journal article·2013-12

On the transition from diffusion-limited to kinetic-limited regimes of alloy solidification

S.L. Sobolev

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

An abrupt transition from diffusion-limited solidification to diffusionless, kinetic-limited solidification with complete solute trapping is explained as a critical phenomenon which arises due to local non-equilibrium diffusion effects in the bulk liquid. The transition occurs when the interface velocity V passes through the critical point V = VD, where V = VD is the bulk liquid diffusive velocity. Analytical expressions are developed for velocity–temperature and velocity–undercooling functions, using local non-equilibrium partition coefficient based on the Jackson et al. kinetic model and the local non-equilibrium diffusion model of Sobolev. The calculated functions demonstrate a sharp break in the velocity–undercooling and velocity–temperature relationships at the critical point V = VD. At this point the local non-equilibrium solidus and liquidus lines coincide with the T0 temperature. The relationship to pertinent experiments and the influence of the local non-equilibrium diffusion effects on grain refinement and disorder trapping phenomena are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2000 · 292 · 14210.1016/S0921-5093(00)01003-0 ↗
2. Asta · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 94110.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.020 ↗
3. Aziz · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 52710.1016/0956-7151(94)90507-X ↗
4. Eckler · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 501910.1103/PhysRevB.45.5019 ↗
5. Herlach · Mater Sci Eng A · 1994 · 179/180 · 14710.1016/0921-5093(94)90182-1 ↗
6. Willnecker · Appl Phys Lett · 1990 · 56 · 32410.1063/1.103289 ↗
7. Willnecker · Phys Rev Lett · 1989 · 62 · 270710.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2707 ↗
8. Walder · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 400710.1016/0956-7151(95)00092-A ↗
9. Walder · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 229 · 15610.1016/S0921-5093(96)10879-0 ↗
10. Sobolev · Phys Lett A · 1995 · 199 · 38310.1016/0375-9601(95)00084-G ↗
11. Sobolev · Phys Rev E · 1997 · 55 · 684510.1103/PhysRevE.55.6845 ↗
12. Sobolev · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 271110.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.036 ↗
13. Sobolev · Mat Lett · 2012 · 89 · 19110.1016/j.matlet.2012.08.065 ↗
14. Yu · J Cryst Growth · 1995 · 149 · 4510.1016/0022-0248(94)00974-0 ↗
15. Yang · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 025505-4
16. Humadi · Phys Rev E · 2013 · 87 · 02240410.1103/PhysRevE.87.022404 ↗
17. Biswas · Mat Sci Eng A · 2007 · 449–451 · 1210.1016/j.msea.2006.02.286 ↗
18. Biswas · Phil Mag · 2007 · 87 · 381710.1080/14786430701420549 ↗
19. Li · Scr Mater · 2010 · 62 · 71610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.041 ↗
20. Wang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 49710.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.042 ↗
21. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 259210.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.025 ↗
22. Liu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 601310.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.023 ↗
23. Li · J Cryst Growth · 2010 · 312 · 98210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.12.070 ↗
24. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 540210.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.016 ↗
25. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 585910.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.062 ↗
26. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 478710.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.021 ↗
27. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 144410.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.038 ↗
28. Sobolev · Phys Lett A · 2012 · 376 · 356310.1016/j.physleta.2012.10.031 ↗
29. Backer · 1970
30. Beatty · Cryst Growth · 2004 · 271 · 49510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.07.074 ↗
31. Boettinger · 1986
32. Assadi · J Cryst Growth · 1997 · 172 · 24910.1016/S0022-0248(96)00754-3 ↗
33. Ahmad · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 47 · 241110.1007/s10853-011-6062-y ↗