Three‐dimensional inverse analyses of a deep excavation in Chicago clays
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Numerical models are commonly used to estimate excavation‐induced ground movements. Two‐dimensional (2D) plain strain assumption is typically used for the simulation of deep excavations which might not be suitable for excavations where three‐dimensional (3D) effects dominate the ground response. This paper adapts an inverse analysis algorithm to learn soil behavior from field measurements using a 3D model representation of an excavation. The paper describes numerical issues related to this development including the generation of the 3D model mesh from laser scan images of the excavation. The inverse analysis to extract the soil behavior in 3D is presented. The model captures the measured wall deflections. Although settlements were not sufficiently measured, the predicted settlements around the excavation site reflected strong 3D effects and were consistent with empirical correlations. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. A simplified model for wall deflection and ground surface settlement caused by braced excavation in clays
2. Clough GW · 1990 · 439
3. PeckRB.Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. Seventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Mexico City 1969;225–290.
4. Wong IH · 1970
5. Performance of tied‐back walls in clay10.1061/AJGEB6.0000128 ↗
6. Prediction of movements for braced cuts in clay10.1061/AJGEB6.0001150 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:1(69)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:1(69) ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:3(187)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:3(187) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:10(1590)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:10(1590) ↗
10. Application of a fully coupled method to the analysis of an excavation10.3208/sandf1972.33.4_36 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(826)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(826) ↗
12. 10.1002/nag.161015120210.1002/nag.1610151202 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00020-310.1016/S0266-352X(00)00020-3 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(206)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(206) ↗
15. 10.1080/02533839.1994.967763410.1080/02533839.1994.9677634 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:6(474)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:6(474) ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.03.00410.1016/j.compgeo.2004.03.004 ↗
18. SakuraiA TakahashiT.Dynamic stresses of underground pipeline during earthquakes. Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Santiago de Chile 1969.
19. 10.1016/0266-352X(95)00022-310.1016/0266-352X(95)00022-3 ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1407::AID-NAG934>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1407::AID-NAG934>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
21. Application of back analysis to several test embankments on soft clay deposits10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_60 ↗
22. 10.1002/nag.161018100410.1002/nag.1610181004 ↗
23. 10.1002/nag.161011060410.1002/nag.1610110604 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00020-310.1016/S0266-352X(00)00020-3 ↗
25. 10.1002/nag.61410.1002/nag.614 ↗
26. 10.1016/0266-352X(95)00021-210.1016/0266-352X(95)00021-2 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(206)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:3(206) ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-352X(96)00006-710.1016/S0266-352X(96)00006-7 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1019)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1019) ↗
30. 10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00056-910.1016/S0266-352X(03)00056-9 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(337)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(337) ↗
32. 10.1139/t98-01310.1139/t98-013 ↗
33. St‐JohnHD.Field and theoretical studies of the behaviour of ground around deep excavations in London clay. Ph.D. Thesis Cambridge University 1975.
34. MoormannC KatzenbachR.Three‐dimensional effects of deep excavations with rectangular shape. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Soil‐Structure Interaction Zurich 2002;135–142.
35. 10.1680/geot.2005.55.7.49710.1680/geot.2005.55.7.497 ↗
36. Three‐dimensional responses of a tiedback excavation through clay10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(273) ↗
37. 10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00025-710.1016/S0266-352X(99)00025-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.00510.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.005 ↗
39. Three‐dimensional deformation behavior of the Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) excavation case history10.1139/t00-018 ↗
40. BlackburnJT.Automated sensing and three‐dimensional analysis of internally braced excavations. Ph.D. Thesis Northwestern University 2005;369.
41. Integration of construction as‐built data via laser scanning with geotechnical monitoring of urban excavation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:12(1234) ↗
42. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<105::AID-NME356>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<105::AID-NME356>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
43. MarulandaC HashashYMA.Relationship of inferred soil behavior to excavation instrumentation. XIII Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanic and Foundation Engineering Isla de Margarita Venezuela 2007;064–970.
44. OsouliA HashashYMA.Learning of soil behavior from measured response of a full scale test wall in sandy soil. 6th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering Arlington VA 2008;11–16.
45. SongH OsouliA HashashY.Soil behavior and excavation instrumentation layout. 7th International Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics FMGM 2007 Boston MA 2007.10.1061/40940(307)96 ↗
46. Osouli A · 2009