journal article·2023-02

Bearing capacity factors of cone‐shaped footing in meshfree

Ty Phuor, Avshalom Ganz, Pavel A. Trapper

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Unlike the flat base foundations, the determination of the bearing resistance of the cone‐shaped footing in finite element analysis (FEA) might not be carried out without considering the interface model. In addition, the simulations of the FEA is hardly achieved with a large system due to the assembly technique. So, the alternative should be considered. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method for computing the , and factors of the bearing capacity of the rough and smooth cone‐shaped foundations by combining the skew boundary condition as the interface model incorporated with the viscoplastic strain method‐based meshfree obeying the yield equation of the Mohr‐Coulomb (MC). Thus, the factors can be determined exclusively and reported to reach a close agreement with the published data; nevertheless, the discrepancies are also provided. The plastic flow of the soil mechanics is discussed thoroughly. In addition, the effects of soil friction angle (ϕ) and cone‐shaped angle (β) on the factors are inspected systematically. Accordingly, the conservation of the Terzaghi's superposition assumption is confirmed, and the bearing capacity factor charts can be established for various combinations of 5o – 45o and 30o – 180o. Therefore, it may conclude that the results produced by these techniques and the techniques themselves may be applied confidently for solving geotechnical problems, especially for computing the bearing resistance of the soil.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering Ariel University Ariel Israel

Department of Structural Engineering Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev Beer‐Sheva Israel

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1680/geot.1982.32.3.19510.1680/geot.1982.32.3.195 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(468)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(468) ↗
3. 10.1139/t03-00910.1139/t03-009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.01210.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.012 ↗
5. 10.1186/s40064-016-3084-610.1186/s40064-016-3084-6 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000283510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002835 ↗
7. 10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/01201110.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012011 ↗
8. 10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/01201710.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012017 ↗
9. 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00381-C10.1016/0045-7949(94)00381-C ↗
10. 10.1139/t93-09910.1139/t93-099 ↗
11. MartinCM User Guide for ABC‐Analysis of Bearing Capacity;2004.
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(38)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(38) ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000134510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001345 ↗
14. 10.1139/t05-05110.1139/t05-051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.05.00510.1016/j.compgeo.2007.05.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.04.00410.1016/j.compgeo.2012.04.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.02110.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.021 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.04.00610.1016/j.compgeo.2017.04.006 ↗
19. 10.1139/cgj-2014-050710.1139/cgj-2014-0507 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000225610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002256 ↗
21. Object oriented system as applied to jack‐up analysis
22. PhuorT Development and application of three‐dimensional finite element interface model for soil‐jack‐up interaction during preloading [PhD Thesis]. Published online2020.
23. 10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.54110.1680/geot.1990.40.4.541 ↗
24. CassidyMJ HoulsbyGT On the modelling of foundations for jack‐up units on sand. In:InProceeding of the 31st Offshore Technology Conference;1999:1‐13.10.4043/10995-MS ↗
25. 10.1680/geot.2005.55.9.67910.1680/geot.2005.55.9.679 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000005410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000054 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.06.00210.1016/j.marstruc.2011.06.002 ↗
28. 10.1139/t2012-08510.1139/t2012-085 ↗
29. 10.1139/T07-10810.1139/T07-108 ↗
30. MeyerhofGG The ultimate bearing capacity of wedge‐shaped foundations. In:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering;1961:105‐109.
31. 10.1680/geot.1982.32.2.11110.1680/geot.1982.32.2.111 ↗
32. 10.1139/t88-01610.1139/t88-016 ↗
33. MartinCM Physical and numerical modelling of offshore foundations under combined loads [Ph.D Thesis]. Published online1994.
34. 10.1680/geot.2002.52.9.68710.1680/geot.2002.52.9.687 ↗
35. 10.1680/geot.2003.53.5.51310.1680/geot.2003.53.5.513 ↗
36. 10.1002/nag.90010.1002/nag.900 ↗
37. 10.12989/gae.2009.1.3.20510.12989/gae.2009.1.3.205 ↗
38. 10.1680/geot.2008.378110.1680/geot.2008.3781 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10426410.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104264 ↗
40. 10.1016/0045-7949(90)90207-I10.1016/0045-7949(90)90207-I ↗
41. 10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00240-410.1016/S0045-7949(96)00240-4 ↗
42. Bearing capacity of three‐dimensional jack‐up structure [Under review]
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:2(576)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:2(576) ↗
44. 10.1002/nag.161001030210.1002/nag.1610010302 ↗
45. Zienkiewicz OC · 2014
46. 10.1007/BFb001517910.1007/BFb0015179 ↗
47. Visco plastic algorithm for modelling tensile non‐linearity in rock and concrete structure
48. Model order reduction for Campbell diagram analysis of shaft‐disc‐blade system in 3D finite elements
49. PhuorT YoonGH.Eigensensitivity of damped system with distinct and repeated eigenvalues by chain rule [Under Review]. Engineering Structures.2022. Published online.10.1002/nme.7331 ↗
50. 10.1002/nme.162009011010.1002/nme.1620090110 ↗
51. Plaxis.Material models manual: essential for geotechnical professionals. Published online2016.
52. 10.1002/978047017276610.1002/9780470172766 ↗
53. 10.1080/17486025.2016.115372910.1080/17486025.2016.1153729 ↗