journal article·2018-08Open access

The Flexible Initiation Test (FIT): A new experimental test to characterize fracture initiation in mode I at the free edge of bonded assemblies

Q. Bui, A. Maurel-Pantel, F. Mazerolle, C. Hochard

Abstract

Abstract Direct bonding is based on molecular adhesion. This bonding technique consists to join two surfaces into direct contact without the use of any adhesives or additional material. This process requires clean surfaces with a nanometric roughness, sufficiently close together to initiate bonding. Mechanical characterization of this type of assembly with classical mechanical test as for instance wedge test, cleavage test or double shear test present a highly scattering on mechanical results. This paper presents the Flexible Initiation Test (FIT test), an original test designed to characterize fracture initiation in mode I, and to decrease scattering in fracture initiation load measurements, in particular for adhesive with brittle behavior. This new test has to take into account the industrial framework: to be easy to manufacture, easy to execute repeatedly and efficient to provide experimental data for numerical models (stress criteria applications for instance). The paper proceeds first with an explanation of the main initial ideas to introduce the concept of this new test. Next, a numerical analysis is proposed to validate the concept and to determine the optimal geometry of the tests. Then the experimental device is set up and the concept is validated on three different adhesives with the same substrate (a brittle cyanoacrylate adhesive, a ductile and a brittle epoxy adhesives). To conclude, the FIT test is applied on direct bonded samples (an extreme case nanometric interface and very brittle behavior) to determine the fracture initiation load and to compare scattering of measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams · 1997
2. Tong · 1999
3. Adams · 2005
4. Measuring fracture toughness of adhesive joints
5. Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique10.1063/1.1729091 ↗
6. The three-point bend test for adhesive joints
7. Method to produce uniform plane-stress states with applications to fiber-reinforced materials10.1007/BF02324146 ↗
8. A study of the non-linear behaviour of adhesively-bonded composite assemblies10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.006 ↗
9. Analysis of the nonlinear behavior of adhesives in bonded assemblies-comparison of TAST and Arcan tests10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.006 ↗
10. Analysis of the non-linear behavior of an adhesive in bonded assemblies under shear loadings. Proposal of an improved TAST10.1163/156856109X432956 ↗
11. Influence of adhesive bond line thickness on joint strength10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.03.002 ↗
12. Epoxy resin Araldite® 420 Huntsman technical files. 〈http://www.huntsman.com/advanced_materials/Media%20Library/global/files/EUR_Adhesives%20Core%20Range%20-%20Adhesives_Epoxy_Araldite_Bonding_Resin.pdf〉; 2017 [Accessed 20 April 2017].
13. Development of an improved adhesive test method for composite assembly design10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.008 ↗
14. Kendall · 2001
15. Hydrophilic low-temperature direct wafer bonding10.1063/1.3040701 ↗
16. Mechanical characterization of direct bonded silica surfaces10.1080/01694243.2013.876138 ↗
17. Influence of roughness on mechanical strength of direct bonded silica and Zerodur® glasses10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.02.006 ↗
18. Effect of surface characteristic on room-temperature silicon direct bonding10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.025 ↗
19. Void-free silicon-wafer-bond strength 200-400 °C range10.1016/0924-4247(93)85009-5 ↗
20. Cyanoacrylate adhesive Permabond 910 technical files. 〈http://www.permabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/910_TDS.pdf〉; 2017 [Accessed 20 April 2017].
21. Scotch-Weld™ 3M 2216 B/A technical files. 〈http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/319184O/2216-ba-fiche-technique-colle-3mtm-scotch-weld.pdf?&2l8TyEVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666--〉; 2017 [Accessed 20 April 2017].
22. Araldite® AV 138M-1 / Hardener HV 998 technical files. 〈http://commerce.sage.com/bag/upload//site/default/FT/Fran%C3%A7ais/Araldite/Araldite%20AV%20138M-1%20+%20Hardener%20HV998.pdf〉; 2017 [Accessed 20 April 2017].
23. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
24. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
25. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
26. On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004 ↗
27. Symmetrical linear displacement system technical files. 〈https://www.rk-rose-krieger.com/fileadmin/catalogue/lineartechnik/fr/lt_copas_fr.pdf〉; 2017 [Accessed 20 April 2017].
28. Strength or toughness? A criterion for crack onset at a notch10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗