journal article·2018-08

Effect of silane-containing universal adhesive on push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to composite resin and to resin cement/intraradicular dentin

Enaldo Marques França e Silva, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Cecilia Pedroso Turssi, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França, Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This in vitro study aimed at evaluating the effect of glass-fiber post (GFP) surface treatment with a silane-containing universal adhesive and/or a silane coupling agent on push-out bond strength to dual cure resin cement/dentin (Experiment 1) and to resin composite (Experiment 2). Methods: For Experiment 1, sixty human premolar root canals were prepared to receive GFP cementation. Then an adhesive system was applied, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The GFPs (Reforpost no. 2, Angelus) were randomly divided into 2 groups, according to application or non-application of a silane coupling agent for 60 seconds (Prosil, FGM). Each group was further divided into 3 groups, according to the adhesive system to be applied to the GFP surface (n = 10): 1. SBU - silane-containing universal adhesive (Adper Single Bond Universal Adhesive, 3M ESPE); 2. ASB2 – etch-and-rinse adhesive system not containing silane in its composition (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE); 3. CG (control group) – no treatment. Cementation of GFPs to intraradicular dentin was performed with dual-cure conventional resin cement (Rely X ARC/ 3M ESPE). After 48 h, the roots were cross-sectioned at three different depths, resulting in serial slices corresponding to the cervical, middle and apical root thirds. For Experiment 2, surface-treated GFPs (n=10) were centered in a plastic matrix in which the resin composite (Filtek Z250 XT, 3M ESPE) was incrementally inserted and light-cured. Slices were obtained, as in Experiment 1. Push-out bond strength testing was performed on a universal machine (0.5 mm/min crosshead speed). Results: In Experiment 1, three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) indicated that the bond strength of GFP to resin cement/intraradicular dentin was not affected by use or nonuse of a silane coupling agent, by application or non-application of an adhesive layer or by the root canal depth (p > 0.05). For Experiment 2, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test showed that when the GFP received silane pretreatment, bond strength to resin composite was not affected by the application of an adhesive layer to the post. However, when the post was not pretreated with silane, the bond strength was higher for the universal adhesive (p = 0.021). The bond strength to post/resin cement/dentin was unaffected by post silanization or by the application of an adhesive system layer on the post. Bond strength of the post to resin composite was unaffected by adhesive system application, if the post was previously treated with a silane agent. In the absent of post silanization, a universal adhesive containing silane achieved higher bond strength of the post to resin composite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9 ↗
2. Stiffness elastic limit and strength of newer types of endodontic posts10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00066-9 ↗
3. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores
4. Effect of cement type relining procedure and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.014 ↗
5. Bond strength of fibre glass and carbon fibre posts to the root canal walls using different resin cements10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00253.x ↗
6. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature review10.1590/S0103-64402012000200008 ↗
7. Comparison of micro push-out bond strengths of two fiber posts luted using simplified adhesive approaches10.4012/dmj.2009-089 ↗
8. Push-out strength of fiber posts depending on the type of root canal filling and resin cement10.1007/s00784-009-0376-z ↗
9. Failure of fiber posts after cementation with different adhesives with or without silanization investigated by pullout tests and scanning electron microscopy10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.022 ↗
10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with intra-radicular post: the effects of post system and dentine thickness10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.016 ↗
11. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.2341/13-070-LIT ↗
12. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.2341/14-330-O ↗
13. Fractographical analysis and biomechanical considerations of a tooth restored with intracanal fiber post: report of the fracture and importance of the fiber arrangements10.2341/15-262-S ↗
14. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts
15. The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post10.1038/ijos.2013.83 ↗
16. A comparative evaluation of effect of different chemical solvents on the shear bond strength of glass fiber reinforced post to core material10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1263 ↗
17. Effect of silane type and air-drying temperature on bonding fiber post to composite core and resin cement10.1590/0103-6440201300005 ↗
18. Comparative research for micro-push-out bond strengths of glass fiber posts treated by poly dopamine or silane coupling agent
19. Effect of different fiber post surface treatments on microtensile bond strength to composite resin10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.029 ↗
20. Comparison of the effect of shear bond strength with silane and other three chemical presurface treatments of a glass fiber-reinforced post on adhesion with a resin-based luting agent: an in vitro study10.4103/0976-237X.183056 ↗
21. Application of resin adhesive on the surface of a silanized glass fiber-reinforced post and its effect on the retention to root dentin10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.014 ↗
22. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003 ↗
23. In vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength between fiber posts and methacrylate or silorane based composite resins10.1186/s40563-016-0071-7 ↗
24. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.012 ↗
25. Effectiveness of bonding fiber posts to root canals and composite core build-ups10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00668.x ↗
26. Tensile strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments10.1590/0103-6440201302365 ↗
27. Removal resistance of glass fiber and metallic cast post with different lengths10.2334/josnusd.48.15 ↗
28. Effect of type of luting agent on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts10.1016/j.jdent.2013.01.011 ↗
29. Four-year follow-up of a direct anatomical fiber post and esthetic procedures: a case report10.2341/15-211-T ↗