An Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Retroreflectivity Performance of In-Service Road Traffic Signs
Source abstract
Abstract
The road traffic signs in Sweden have no inventory system and it is unknown when a sign has reached the end of its service life and needs to be replaced. As a result, the road authorities do not have a systematic maintenance program for road traffic signs, and many signs which are not in compliance with the minimum retroreflectivity performance requirements are still found on the roads. Therefore, it is very important to find an inexpensive, safe, easy, and highly accurate method to judge the retroreflectivity performance of road signs. This will enable maintenance staff to determine the retroreflectivity of road signs without requiring measuring instruments for retroreflectivity or colors performance. As a first step toward the above goal, this paper aims to identify factors affecting the retroreflectivity of road signs. Two different datasets were used, namely, the VTI dataset from Sweden and NMF dataset from Denmark. After testing different models, two logarithmic regression models were found to be the best-fitting models, with R2 values of 0.50 and 0.95 for the VTI and NMF datasets, respectively. The first model identified the age, direction, GPS positions, color, and class of road signs as significant predictors, while the second model used age, color, and the class of road signs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Safety Warnings and Signage · Traffic and Road Safety · Noise Effects and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information and Engineering, Dalarna University, 781 70 Borlänge, Sweden
Swedish Transport Administration, Röda Vägen 1, 781 89 Borlänge, Sweden
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Model for Predicting Traffic Signs Functional Service Life—The Republic of Croatia Case Study10.7307/ptt.v29i3.2247 ↗
2. Looking behavior for vertical road signs10.1016/j.trf.2014.01.003 ↗
3. Berzinsh, J., Ozolinsh, M., Cikmacs, P., and Pesudovs, K. (2002). Recognition of Retroreflective Road Signs during Night Driving. Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health, and the Workplace, Shaker Publishing.
4. Retroreflective Material Specifications and On-Road Sign Performance10.3141/1801-08 ↗
5. Reductions in Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Caused by Frost and Dew10.3141/1844-10 ↗
6. Swargam, N. (2004). Development of a Neural Network Approach for the Assessment of the Performance of Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity. [Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University].
7. European Committee for Standardization (2007). Fixed, Vertical Road Traffic Signs—Part 1: Fixed SignEN 12899-1.
8. The Research for the Aging Performance of Reflective Sheeting by Artificial Accelerated Method10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.361-363.2326 ↗
9. Alkhulaifi, A., Jamal, A., and Ahmad, I. (2021). Predicting Traffic Sign Retro-Reflectivity Degradation Using Deep Neural Networks. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411595 ↗
10. Brimley, B.K., and Carlson, P. (2013, January 13–17). The Current State of Research on the Long-Term Deterioration of Traffic Signs. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting and Publication in the Transportation Research Record, Washington, DC, USA. Paper 13-0033.
11. Factors Affecting Night-Time Visibility of Retroreflective Road Traffic Signs: A Review
12. Analysis of In-Service Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity and Deterioration Rates in Texas10.3141/2258-11 ↗
13. Wolshon, B., Degeyter, R., and Swargam, J. (2002, January 2–4). Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Road Sign Retroreflectivity Performance. Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Symposium on Visibility and Simulation, Iowa City, IA, USA.
14. Synthesis of Sign Deterioration Rates Across the United States
15. Huynh, N., Mullen, R., Pulver, Z., and Shiri, S. (2018). Sign Life Expectancy, Transport Research International Documentation (TRID).
16. Synthesis of sign deterioration rates across the United States10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:3(94) ↗
17. Rasdorf, W.J., Hummer, J.E., Harris, E.A., Immaneni, V.P.K., and Yeom, C. (2006). Designing an Efficient Nighttime Sign Inspection Procedure to Ensure Motorist Safety, North Carolina Department of Transportation.
18. Venables, W.N., and Ripley, B.D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 ↗
19. Osborne, J.W., and Waters, E. (2002). Multiple Regression Assumptions. ERIC Digest, ERIC Publications. ED470205.
20. Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test
21. Pawitan, Y. (2001). All Likelihood: Statistical Modeling and Inference Using Likelihood, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198507659.001.0001 ↗
22. Shao, C. (2019). Backward Selection—A Way to Final Model, Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co., Ltd.. Paper PO-077.