagement: Estudio de las universidades Mexicanas10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.8 ↗
39. Universidad y medios sociales. Gestión de la comunicación en la universidad española
40. Thai, M.T., Wu, W., and Xiong, H. (2016). Big Data in Complex and Social Networks, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.10.1201/9781315396705 ↗
41. Twitter analytics: A big data management perspective10.1145/2674026.2674029 ↗
42. Kumar, S., Morstatter, F., and Liu, H. (2013). Twitter Data Analytics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-9372-3 ↗
43. Scaling Big Data Mining Infrastructure: The Twitter Experience10.1145/2481244.2481247 ↗
44. Visual Twitter Analytics (Vista): Temporally changing sentiment and the discovery of emergent themes within sport event tweets10.1108/OIR-02-2015-0067 ↗
45. Lakhiwal, A., and Kar, A.K. (2016, January 13–15). Insights from twitter analytics: Modeling social media personality dimensions and impact of breakthrough events. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (I3E), Swansea, UK.10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_47 ↗
46. De Maio, C., Fenza, G., Loia, V., Parente, M., and Cuzzocrea, A. (2015, January 19–23). Towards OLAP Analysis of Multidimensional Tweet Streams. Proceedings of the DOLAP ’15: ACM Eighteenth International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, Melbourne, Australia.
47. Blachnik, M., and Kordos, M. (2020). Comparison of Instance Selection and Construction Methods with Various Classifiers. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113933 ↗
48. Kowsari, K., Meimandi, K.J., Heidarysafa, M., Mendu, S., Barnes, L., and Brown, D. (2019). Text Classification Algorithms: A Survey. Information, 10.10.3390/info10040150 ↗
49. Percepciones de los estudiantes sobre el uso de Facebook y Twitter en el contexto educativo por medio de la ciencia de datos y el aprendizaje automático
50. A Very Brief Introduction to Machine Learning with Applications to Communication Systems10.1109/TCCN.2018.2881442 ↗
51. TwiInsight: Discovering Topics and Sentiments from Social Media Datasets
52. Saura, J.R., Reyes-Menendez, A., and Alvarez-Alonso, C. (2018). Do online comments affect environmental management? Identifying factors related to environmental management and sustainability of hotels. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10093016 ↗
53. Redes sociales y bienestar psicológico del estudiante universitario
54. Las redes sociales como canal de comunicación de las marcas de moda españolas. El caso de Zara, Mango y el Corte Inglés
55. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests
56. Gujarati, D.N., and Porter, D.C. (2010). Essentials of Econometrics, McGraw-Hill. [4th ed.].
57. Gureeva, A.N. (2018). Social Networks as a Media Communication Resource for Managing the Image of a Russian Higher Education Institution. Mediascope, 2.
58. Impacto de twitter en la comunicación y promoción institucional de las universidades Impact of twitter on communication and institutional promotion of universities
59. Managing brands’ popularity on Facebook: Post time, content, and brand communication strategies10.22146/jieb.45755 ↗
60. Wang, Y., and Youn, H. (2019). Feature weighting based on inter-category and intra-category strength for Twitter sentiment analysis. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9010092 ↗
61. User-generated place brand equity on Twitter: The dynamics of brand associations in social media10.1057/pb.2014.8 ↗
62. Efficiency of human activity on information spreading on Twitter10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.007 ↗
63. Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.005 ↗
64. Modeling and OLAPing social media: The case of Twitter10.1007/s13278-015-0286-9 ↗
65. Kraiem, M.B., Feki, J., Khrouf, K., Ravat, F., and Teste, O. (2015, January 8–11). OLAP4Tweets: Multidimensional Modeling of tweets. Proceedings of the 19th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 2015), Poitiers, France.