Center of Pressure Feedback Modulates the Entrainment of Voluntary Sway to the Motion of a Visual Target
Source abstract
Abstract
Visually guided weight shifting is widely employed in balance rehabilitation, but the underlying visuo-motor integration process leading to balance improvement is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the role of center of pressure (CoP) feedback on the entrainment of active voluntary sway to a moving visual target and on sway’s dynamic stability as a function of target predictability. Fifteen young and healthy adult volunteers (height 175 ± 7 cm, body mass 69 ± 12 kg, age 32 ± 5 years) tracked a vertically moving visual target by shifting their body weight antero-posteriorly under two target motion and feedback conditions, namely, predictable and less predictable target motion, with or without visual CoP feedback. Results revealed lower coherence, less gain, and longer phase lag when tracking the less predictable compared to the predictable target motion. Feedback did not affect CoP-target coherence, but feedback removal resulted in greater target overshooting and a shorter phase lag when tracking the less predictable target. These adaptations did not affect the dynamic stability of voluntary sway. It was concluded that CoP feedback improves spatial perception at the cost of time delays, particularly when tracking a less predictable moving target.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Vestibular and auditory disorders · Motor Control and Adaptation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Motor Behavior and Adapted Physical Activity, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54024 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Berlin School of Movement Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Department of Physical Education and Sports Science at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54024 Thessaloniki, Greece
Funding
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Visual feedback induces opposite effects on elementary centre of gravity and centre of pressure minus centre of gravity motions in undisturbed upright stance10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00003-2 ↗
2. Can explicit visual feedback of postural sway efface the effects of sensory manipulations on mediolateral balance performance?10.1152/jn.00103.2014 ↗
3. Augmented feedback of COM and COP modulates the regulation of quiet human standing relative to the stability boundary10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.03.021 ↗
4. Real-time visual feedback about postural activity increases postural instability and visually induced motion sickness10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.005 ↗
5. Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance10.1007/s00221-002-1154-1 ↗
6. Human postural control10.3389/fnins.2018.00171 ↗
7. Effects of visual center of pressure feedback on postural control in young and elderly healthy adults and in stroke patients10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00034-4 ↗
8. Exploring coordination dynamics of the postural system with real-time visual feedback10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.043 ↗
9. Relative efficacy of various strategies for visual feedback in standing balance activities10.1007/s00221-013-3634-x ↗
10. Error augmentation feedback for lateral weight shifting10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.003 ↗
11. Sensorimotor adaptation of whole-body postural control10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.029 ↗
12. Neuroscience Letters Posture and gaze tracking of a vertically moving target reveals age-related constraints in visuo-motor coupling10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.024 ↗
13. The general problem of motion stability10.1080/00207179208934253 ↗
14. Fractional stability of trunk acceleration dynamics of daily-life walking: Toward a unified concept of gait stability10.3389/fphys.2017.00516 ↗
15. Does visual augmented feedback reduce local dynamic stability while walking?10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.007 ↗
16. Hatzitaki, V., Stergiou, N., Sofianidis, G., and Kyvelidou, A. (2015). Postural Sway and Gaze Can Track the Complex Motion of a Visual Target. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0119828 ↗
17. Aging affects postural tracking of complex visual motion cues10.1007/s00221-016-4657-x ↗
18. Intermittent control with ankle, hip, and mixed strategies during quiet standing: A theoretical proposal based on a double inverted pendulum model10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.06.019 ↗
19. Frequency domain mediolateral balance assessment using a center of pressure tracking task10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.018 ↗
20. A framework for the analysis of mixed time series/point process data—Theory and application to the study of physiological tremor, single motor unit discharges and electromyograms10.1016/S0079-6107(96)00009-0 ↗
21. Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking10.1115/1.1336798 ↗
22. The influence of gait speed on local dynamic stability of walking10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.003 ↗
23. Transition from shod to barefoot alters dynamic stability during running10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.035 ↗
24. Geometry from a time series10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.712 ↗
25. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1134 ↗
26. The Maximum Lyapunov Exponent during Walking and Running: Reliability Assessment of Different Marker-Sets10.3389/fphys.2018.01101 ↗
27. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P ↗
28. Influence of stimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination10.1037/a0037417 ↗
29. Influence of stimulus velocity profile on unintentional visuomotor entrainment depends on eye movements10.1007/s00221-017-5055-8 ↗
30. Seeing what you want to see: Priors for one’s own actions represent exaggerated expectations of success10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00232 ↗
31. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120121 ↗
32. Computational Mechanisms of Sensorimotor Control10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006 ↗
33. Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability10.1038/nn.3616 ↗
34. Motor variability is not noise, but grist for the learning mill10.1038/nn.3633 ↗
35. Kennedy, M.W., Crowell, C.R., Villano, M., and Schmiedeler, J.P. (2016). Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0151393 ↗
36. Error Correction, Sensory Prediction, and Adaptation in Motor Control10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135 ↗
37. Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.157 ↗
38. Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy10.1037/h0023232 ↗
39. Influence of heading perception in the control of posture10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.02.001 ↗
40. Effects of visual motion consistent or inconsistent with gravity on postural sway10.1007/s00221-017-4942-3 ↗
41. Anticipation in feedback-delayed manual tracking of a chaotic oscillator10.1007/s00221-009-1940-0 ↗
42. Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-range correlations in synchronization behavior10.1016/j.physa.2008.05.015 ↗
43. Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuo-motor coordination10.1007/s00221-009-1958-3 ↗
44. Fitts’ law in human standing: The effect of scaling10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00842-3 ↗
45. Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097 ↗
46. Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing?10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1622 ↗