journal article·2006-11

A non-coaxial critical state soil model and its application to simple shear simulations

Yunming Yang, H.S. Yu

Publisher page

Abstract

The yield vertex non-coaxial theory is implemented into a critical state soil model, CASM (Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1998; 22:621–653) to investigate the non-coaxial influences on the stress–strain simulations of real soil behaviour in the presence of principal stress rotations. The CASM is a unified clay and sand model, developed based on the soil critical state concept and the state parameter concept. Without loss of simplicity, it is capable of simulating the behaviour of sands and clays within a wide range of densities. The non-coaxial CASM is employed to simulate the simple shear responses of Erksak sand and Weald clay under different densities and initial stress states. Dependence of the soil behaviour on the Lode angle and different plastic flow rules in the deviatoric plane are also considered in the study of non-coaxial influences. All the predictions indicate that the use of the non-coaxial model makes the orientations of the principal stress and the principal strain rate different during the early stage of shearing, and they approach the same ultimate values with an increase in loading. These ultimate orientations are dependent on the density of soils, and independent of their initial stress states. The use of the non-coaxial model also softens the shear stress evolutions, compared with the coaxial model. It is also found that the ultimate shear strengths by using the coaxial and non-coaxial models are dependent on the plastic flow rules in the deviatoric plane. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Mroz · Geotechnique · 1979 · 29 · 110.1680/geot.1979.29.1.1 ↗
2. Manzari · Geotechnique · 1997 · 47 · 25510.1680/geot.1997.47.2.255 ↗
3. Kolymbas · Archive Applied Mechanics · 1991 · 61 · 14310.1007/BF00788048 ↗
4. Park · Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 2000 · 129 · 83410.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:9(834) ↗
5. Yang · Geotechnique · 2003 · 53 · 42110.1680/geot.2003.53.4.421 ↗
6. , . Principal axes observed during simple shear of a sand. Proceedings of the Geotech. Conference, vol. 1, Oslo, 1967; 231–237.
7. Roscoe · Geotechnique · 1970 · 20 · 12910.1680/geot.1970.20.2.129 ↗
8. Oda · Soils and Foundations · 1974 · 14 · 2510.3208/sandf1972.14.4_25 ↗
9. Christofferson · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1981 · 48 · 33910.1115/1.3157619 ↗
10. Joer · Geotechnique · 1998 · 48 · 60510.1680/geot.1998.48.5.605 ↗
11. Spencer · Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids · 1964 · 12 · 33710.1016/0022-5096(64)90029-8 ↗
12. De Josselin De Jong · Geotechnique · 1971 · 21 · 15510.1680/geot.1971.21.2.155 ↗
13. Harris · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · 1993 · 41 · 151510.1016/0022-5096(93)90038-H ↗
14. Yu · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A · 2006 · 462 · 72510.1098/rspa.2005.1590 ↗
15. Rudnicki · Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids · 1975 · 23 · 37110.1016/0022-5096(75)90001-0 ↗
16. Yang · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 2006 · 30 · 110.1002/nag.468 ↗
17. Hashiguchi · International Journal of Plasticity · 2001 · 17 · 11710.1016/S0749-6419(00)00021-8 ↗
18. Bardet · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · 1991 · 117 · 146610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:7(1466) ↗
19. Papamichos · Geotechnique · 1995 · 45 · 64910.1680/geot.1995.45.4.649 ↗
20. Hashiguchi · International Journal of Plasticity · 2003 · 19 · 165110.1016/S0749-6419(02)00113-4 ↗
21. , . Application of non-coaxial plasticity models in geotechnical analysis. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 2, Osaka, Japan, 2005; 993–996.
22. . The importance of accounting for non-coaxial behavior in modeling soil–structure interaction. Proceedings of the 11th IACMAG, Invited Issue Paper, vol. 4, Torino, 2005; 709–718.
23. Sloan · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 1987 · 24 · 89310.1002/nme.1620240505 ↗
24. Finite element algorithms for elastoplasticity and consolidation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle, Australia, 1997.
25. Yu · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 1998 · 22 · 62110.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199808)22:8<621::AID-NAG937>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
26. Yu · Granular Matter · 2005 · 7 · 21310.1007/s10035-005-0209-y ↗
27. Been · Geotechnique · 1985 · 35 · 9910.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99 ↗
28. Been · Geotechnique · 1991 · 41 · 36510.1680/geot.1991.41.3.365 ↗
29. . Computational aspects of a unified critical state model for clay and sand. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, Rome, 2002; 271–277.
30. . Application of a unified plasticity model in finite element analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on 3D Finite Element for Pavement Analysis, Design and Research, Amsterdam, 2002; 253–267.
31. Potts · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 1984 · 8 · 25910.1002/nag.1610080305 ↗