journal article·2021-06-15Open access

MRI and CT Fusion in Stereotactic Electroencephalography: A Literature Review

Jaime Perez, Claudia Mazo, Maria Trujillo, Alejandro Herrera

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common neurological disease characterized by spontaneous recurrent seizures. Resection of the epileptogenic tissue may be needed in approximately 25% of all cases due to ineffective treatment with anti-epileptic drugs. The surgical intervention depends on the correct detection of epileptogenic zones. The detection relies on invasive diagnostic techniques such as Stereotactic Electroencephalography (SEEG), which uses multi-modal fusion to aid localizing electrodes, using pre-surgical magnetic resonance and intra-surgical computer tomography as the input images. Moreover, it is essential to know how to measure the performance of fusion methods in the presence of external objects, such as electrodes. In this paper, a literature review is presented, applying the methodology proposed by Kitchenham to determine the main techniques of multi-modal brain image fusion, the most relevant performance metrics, and the main fusion tools. The search was conducted using the databases and search engines of Scopus, IEEE, PubMed, Springer, and Google Scholar, resulting in 15 primary source articles. The literature review found that rigid registration was the most used technique when electrode localization in SEEG is required, which was the proposed method in nine of the found articles. However, there is a lack of standard validation metrics, which makes the performance measurement difficult when external objects are presented, caused primarily by the absence of a gold-standard dataset for comparison.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Epilepsy research and treatment · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Multimedia and Computer Vision Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760001, Colombia

UCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

CeADAR Ireland’s Centre for Applied AI, Dublin 4, Ireland

Clinica Imbanaco Grupo Quironsalud, Cali 760001, Colombia

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies10.1212/WNL.0000000000003509 ↗
2. Brodie, M., Barry, S., Bamagous, G., Norrie, J., and Kwan, P. (2012). Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology, 78.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563b19 ↗
3. World Health Organization (2019). Epilepsy: A Public Health Imperative, World Health Organization.
4. Baumgartner, C., Koren, J.P., Britto-Arias, M., Zoche, L., and Pirker, S. (2019). Presurgical epilepsy evaluation and epilepsy surgery. F1000Research, 8.10.12688/f1000research.17714.1 ↗
5. Minotti, L., Montavont, A., Scholly, J., Tyvaert, L., and Taussig, D. (2018). Indications and limits of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Neurophysiol. Clin., 48.10.1016/j.neucli.2017.11.006 ↗
6. Jayakar, P., Gotman, J., Harvey, A.S., Palmini, A., Tassi, L., Schomer, D., Dubeau, F., Bartolomei, F., Yu, A., and Kršek, P. (2016). Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques. Epilepsia, 57.10.1111/epi.13515 ↗
7. Stereoelectroencephalography: Indication and Efficacy10.2176/nmc.ra.2017-0008 ↗
8. Gross, R.E., and Boulis, N.M. (2018). Neurosurgical Operative Atlas: Functional Neurosurgery, Thieme/AANS. [3rd ed.].10.1055/b-0038-161979 ↗
9. Coregistration of multimodal imaging is associated with favourable two-year seizure outcome after paediatric epilepsy surgery10.1684/epd.2017.0902 ↗
10. Xu, R., Chen, Y.W., Tang, S., Morikawa, S., and Kurumi, Y. (2008). Parzen-Window Based Normalized Mutual Information for Medical Image Registration. IEICE Trans., 91-D.10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.1.132 ↗
11. Oliveira, F.P.M., and Tavares, J.M.R.S. (2014). Medical image registration: A review. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 17.10.1080/10255842.2012.670855 ↗
12. Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Brain Image Registration Techniques10.1097/00004728-199707000-00007 ↗
13. Kitchenham, B., and Charters, S. (2021, June 01). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Available online: https://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~laemmel/esecourse/slides/slr.pdf.
14. Page, M.J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., and Brennan, S.E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.10.31222/osf.io/gwdhk ↗
15. A curvelet-based patient-specific prior for accurate multi-modal brain image rigid registration10.1016/j.media.2010.08.004 ↗
16. Panda, R., Agrawal, S., Sahoo, M., and Nayak, R. (2017). A novel evolutionary rigid body docking algorithm for medical image registration. Swarm Evol. Comput., 33.10.1016/j.swevo.2016.11.002 ↗
17. Electrode localization for planning surgical resection of the epileptogenic zone in pediatric epilepsy10.1007/s11548-013-0915-6 ↗
18. Improved Localization of Implanted Subdural Electrode Contacts on Magnetic Resonance Imaging With an Elastic Image Fusion Algorithm in an Invasive Electroencephalography Recording10.1227/NEU.0000000000000473 ↗
19. Rühaak, J., Derksen, A., Heldmann, S., Hallmann, M., and Meine, H. (2015, January 20). Accurate CT-MR image registration for deep brain stimulation: A multi-observer evaluation study. Proceedings of the International Society for Optics and Photonics, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.2081392 ↗
20. Automated electrocorticographic electrode localization on individually rendered brain surfaces10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.005 ↗
21. Individualized localization and cortical surface-based registration of intracranial electrodes10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.046 ↗
22. Automatic quantification of multi-modal rigid registration accuracy using feature detectors10.1088/0031-9155/61/14/5198 ↗
23. van Rooijen, B.D., Backes, W.H., Schijns, O.E., Colon, A., and Hofman, P.A. (2013). Brain Imaging in Chronic Epilepsy Patients After Depth Electrode (Stereoelectroencephalography) Implantation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Computed Tomography?. Neurosurgery, 73.10.1227/01.neu.0000431478.79536.68 ↗
24. Patel, J.M., and Parikh, M.C. (2016, January 6–8). Medical image fusion based on Multi-Scaling (DRT) and Multi-Resolution (DWT) technique. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur, Tamilnadu, India.10.1109/ICCSP.2016.7754223 ↗
25. Ganasala, P., and Kumar, V. (2014). Multimodality medical image fusion based on new features in NSST domain. Biomed. Eng. Lett., 4.10.1007/s13534-014-0161-z ↗
26. Xu, X., Shan, D., Wang, G., and Jiang, X. (2016). Multimodal medical image fusion using PCNN optimized by the QPSO algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput., 46.10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.028 ↗
27. Kavitha, C.T., and Chellamuthu, C. (2010, January 15–17). Multimodal medical image fusion based on Integer Wavelet Transform and Neuro-Fuzzy. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, Chennai, India.10.1109/ICSIP.2010.5697486 ↗
28. Guided filter-based images fusion algorithm for CT and MRI medical images10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0920 ↗
29. Nair, R.R., and Singh, T. (2021). MAMIF: Multimodal adaptive medical image fusion based on B-spline registration and non-subsampled shearlet transform. Multimed. Tools Appl., 80.10.1007/s11042-020-10439-x ↗
30. Mitchell, H.B. (2010). Image Fusion: Theories, Techniques and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-11216-4 ↗
31. Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M.A., and Pluim, J.P.W. (2010). elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 29.10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616 ↗
32. Current trends in medical image registration and fusion10.1016/j.eij.2015.09.002 ↗
33. Deformable medical image registration: A survey10.1109/TMI.2013.2265603 ↗
34. Andrade, N., Faria, F.A., and Cappabianco, F.A.M. (November, January 29). A Practical Review on Medical Image Registration: From Rigid to Deep Learning Based Approaches. Proceedings of the 2018 31st SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI), Parana, Brazil.10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2018.00066 ↗
35. Keszei, A.P., Berkels, B., and Deserno, T.M. (2017). Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine. J. Digit. Imaging, 30.10.1007/s10278-016-9915-8 ↗
36. Yoo, T., Ackerman, M., Lorensen, W., Schroeder, W., Chalana, V., Aylward, S., Metaxas, D., and Whitaker, R. (2002). Engineering and Algorithm Design for an Image Processing API: A Technical Report on ITK—The Insight Toolkit. Stud. Health Technol. Inform., 85.
37. Rühaak, J., König, L., Hallmann, M., Papenberg, N., Heldmann, S., Schumacher, H., and Fischer, B. (2013, January 7–11). A fully parallel algorithm for multimodal image registration using normalized gradient fields. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556539 ↗
38. Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., and Sporring, J. (2006). Intensity Gradient Based Registration and Fusion of Multi-modal Images. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2006, Springer.
39. From Multi-Scale Decomposition to Non-Multi-Scale Decomposition Methods: A Comprehensive Survey of Image Fusion Techniques and Its Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2735865 ↗
40. Easley, G., Labate, D., and Lim, W.Q. (2008). Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 25.10.1016/j.acha.2007.09.003 ↗
41. Neural mechanisms of scene segmentation: Recordings from the visual cortex suggest basic circuits for linking field models10.1109/72.761705 ↗
42. Wang, Z., Wang, S., Zhu, Y., and Ma, Y. (2016). Review of Image Fusion Based on Pulse-Coupled Neural Network. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 23.10.1007/s11831-015-9154-z ↗
43. Kong, W., and Liu, J. (2013). Technique for image fusion based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform and improved pulse-coupled neural network. Opt. Eng., 52.10.1117/1.OE.52.1.017001 ↗
44. An overview of multi-modal medical image fusion10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.160 ↗
45. Wang, Z., and Bovik, A.C. (2002). A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 9.10.1109/97.995823 ↗
46. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
47. Loew, M.H. (1993). Estimation of accuracy in localizing externally attached markers in multimodal volume head images. Medical Imaging 1993: Image Processing, SPIE.
48. Pluim, J.P.W., Likar, B., and Gerritsen, F.A. (2006). Introduction to the Non-rigid Image Registration Evaluation Project (NIREP). Biomedical Image Registration, Springer.10.1007/11784012 ↗