Attainable Moment Set Optimization to Support Configuration Design: A Required Moment Set Based Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss an attainable moment set (AMS) optimization methodology considering a system’s required moment set (RMS). The AMS describes the achievable moments from a system, given its input limits. An RMS, like an AMS, is a convex set in the moment space, describing the required moments for a system to meet the designed mission profile and disturbance rejection requirements. Given the configuration of a system, its mission requirements, and the derived RMS, the proposed optimization maximizes coverage of the AMS onto the RMS, thus ensuring the system possesses the guaranteed controllability to fulfill its required missions from a design level. To achieve this goal, the variables to optimize are chosen as effector settings, such as the installation position and angle of propellers and control surfaces, which effectively change the AMS without a vast impact on major design parameters, such as mass and moment of inertia. Since the optimization includes massive geometry operations of rays intersecting polyhedron, an efficient intersection solver is proposed to speed up the optimization process. The described method is applied to an electric-vertical-take-of-landing vehicle (eVTOL) with eight hover propellers, which delivers a highly improved coverage of the RMS compared to its initial design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Flight System Dynamic, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Constrained control allocation10.2514/3.21072 ↗
2. Constrained control allocation—Three-moment problem10.2514/3.21201 ↗
3. Varriale, C., Voskuijl, M., and Veldhuis, L.L. (2020). Trim for Maximum Control Authority Using the Attainable Moment Set. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020/01/05, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2020-1265 ↗
4. Nguyen Van, E., Troillard, P., Jézégou, J., Alazard, D., Pastor, P., and Döll, C. (2018, January 23–25). Reduction of Vertical Tail Using Differential Thrust: Influence on Flight Control and Certification. Proceedings of the Advanced Aircraft Efficiency in a Global Air Transport System (AEGATS’18), Toulouse, France.
5. Co-design of aircraft vertical tail and control laws using distributed electric propulsion10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.295 ↗
6. Moore, K.R., and Ning, A. (2018). Distributed Electric Propulsion Effects on Existing Aircraft through Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2018-1652 ↗
7. Pei, J., Bassett, G., Grisham, J., Finch, P., Toniolo, M., Miller, L., and Bandu, P. (2018). Generic Control Allocation Toolbox for Preliminary Vehicle Design. 2018 Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Reston, Virginia, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/6.2018-3894 ↗
8. Söpper, M., Zhang, J., and Holzapfel, F. (2021). Required Moment Sets: Enhanced Controllability Analysis for Nonlinear Aircraft Models. Appl. Sci., submitted.10.3390/app11083456 ↗
9. Durham, W., Bordignon, K.A., and Beck, R. (2017). Aircraft Control Allocation, Wiley.10.1002/9781118827789 ↗
10. Bordignon, K.A. (1996). Constrained Control Allocation for Systems with Redundant Control Effectors, Virginia Tech.
11. The Mathworks, Inc. (2020). MATLAB Version: 9.8.0.1451342 (R2020a), The Mathworks, Inc.
12. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls10.1145/235815.235821 ↗
13. Control allocation—A Survey10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.035 ↗
14. Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Control Allocation10.2514/2.4937 ↗
15. Foley, J.D., Van, F.D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S.K., Hughes, J.F., Angel, E., and Hughes, J. (1996). Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, Addison-Wesley Professional.
16. Mebius, J.E. (2007). Derivation of the Euler-Rodrigues formula for three-dimensional rotations from the general formula for four-dimensional rotations. arXiv.
17. Multirotor Aerial Vehicles: Modeling, Estimation, and Control of Quadrotor10.1109/MRA.2012.2206474 ↗
18. Riether, F. (2016). Agile Quadrotor Maneuvering Using Tensor-Decomposition-Based Globally Optimal Control and Onboard Visual-Inertial Estimation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Härkegård, O. (2021, February 01). Quadratic Programming Control Allocation Toolbox for Matlab (Version 1.2.1). Available online: http://research.harkegard.se/qcat/.
20. The generalized simplex method for minimizing a linear form under linear inequality restraints10.2140/pjm.1955.5.183 ↗