journal article·2025-07Open access

Multiscale and Multifield Investigation on Soil Leakage at the Diaphragm Wall Opening During Excavation

Yajing Liu, Chenglong Jiang, Lingling Zeng, Zhangbo Wan, Xuanyu Cheng

Abstract

ABSTRACT Opening in diaphragm wall is a primary cause of water and sand leakage in excavation, often leading to severe excavation accidents. This process involves complex interactions between fluid flow, granular soil around openings, and continuum materials, yet there is a lack of appropriate calculation methods to address it. This study develops a multiscale, multifield calculation framework integrating the discrete element method (DEM), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and finite difference method (FDM) to address the challenges of large deformation and fluid‐soil interaction caused by through‐wall leakage in excavation. A numerical model is developed based on a relevant case of retaining wall leakage, analyzing the effects of leakage depth, surcharge load, and water head. The study reveals that soil leakage at the diaphragm wall opening is driven by both geostress and fluid forces. As strain energy release from stress relief increases with leakage depth, it accelerates soil particle movement, resulting in greater soil loss at deeper levels. However, the soil arching effect at deeper levels limits the stress relief zone, reducing the influence area and mitigating the adverse effects of soil leakage. Additionally, while surcharge load behind the diaphragm wall has minimal impact on cumulative soil loss at the opening, it significantly increases ground settlement and wall deflection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou P. R. China

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture Zhejiang Sci‐Tech University Hangzhou P. R. China

Zhejiang Huadong Geotechnical Investigation & Design Institute Corporation Limited Hangzhou P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Statistical Analysis of the Accidents of Foundation Pit of the Urban Mass Rail Transit Station
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000085510.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000855 ↗
3. 10.1680/feng.2011.164.4.16510.1680/feng.2011.164.4.165 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tust.2023.10505610.1016/j.tust.2023.105056 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000105810.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001058 ↗
6. A. F.Van TolandM.Korff “Deep Excavations for Amsterdam Metro North‐South Line: An Update and Lessons Learned ” inGeotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground‐Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground(2012):37–45.
7. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10636610.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106366 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000085510.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000855 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12665-016-6141-010.1007/s12665-016-6141-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10834610.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108346 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.00710.1016/j.tust.2017.10.007 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10040-020-02142-w10.1007/s10040-020-02142-w ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.12458210.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124582 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.undsp.2018.03.00210.1016/j.undsp.2018.03.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.00810.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.008 ↗
16. 10.1080/19648189.2023.220645110.1080/19648189.2023.2206451 ↗
17. 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-1189110.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11891 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10509210.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105092 ↗
19. 10.3390/buildings1403072410.3390/buildings14030724 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.05.01210.1016/j.undsp.2023.05.012 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.01710.1016/j.tust.2018.09.017 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11069-016-2275-310.1007/s11069-016-2275-3 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11069-016-2275-310.1007/s11069-016-2275-3 ↗
24. Numerical Simulation of Ground Movement Induced by Leakage of Groundwater and Sand in Excavations Based on the DEM‐CFD Method
25. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10539510.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105395 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11517710.1016/j.cma.2022.115177 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.09.01310.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.09.013 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000130010.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001300 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.undsp.2018.09.00210.1016/j.undsp.2018.09.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/0301-9322(94)90011-610.1016/0301-9322(94)90011-6 ↗
31. 10.1017/S002211201000306X10.1017/S002211201000306X ↗
32. 10.2118/88819-PA10.2118/88819-PA ↗
33. T.ShanandY.Hong “Construction Plan for Foundation Pit Restoration of Shuichengqiao Station on Hangzhou Metro Line 4.” Internal Report (2016).
34. Research on the Lateral Displacement Control Measures of the Tunnels Adjacent to Foundation Pits in shanghai Soft Clay Area
35. 10.1002/nag.238710.1002/nag.2387 ↗
36. 10.1002/nag.315110.1002/nag.3151 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(57)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(57) ↗
38. 10.1007/s11440-022-01734-y10.1007/s11440-022-01734-y ↗
39. 10.1139/t99-11610.1139/t99-116 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10035-013-0467-z10.1007/s10035-013-0467-z ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000032410.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000324 ↗
42. 10.1680/geot.2010.60.6.44710.1680/geot.2010.60.6.447 ↗
43. 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.31710.1680/jgeot.16.P.317 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.02.00310.1016/j.powtec.2013.02.003 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00183-110.1016/S0378-4371(99)00183-1 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.03710.1016/j.ces.2003.09.037 ↗
47. 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.4710.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-3-319-29982-2_210.1007/978-3-319-29982-2_2 ↗
49. 10.1007/s11440-019-00789-810.1007/s11440-019-00789-8 ↗
50. 10.1017/S002211201000306X10.1017/S002211201000306X ↗