A comprehensive experimental study on bi-adhesive single lap joints using DIC technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Stress concentrations at the overlap ends are one of the main reasons for strength reduction in adhesive joints. The bi-adhesive technique was introduced as an efficient solution to reduce the stress concentrations at the overlap ends. Although several works have dealt with the numerical analysis of edge effects in bi-adhesive joints, none of them have experimentally analyzed the strain distribution along the bi-adhesive bondline. Moreover, the interaction of some geometrical parameters on the performance of bi-adhesive joints has not been studied yet. The aim of the current research is to present a comprehensive experimental analysis of bi-adhesive single lap joints using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique. Therefore, two different adhesives (one stiff and one flexible) were selected. Different parameters such as adhesive thickness, substrate thickness and length ratio (length of flexible adhesive at one overlap end to the total overlap length) were considered. Furthermore, the interaction of these parameters were experimentally analyzed using the DIC method. A numerical analysis was also conducted to analyze the effect of length ratio on the strain distribution along the bondline. Based on the results, the failure initiates at the interface between the stiff and flexible adhesives and kinks through the brittle adhesive. DIC results illustrate that the effect of length ratio on the adhesive peel strain increases by increasing the adhesive thickness and decreases by increasing the adherend stiffness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A study on 3-D stress distributions in the bi-adhesively bonded T-joints10.1016/j.apm.2013.06.008 ↗
2. Geometrical optimization of the overlap in mixed adhesive lap joints10.1080/00218464.2013.782813 ↗
3. Analytical solutions for adhesively bonded composite single-lap joints under mechanical loadings using full layerwise theory10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.012 ↗
4. Application of bi-adhesive in double-strap joints subjected to bending moment10.1163/156856106778884262 ↗
5. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 ↗
6. Increasing strength of single lap joints of metal adherends by taper minimization10.1163/156856103321340796 ↗
7. Three dimensional finite element analysis of bi-adhesively bonded double lap joint10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.016 ↗
8. Behaviour of bi-adhesive joints10.1163/016942409X12561252291982 ↗
9. Performance of bi-adhesive bonded aluminium lap joints10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00024-1 ↗
10. Rivet strength distribution in tensile-stressed rivet joints with constant cross-section
11. A comparative evaluation of numerical and analytical solutions to the biadhesive single-lap joint10.1155/2014/852872 ↗
12. An overview of manufacturing functionally graded adhesives–Challenges and prospects
13. Development of application method for fabricating functionally graded adhesive joints by two-component acrylic adhesives with different elastic moduli10.1080/00218464.2019.1583562 ↗
14. Variable-adhesive bonded joints(Stresses in ordinary lap joint compared to variable adhesive joint)
15. Study of the singular term in mixed adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.002 ↗
16. Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 ↗
17. Testing and simulation of mixed adhesive joints for aerospace applications10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.005 ↗
18. Numerical simulation of mono-and bi-adhesive aluminium lap joints10.1163/156856106775212387 ↗
19. Relief of edge effects in bi-adhesive composite joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.099 ↗
20. Saint-Venant's principle10.1007/BF00282253 ↗
21. An experimental investigation on the failure loads of the mono and bi-adhesive joints10.1080/01694243.2016.1264661 ↗
22. Adhesively bonded functionally graded joints by induction heating10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.045 ↗
23. Strength prediction of adhesively bonded single lap joints with different bondline thicknesses: a critical longitudinal strain approach10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.01.022 ↗
24. Predicting static strength in adhesively bonded single lap joints using a critical distance based method: substrate thickness and overlap length effects
25. The effect of adherend thickness on the failure of adhesively-bonded single-lap joints10.1163/1568561054890499 ↗
26. Behaviour under impact of mixed adhesive joints for the automotive industry10.1590/1679-78252762 ↗
27. Science of mixed-adhesive joints
28. Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
29. The use of the exponential Drucker-Prager material model for defining the failure loads of the mono and bi-adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.005 ↗
30. Variable modulus adhesives: an approach to optimised joint performance10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.08.002 ↗
31. Zwilsky · 2001
32. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
33. Impact of geometry on the critical values of the stress intensity factor of adhesively bonded joints10.1080/01694243.2017.1297064 ↗